![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/ykiri_979300148.jpg\")
<\/h2>\n<\/h2>\nAnayasa Mahkemesi eski raport\u00f6r\u00fc Ayd\u0131n: Yeni kimlik kart\u0131n\u0131n yongas\u0131nda gizlenen ve yaln\u0131zca g\u00f6revlilerce g\u00f6r\u00fclebilen din hanesi, laiklik ilkesi gere\u011fi kald\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcm T\u00fcrkiye’de da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131na ba\u015flanan \u00e7ipli kimlik kartlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ilk itiraz \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na iletildi. Anayasa Mahkemesi eski raport\u00f6rlerinden, Hukukta Sol Tav\u0131r Derne\u011fi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ali R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n, <\/strong>\u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvurarak, “Yeni kimlik kart\u0131n\u0131n yongas\u0131nda gizlenen ve yaln\u0131zca g\u00f6revlilerce g\u00f6r\u00fclebilen din hanesi, laiklik ilkesi gere\u011fi kald\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r” dedi.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye genelinde yurtta\u015flara da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmaya ba\u015flanan yeni kimlik kartlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilk itiraz \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na iletildi.\u00a0Anayasa Mahkemesi emekli raport\u00f6rlerinden, Hukukta Sol Tav\u0131r Derne\u011fi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ali R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n, avukat\u0131 Ba\u015fak Ayd\u0131n Tant\u00fcrk\u00fc arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 N\u00fcfus ve Vatanda\u015fl\u0131k \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurarak, \u00e7ipli kimlik kartlar\u0131n\u0131n yongas\u0131nda gizlenen ve yaln\u0131zca g\u00f6revliler taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclebilen din hanesinin laiklik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtip kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n \u0130\u015fte o itiraz dilek\u00e7esi<\/strong><\/p>\n soL’un haberine g\u00f6re, Ali R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n’\u0131n avukat\u0131 Ba\u015fak Ayd\u0131n Tant\u00fcrk\u00fc’n\u00fcn yaz\u0131p sundu\u011fu ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/p>\n \u00c7ankaya \u0130l\u00e7e N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan, kimlik kart\u0131 m\u00fcvekkilim Ali R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n’a teslim edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n M\u00fcvekkilin yeni kimlik kart\u0131 i\u015flemi yap\u0131l\u0131rken, \u0130lgili N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn ekran\u0131nda, \u00f6nceki ‘n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdan\u0131’nda bo\u015f olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ‘dini’ b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, dininin belirtmedi\u011finin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu m\u00fcvekkil taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. G\u00f6revlilerin ifadesi, yeni kimlik kart\u0131nda bu alan\u0131n yonga i\u00e7inde gizli oldu\u011fu ve do\u011frudan g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi \u015feklinde olmu\u015ftur. Benzer a\u00e7\u0131klama, bilgi edinme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada da yer alm\u0131\u015f ve kamuoyuna yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Kart sahibi ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6zle do\u011frudan g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi olanaks\u0131z olan bu alan\u0131n, yasal olarak tan\u0131m\u0131 bile yap\u0131lmayan g\u00f6revliler olan ikinci ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan bir d\u00fczenekle g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi olanakl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 24. maddesindeki, kimsenin ‘dini inan\u00e7 ve kanaatlerini a\u00e7\u0131klamaya zorlanamayaca\u011f\u0131’ h\u00fckm\u00fc hi\u00e7bir istisna, s\u0131n\u0131rlama, kay\u0131t ve ko\u015fula ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm, farkl\u0131 inan\u00e7lara sahip olanlar ya da inanmayanlar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yaln\u0131zca \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin de\u011fil, devletin de yans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in dinsel inanca dayal\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ayr\u0131m bi\u00e7imlerinin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Yonga i\u00e7inde gizlenen bilgiler de bu gere\u011fe dahildir. Din hanesini bo\u015f b\u0131rakma ya da yonga i\u00e7inde gizleme, dinsel inanc\u0131 ve inan\u00e7s\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya koyma anlam\u0131na gelir ki bu da 24. madde kapsam\u0131nda yasakt\u0131r. \u0130HAM\u2019a g\u00f6re, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bir dine ba\u011fl\u0131 olsun, olmas\u0131n ya da dinsel g\u00f6revleri uygulas\u0131n, uygulamas\u0131n herkes i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir. Kimlik, bir dini, dinsel inanc\u0131 ya da inanmamay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa vurmak i\u00e7in ara\u00e7 de\u011fildir, olamaz.<\/p>\n Kimlik, yasal zorunlulu\u011fu olan ve vatanda\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6steren bir belgedir; dinsel inan\u00e7 ya da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceleri kimlikle a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa vurmaya zorlama, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00f6z\u00fcne dokunur; ayr\u0131mc\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flara yol a\u00e7ar. Kimlikte din hanesinin bulunmas\u0131, ki\u015finin iste\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda dinsel durumunun a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131na neden olur. Din hanesinin bo\u015f b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 dahi kamu otoriteleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ay\u0131rt edici bir \u00f6zelli\u011fe sahip olacakt\u0131r. Din hanesinin bo\u015f ya da dolu olmas\u0131 talebi, ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na bireylerin dinsel inanca kar\u015f\u0131 tutumlar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131; bu talebin yaz\u0131l\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 da beyan belgesidir.<\/p>\n Kamusal mercilerden bir istemde bulunulurken din hanesinin dolu ya da bo\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, istemin kabul ya da reddi hususunda etkili oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde yayg\u0131n teredd\u00fctler do\u011furabilece\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla dinin olumlu ya da olumsuz referans olma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zden uzak tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Din hanesinin gizli yongada olmas\u0131 halinde de ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler ve ihlal s\u00f6z konusudur. Gizli de olsa din hanesi hem aile k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde hem de kimlik kart\u0131nda durmaktad\u0131r. K\u00fct\u00fckte, yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan, kimlikte de bir d\u00fczenekle okuma yetkisi olanlar taraf\u0131ndan okunabilecektir. Devlet ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yapmaz. Devletin, bireyin vicdan\u0131yla ilgili olan inan\u00e7lar\u0131n ya da inan\u00e7s\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n d\u0131\u015favurumunda takdir hakk\u0131 yoktur.<\/p>\n Din hanesinin i\u00e7 hukukta yasa ile konulmu\u015f olmas\u0131, bu hanenin dolu\/bo\u015f ya da gizli olmas\u0131 ihlali de\u011fi\u015ftirmez. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 90. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n son t\u00fcmcesine g\u00f6re, usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmu\u015f temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere ili\u015fkin uluslararas\u0131 anla\u015fmalarla kanunlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 konuda farkl\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmler i\u00e7ermesi nedeniyle \u00e7\u0131kabilecek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda uluslararas\u0131 anla\u015fma h\u00fck\u00fcmleri esas al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan, din hanesi konusunda, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019deki N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanunu\u2019nun de\u011fil \u0130HAS h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. \u0130ste\u011fe ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k, kimlik kart\u0131nda \u201cdin hanesi olmama\u201d ko\u015fulunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fildir. \u0130HAM, kimlikte dine ayr\u0131lan hanenin iptal edilmesi gere\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k olarak karar alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Yukardaki nedenlerle, \u00c7ankaya \u0130l\u00e7e N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanarak g\u00f6nderilen T.C. Kimlik Kart\u0131n\u0131n, yongas\u0131nda gizli olarak yer alan din hanesinin t\u00fcm\u00fcyle \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesinden sonra yeniden d\u00fczenlenerek taraf\u0131m\u0131za g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in gere\u011fi arz olunur.<\/p>\n Konuyla ilgili soL’a konu\u015fan Ali R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n, “Anayasan\u0131n laiklik ilkesi gere\u011fi, kimlikte din hanesi olmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi konusunu s\u00fcrekli savunuyoruz. A\u0130HM de bu y\u00f6nde bir karar verdi. T\u00fcrkiye bu karar\u0131 uygulamak yerine, \u00f6nce n\u00fcfus c\u00fczdanlar\u0131ndaki din hanesini bo\u015f b\u0131rakma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131, \u015fimdi de yeni kimlik kartlar\u0131nda din hanesini yongan\u0131n i\u00e7ine gizledi. Ancak bunu ilgililer ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri g\u00f6rme olana\u011f\u0131na sahip. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da laiklik ilkesinin temel kural\u0131 yerine getirilmemi\u015f oluyor. Anayasan\u0131n 90. maddesini de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti kanunlar\u0131 yerine A\u0130HS’nin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle Bakanl\u0131\u011fa ba\u015fvurduk. Bakanl\u0131k anayasa gere\u011fi, talebimizi yerine getirmek durumunda. Ancak getirmezse yarg\u0131 yoluna ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131z” dedi.<\/p>\n \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu talebe nas\u0131l bir yan\u0131t verece\u011fini tahmin ettiklerini ifade eden Ayd\u0131n, s\u00f6zlerini \u015f\u00f6yle s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc:<\/p>\n “Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiyesinde ilgili yasay\u0131 haz\u0131rlayan ve yeni kimlik kartlar\u0131n\u0131 bu hale getiren Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n, talebimizi yerine getirmesini beklemek hayal olur. Ancak usul\u00fc ve prosed\u00fcr\u00fc yerine getirmek i\u00e7in, ayn\u0131 zamanda Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyarmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurduk. Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n olumlu yan\u0131t verece\u011fini tahmin etmiyorum. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yarg\u0131 yolunu kullanaca\u011f\u0131z. \u0130dare mahkemesine ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131z. T\u00fcm i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131 kullanaca\u011f\u0131z.”<\/p>\n
\n\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi (\u0130HAM), \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019ne (\u0130HAS) dayanarak kimlikte din hanesini insan haklar\u0131na, din ve vicdan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulmu\u015f, kimlikte din hanesi olmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini karar alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Avrupa Konseyi de kimlikte din hanesinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye uyar\u0131 mektubu yazm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\nAli R\u0131za Ayd\u0131n: Kimlik kart\u0131nda din hanesi hi\u00e7bir bi\u00e7imde olmamal\u0131<\/h3>\n
“Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebimize olumlu yan\u0131t verece\u011fini tahmin etmiyorum”<\/h3>\n