{"id":67667,"date":"2020-05-11T23:44:00","date_gmt":"2020-05-11T20:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=67667"},"modified":"2026-01-02T08:49:21","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T05:49:21","slug":"yargitay-bassavciligi-demirtasin-cezasinin-bozulmasini-istedi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=67667","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131n cezas\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
\r\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, eski HDP\u00a0 E\u015f Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Selahattin Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda verilen 4 y\u0131l 8 ayl\u0131k hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda, Newroz\u2019da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmalar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek verilen 4 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz talebini inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul 26\u2019\u0131nc\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi. Avukat Mahsuni Karaman, \u201cYarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n talebi karar de\u011fil bir m\u00fctalaad\u0131r. Yani 16. Ceza Dairesi bu m\u00fctalaaya ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fil\u201d dedi. Karaman \u201cEsastan bir bozma iste\u011fi olsayd\u0131 m\u00fctalaa olumlu olabilirdi. Ama bu \u015fekilde eksik bir m\u00fctalaad\u0131r\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesi yapt\u0131.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u0130stanbul 26\u2019\u0131nc\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Halklar\u0131n Demokratik Partisi (HDP) eski E\u015f Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Selahattin Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda, 17 Mart 2013 tarihinde Zeytinburnu\u2019nda d\u00fczenlenen Newroz\u2019da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmalar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek \u201cter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapmak\u201d iddias\u0131yla 4 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Ayn\u0131 dava kapsam\u0131nda HDP\u2019nin eski milletvekillerinden S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder hakk\u0131nda ise, 3 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 verilmi\u015fti. Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM), daha sonra \u00d6nder\u2019in ba\u015fvurusunda hak ihlali karar\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda verilen ceza ise \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi\u2019nde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f, ancak daha sonra \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yarg\u0131 paketiyle temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cTARAFSIZ B\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130LER \u0130NCELEMEL\u0130\u201d<\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Temyiz talebini inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul 26\u2019\u0131nc\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilen tebli\u011fnamede, dosya i\u00e7erisinde bulunan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve yer yer \u201canla\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u201d yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclemedi\u011fi ifade edildi. Tebli\u011fnamede, TRT, T\u00dcB\u0130TAK veya Adli T\u0131p\u2019tan se\u00e7ilebilecek tarafs\u0131z bilirki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan konu\u015fman\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve buna g\u00f6re savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun tayin ve takdirinin gerekti\u011fi belirtildi. Tebli\u011fnamede, buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f eksik \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutana\u011f\u0131 yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp bu y\u00f6ndeki taleplerin reddedilmesinin yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ifade edildi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

SAVUNMA HAKKI KISITLANDI<\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Tebli\u011fnamede, Demirta\u015f\u2019a son savunma i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verilmemesi de bozma nedeni olarak g\u00f6sterilerek, \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi: \u201cEsas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctaalan\u0131n verildi\u011fi celse tutanak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerinin 21 Haziran 2018 tarihinde san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine dair infaz kurumunca tutulmu\u015f tutanak dosyada mevcut ise de; 7 Eyl\u00fcl 2018 tarihli son celse esasa ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapan, kendisine 2 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctaalaya kar\u015f\u0131 son savunmas\u0131n\u0131 yapmak \u00fczere s\u00fcre isteyen ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fctalaan\u0131n 4 Eyl\u00fcl 2018 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi reddedilmek suretiyle yarg\u0131lamaya devamla h\u00fck\u00fcm kurularak CMK\u2019nin 289\/1h maddesi uyar\u0131nca savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan h\u00fckm\u00fcn CMK\u2019nin 302\u2019inci maddesi uyar\u0131nca bozulmas\u0131 talep ve ve dosya tebli\u011f olunur.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Tebli\u011fnamede, ayr\u0131ca Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7a konu c\u00fcmlelerden birinin yanl\u0131\u015f \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlendi\u011fini, konu\u015fman\u0131n bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi halinde su\u00e7a konu s\u00f6zlerin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce ve ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve propaganda su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

AV. KARAMAN: DA\u0130RE KARARI DE\u011e\u0130L<\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Mezopotamya ajans\u0131nda yer alan habere g\u00f6re, Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131ndan Mahsuni Karaman ve F\u0131rat Ep\u00f6zdemir, karara ili\u015fkin Mezopotamya Ajans\u0131 (MA) konu\u015ftu. Av. Mahsuni Karaman, \u201cBu, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131na savc\u0131n\u0131n 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne verdi\u011fi bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yaz\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Bir m\u00fctalaad\u0131r. Yani Daire karar\u0131 de\u011fil. Yani 16. Ceza Dairesi bu m\u00fctalaaya ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fil. 16. Ceza Dairesi temyiz incelemesini yapt\u0131ktan sonra bu m\u00fctalaa do\u011frultusunda karar verebilir. M\u00fctalaan\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7elerle, ayr\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle, ek gerek\u00e7elerle her t\u00fcrl\u00fc karar\u0131 verebilir\u201d \u015feklinde karar\u0131 yorumlad\u0131.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

M\u00dcTALAA EKS\u0130K<\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131n bu dosyada tutuklu ya da h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7eken Karaman, \u201cBu dosya 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda Paris\u2019te \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclen 3 K\u00fcrt kad\u0131n siyaset\u00e7i konu\u015fmas\u0131yla ilgili verilen bir cezayd\u0131. O cezalar zaten h\u00fck\u00fcmet Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131 i\u00e7erde tutman\u0131n yol ve y\u00f6ntemleri olarak hesaplamalar yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zaten o kapsamda S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder\u2019le ilgili Anayasa Mahkemesi hak ihlali karar\u0131 verdi. \u015eimdi bu a\u00e7\u0131dan bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z zaman asl\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa eksik. M\u00fctalaan\u0131n Demirta\u015f\u2019\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fman\u0131n siyasal ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oldu\u011fu i\u00e7erikli olmas\u0131 gerekirdi. Esastan bir bozma iste\u011fi olsayd\u0131 m\u00fctalaa olumlu olabilirdi. Ama bu \u015fekilde eksik bir m\u00fctalaad\u0131r. Savc\u0131 esastan bozma istemini de birlikte sunabilirdi, fakat belki de \u015f\u00f6yle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc: \u00d6ncelikle bu usul sorunlar\u0131 giderilsin daha sonra biz hem g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hem karar bildirelim. Bazen daire de Yarg\u0131tay da b\u00f6yle yapar. E\u011fer usuli bir eksiklik varsa esasa dair olumlu ya da olumsuz bir \u015fey s\u00f6ylemez. Sadece bilirki\u015fi ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 konusunda bozma istemi var\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130 DEFALARCA D\u0130LE GET\u0130RD\u0130K<\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Av. F\u0131rat Ep\u00f6zdemir ise, karar\u0131n esasa de\u011fil usule ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Ep\u00f6zdemir, temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinde bu bozma gerek\u00e7elerinin detayl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ederek, \u201cBizim zaten temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fcz gerek\u00e7elerden baz\u0131lar\u0131yd\u0131. Hen\u00fcz ortada bir bozma karar\u0131 yok. Bizim temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hem usul\u00fc ilgilendiren hem esas\u0131 ilgilendiren gerek\u00e7elerimiz vard\u0131. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n talep etti\u011fi bozma gerek\u00e7eleri bizim temyiz dilek\u00e7emizde aynen yaz\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Bu gerek\u00e7eleri yarg\u0131lama esnas\u0131nda da defalarca s\u00f6yledik. Ama bir an \u00f6nce ceza verelim, karar\u0131 kesinle\u015ftirelim diye hem ilk derece olan 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi hem de \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi, hi\u00e7birini g\u00f6zetmediler\u201d diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Kaynak: www.abcgazetesi.com<\/a><\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, eski HDP E\u015f Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Selahattin Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda verilen 4 y\u0131l 8 ayl\u0131k hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n

Demirta\u015f hakk\u0131nda, Newroz\u2019da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmalar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek verilen 4 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz talebini inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul 26\u2019\u0131nc\u0131 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi. Avukat Mahsuni Karaman, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[3155,5572,5571,1988,5573,5570,162,1192],"class_list":["post-67667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi-aym","tag-av-firat-epozdemir","tag-avukat-mahsuni-karaman","tag-halklarin-demokratik-partisi-hdp","tag-hapis-cezasinin-bozulmasi","tag-istanbul-26inci-agir-ceza-mahkemesi","tag-selahattin-demirtas","tag-yargitay-cumhuriyet-bassavciligi","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}