{"id":9279,"date":"2009-05-19T18:55:19","date_gmt":"2009-05-19T16:55:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=9279"},"modified":"2009-05-19T18:55:19","modified_gmt":"2009-05-19T16:55:19","slug":"mahkeme-gul-yargilanmali-dedi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=9279","title":{"rendered":"Mahkeme 'G\u00fcl yarg\u0131lanmal\u0131' dedi"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"fft5_mf175491\"Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ‘kay\u0131p trilyon davas\u0131’nda Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00fcl i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. G\u00fcl ise tepkili: Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 yarg\u0131lanamaz.<\/strong><\/p>\n

ANKARA – Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, kay\u0131p trilyon davas\u0131yla ilgili olarak, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Abdullah G\u00fcl hakk\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda \u201c\u015e\u00fcphelinin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle milletvekili ve bakanlara tan\u0131nan dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin, hukuktan yoksun ve kanunlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r\u201d dedi. G\u00fcl ise karar\u0131n \u2018iyi niyetli\u2019 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, \u201cCumhurba\u015fkanlar\u0131 vatana ihanet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir su\u00e7la yarg\u0131lanamaz\u201d dedi.
\nAnayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131yla kapat\u0131lan Refah Partisi\u2019nin (RP) y\u00f6neticileri hakk\u0131nda, 1997\u2019de Hazine yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 devlete iade etmemek i\u00e7in yakla\u015f\u0131k 1 trilyon liray\u0131 (1 milyon TL) sahte faturalarla harcanm\u0131\u015f gibi g\u00f6sterdikleri gerek\u00e7esiyle dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. D\u00f6nemin RP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Necmettin Erbakan\u00a0 78 parti y\u00f6neticisinin \u2018\u00f6zel evrakta sahtecilik\u2019 su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada Erbakan, iki y\u0131l d\u00f6rt ay hapse mahk\u00fbm oldu.\u00a0 68 RP y\u00f6neticisi de bir y\u0131l iki aya kadar hapis ald\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 onaylad\u0131. Ancak eski RP Genel Ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakan\u0131 Abdullah G\u00fcl hakk\u0131nda, milletvekilli\u011fi nedeniyle devaml\u0131 dokunulmazl\u0131k alt\u0131nda olduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131.
\nG\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn milletvekilli\u011finin sona ermesi ve Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 se\u00e7ilmesinin ard\u0131ndan TBMM\u2019ye g\u00f6nderilen dosya gere\u011finin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131\u011fa iletildi. Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k da dosyay\u0131 Ankara Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ula\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u2019n\u0131 dokunulmazl\u0131k z\u0131rh\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu h\u00fckmederek \u2018yasal imk\u00e2ns\u0131zl\u0131k nedeniyle\u2019 soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi.
\nCahit Nalbanto\u011flu adl\u0131 vatanda\u015f karara itiraz etti. \u0130tiraz\u0131 inceleyen Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, 15 May\u0131s\u2019ta takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verdi. G\u00fcl\u2019den \u2018\u015f\u00fcpheli\u2019 diye s\u00f6z edilen kararda \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201cT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131 ve yasalar\u0131nda herkesin yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n kural oldu\u011fu, dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ise bir istisna olup, bu ki\u015filer yasalarda tek tek belirlenmi\u015f, bunlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hi\u00e7 kimseye yarg\u0131lanmama z\u0131rh\u0131 tan\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilirken, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yasalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnde dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan ve yasalarda yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131 istisna kabul edilen ki\u015filerle ile k\u0131yas yaparak, \u015f\u00fcphelinin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle milletvekili ve bakanlara tan\u0131nan dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yasa koyucunun Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc hukuktan yoksun, kanunlara ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.\u201d
\nKararda, Cumhurba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n se\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemlere ait su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin Anayasal d\u00fczenlemeye ihtiya\u00e7 oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 da \u00e7izildi ve \u201c\u015e\u00fcpheli Abdullah G\u00fcl hakk\u0131nda iddia olunan eylemlerin kan\u0131t ve unsurlar\u0131n mahkemece tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuka uygun olmayan takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir\u201d denildi.
\nKarar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamadaysa \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201cBu davan\u0131n neticesinde, genel ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131 ile genel muhasibin su\u00e7a konu herhangi bir eylemlerinin olmamas\u0131 sebebiyle beraatlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan partinin mali konulardan sorumlu Genel Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve Muhasibi bile beraat ederken, o tarihte d\u0131\u015f ili\u015fkilerden sorumlu genel ba\u015fkan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 olan Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n, san\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 davadan dolay\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheli gibi g\u00f6sterilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kesinlikle iyi niyetle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lamamaktad\u0131r. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n milletvekili olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde, dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na engel olmamas\u0131 sebebiyle Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu Hazine alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tahsili i\u00e7in di\u011fer ki\u015filerle birlikte hakk\u0131nda 1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; Genel Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla g\u00f6revinin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak, mali konularda sorumlulu\u011funun bulunmamas\u0131 sebebiyle davan\u0131n reddine Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 se\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce karar verilmi\u015ftir. Kald\u0131 ki, Anayasaya g\u00f6re Cumhurba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n \u2018vatana ihanet\u2019 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda herhangi bir su\u00e7lama ile yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.\u201d
\nBa\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ve G\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn avukatlar\u0131 mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 istemiyle Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na ba\u015fvurabilecek. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131,isterse Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a ba\u015fvuracak. (Radikal)<\/p>\n

H\u00fck\u00fcmet S\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc \u00c7i\u00e7ek: Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 var<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\nH\u00fck\u00fcmet kanad\u0131nda Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn yarg\u0131lanamayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc dile getirildi. H\u00fck\u00fcmet S\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Cemil \u00c7i\u00e7ek, d\u00fcnk\u00fc Bakanlar Kurulu toplant\u0131s\u0131ndan sonra \u015f\u00f6yle dedi: \u201cAnayasa\u2019n\u0131n 104. maddesine g\u00f6re cumhurba\u015fkanlar\u0131 devletin birli\u011fini temsil eder. \u0130kincisi, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti\u2019ni ve milletin birli\u011fini temsil ederler. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131, devletin kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n uyum i\u00e7inde i\u00e7inde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu 104. maddedeki g\u00f6revler asl\u0131nda 1961 Anayasas\u0131\u2019ndaki g\u00f6revlerle de benze\u015fir. O zaman dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015fti. Bug\u00fcn Anayasa\u2019da ifade edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 bizi dokunulmaz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna g\u00f6t\u00fcrmez. Yani milletvekili i\u00e7in bile dokunulmazl\u0131k varken say\u0131n cumhurba\u015fkanlar\u0131ndan bunun esirgenmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.\u201d
\n\u2018Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 yarg\u0131lanabilir mi?\u2019 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler \u015f\u00f6yle:<\/p>\n

\nTBMM Ba\u015fkan\u0131 K\u00f6ksal Toptan:<\/span><\/em> En az milletvekili dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadar dokunulmazl\u0131\u011fa sahiptir.<\/p>\n

\nAKP Grup Ba\u015fkanvekili Bekir Bozda\u011f:<\/span><\/em> Milletvekillerine yasama dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131yan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n bunu Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019ndan esirgedi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

\nCHP Grup Ba\u015fkanvekili Hakk\u0131 S\u00fcha Okay:<\/span><\/em> Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 yarg\u0131lanabilir, yarg\u0131lanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Milletvekili dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin 1982 Anayasas\u0131\u2019nda d\u00fczenleme yoktur.<\/p>\n

Kaynak : Radikal<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ‘kay\u0131p trilyon davas\u0131’nda Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 G\u00fcl i\u00e7in verdi\u011fi takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. G\u00fcl ise tepkili: Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 yarg\u0131lanamaz.<\/p>\n

ANKARA – Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, kay\u0131p trilyon davas\u0131yla ilgili olarak, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Abdullah G\u00fcl hakk\u0131nda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. Mahkeme karar\u0131nda \u201c\u015e\u00fcphelinin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 olmas\u0131 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}