{"id":63284,"date":"2016-06-22T22:39:46","date_gmt":"2016-06-22T19:39:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=63284"},"modified":"2016-06-22T23:35:55","modified_gmt":"2016-06-22T20:35:55","slug":"hakim-ergulden-5-mufettise-100-bin-tllik-tazminat-davasi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=63284","title":{"rendered":"Hakim Erg\u00fcl\u2019den 5 m\u00fcfetti\u015fe 100 bin TL\u2019lik tazminat davas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-63285\" src=\"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/81107.jpg\" alt=\"81107\" width=\"600\" height=\"268\" \/>\u0130zmir\u2019de polis \u015feflerini tahliye etti\u011fi i\u00e7in HSYK taraf\u0131ndan hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lan ve meslekten uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan Hakim Serdar Erg\u00fcl, be\u015f HSYK m\u00fcfetti\u015fine 100 Bin TL\u2019lik tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gaziantep Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, m\u00fcfetti\u015fler Yunus Nadi Koluk\u0131sa, Hasan Burak \u00c7eviko\u011flu, Kenan \u00d6zdemir, Mustafa Selim \u00d6zcan, Cehdi Cihan Sezen\u2019den 100 bin TL\u2019lik manevi tazminat talep edildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dilek\u00e7ede, Hakim ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n yapt\u0131klar\u0131 yarg\u0131sal i\u015flemler nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davalar\u0131 konusunda g\u00f6revli mahkeme HMK 47 ve CMK 142.maddelerinde d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi belirtildi. Hukuk hakimlerinin g\u00f6revleri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davalar\u0131 ilgili hukuk dairesinde, ceza hakimleri ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flemleri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davalar\u0131n\u0131n ise a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemelerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Dilek\u00e7ede \u015fu ba\u015fl\u0131klar \u00f6n plana \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cM\u00fcfetti\u015flerin yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015flemler yarg\u0131sal faaliyet say\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, m\u00fcfetti\u015f eylemleri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lacak tazminat davalar\u0131nda herhangi bir \u00f6zel d\u00fczenleme bulunmamaktad\u0131r. 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 HSYK 93-a maddesinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile birlikte m\u00fcfetti\u015flerin yapt\u0131klar\u0131 eylemler nedeniyle kendileri aleyhinde haks\u0131z fiil h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nedenle ki\u015fisel kusura dayal\u0131 eldeki dava asliye hukuk mahkemesine a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hakim Erg\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn avukat\u0131 dava gerek\u00e7esi de \u015f\u00f6yle anlatt\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cM\u00fcvekkilim Serdar Erg\u00fcl \u0130zmir 8.A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi hakimi olarak g\u00f6rev yaparken \u0130zmir Adalet Komisyonunun 30.01.2015 tarihli g\u00f6revlendirme yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile 1.Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011finin 01.01.2015 tarihindeki n\u00f6bet ve t\u00fcm di\u011fer i\u015flemlerine bakmakla g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015ftir. G\u00f6revlendirme \u00fczerine 01.01.2015 tarihinde \u0130zmir 1.SCH g\u00f6revine ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve \u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma evraklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00e7ok say\u0131da tutuklama talebi ve arama karar\u0131 verilmesi ile di\u011fer soru\u015fturma i\u015flemleri hakk\u0131nda karar vermi\u015ftir. M\u00fcvekkilim g\u00f6revine devam ederken 01.01.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011fle saatlerinde tutuklu \u015f\u00fcpheliler Taner Ayd\u0131n ve Mehmet Tosun\u2019un m\u00fcdafileri dilek\u00e7e ile m\u00fcracaat ederek tahliye talebinde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r. M\u00fcvekillim yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirme sonucu tutuklu \u015e\u00fcpheliler Taner Ayd\u0131n ve Mehmet Tosun\u2019un m\u00fcdafilerinin tahliye taleplerinin CMK 104.maddesi gere\u011fince karar vermek \u00fczere soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in \u0130zmir C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131 yazarak dosyalar\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn dosyalar tutanakla m\u00fcvekkilime g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcvekillim 01.01.2015 tarihinde dosyalar\u0131 inceleyip usul ve esas\u0131 g\u00f6zeterek gerek\u00e7elerini 02.01.2015 tarih ve\u00a02015-519\u00a0say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile Taner Ayd\u0131n ve Mehmet Tosun\u2019un tahliyesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcvekillimin karar\u0131na Savc\u0131 Okan Bato taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilmi\u015f, itiraz 2.Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fince reddedilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6ylece karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcvekkilimin bu karar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 soru\u015fturma yapmak \u00fczere HSYK m\u00fcfetti\u015fi Ramazan \u00c7etin g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f, \u00c7etin\u2019in g\u00f6revlendirilmesi daha sonra kald\u0131r\u0131larak 07.01.2016 tarihinde ba\u015fm\u00fcfetti\u015f Yunus Nadi Koluk\u0131sa ve di\u011fer m\u00fcfetti\u015fler m\u00fcvekilimin eylemini ara\u015ft\u0131rmak \u00fczere g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fm\u00fcfetti\u015f Ramazan \u00c7etin m\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturmay\u0131 gerektirecek herhangi bir su\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011finden HSYK\u2019n\u0131n istedi\u011fi y\u00f6nde rapor d\u00fczenlemedi\u011fi i\u00e7in HSYK taraf\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131larak adliyen terfi ettirilmemi\u015ftir. Bu hususa a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa alma karar\u0131na muhalefet eden HSYK \u00fcyelerinin muhalefet \u015ferhinde de yer verildi\u011fi gibi \u201cBa\u015fm\u00fcfetti\u015f Ramazan \u00c7etin Aral\u0131k 2015 terfisinin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda terfi kurulu ba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen sicil fi\u015finde ba\u015fka sebepler yan\u0131nda \u0130zmir\u2019de yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n do\u011fru yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle , bu fi\u015f esas al\u0131narak 2.daire \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan A defterinde terfi ettirildi\u011fi\u201d anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda 07.01.2016 tarihinde g\u00f6revlendirilen m\u00fcfetti\u015fler g\u00f6revlendirilmelerinin 25. G\u00fcn\u00fc m\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturmay\u0131 tamamlayarak\u00a0\u00a0m\u00fcvekkilimin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 almadan 02.02.2016\u00a0\u00a0tarihinde g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde rapor haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcvekkilim a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra hakk\u0131ndaki i\u015fleme esas olan t\u00fcm bilgi ve belgelerin kendisine verilmesi i\u00e7in HSYK Genel Sekreterli\u011fine ba\u015fvuruda bulunulmu\u015f ise de; art niyetli olarak s\u00f6z konusu evraklar m\u00fcvekkilime verilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Daval\u0131lar m\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r ithamlar kullanarak yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015f ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla meslekten ihra\u00e7 cezas\u0131 gerektirir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta mesle\u011fin \u015feref ve onurunu bozan ve mesle\u011fe olan genel sayg\u0131 ve g\u00fcveni gideren nitelikte eylemde bulunduklar\u0131, g\u00f6reve devam etmelerinin yarg\u0131 erkinin n\u00fcfuz ve itibar\u0131na zarar verece\u011fi denilerek, g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya ve adli kontrol karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. S\u00f6z konusu daval\u0131lar\u00a0\u00a0bu karar\u0131 imzalayarak olur vermi\u015f olup haks\u0131z i\u015fleme imza atm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcvekkilimin g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tebli\u011f edilen HSYK 2.Dairesine ili\u015fkin 11.02.2016 karar 2016-1 tedbir say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkilimin \u201ctutuklu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tahliyesini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek amac\u0131yla mesleki k\u0131dem ve tecr\u00fcbesinden beklenilmeyecek \u015fekilde kanunun sarih h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini bilerek ihlal etmek suretiyle mesle\u011fin onur ve \u015ferefini bozan ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n selametine, yarg\u0131 erkinin n\u00fcfuz ve itibar\u0131na zarar verece\u011fine kanaat getirilmekle, 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 HSYK Kanunun 77-1ve 81-1 maddeleri gere\u011fince tedbiren 3 ay s\u00fcreyle g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na\u201d gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00fcyeler Mustafa Kemal \u00d6z\u00e7elik ve Mahmut \u015een\u2019in kar\u015f\u0131 oyu ile oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">M\u00fcfetti\u015f taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya konu edilen \u00f6n rapor,\u00a0\u00a0HSYK\u2019ya sunulmadan \u00f6nce m\u00fcvekkil hakk\u0131ndaki su\u00e7lamalarla ilgili m\u00fcvekkilime herhangi bir bilgilendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu eksiklik HSYK taraf\u0131ndan da giderilmeden g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu husus Dan\u0131\u015ftay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na, HSYK Tefti\u015f Kurulu Y\u00f6netmeli\u011finin 39.maddesine ve A\u0130HM\u2019nin 6.maddesine a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Meslek ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131 \u00fczerinde olumsuz sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furmu\u015f olan g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rma karar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmeden \u00f6nce savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilimin lehine olan hi\u00e7bir delilin toplanmamas\u0131 suretiyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ba\u015fm\u00fcfetti\u015f ve di\u011fer m\u00fcfetti\u015fler m\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131ndaki g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rma talepli raporu \u00fczerine m\u00fcvekkilimin g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 11.02.2016 tarihinden bir g\u00fcn sonra Kar\u015f\u0131yaka Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkilime yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 konulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in taleplerde bulunulmu\u015ftur. M\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda gerek soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda ve gerekse m\u00fcfetti\u015flerin haz\u0131rlad\u0131klar\u0131 raporlar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir yerinde m\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda \u201cki\u015fisel verileri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak kaydedilmesi\u201d, \u201cverileri yok etmeme\u201dsu\u00e7lar\u0131 yer almamas\u0131na ve raporda m\u00fcvekkilim ile ilgili b\u00f6yle bir kabul olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen m\u00fcvekkilimin hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 rapor d\u00fczenleyerek bu su\u00e7lardan da yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 konulmas\u0131na karar verilmesini sa\u011flam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu eylemi ile hem g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanm\u0131\u015f hem de resmi evrakta sahtecilik su\u00e7unu i\u015flenmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcvekkilim ile ilgisi olmayan di\u011fer iki su\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sadece m\u00fcfetti\u015f raporuna g\u00f6re iddia olunan g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak su\u00e7u kalmaktad\u0131r ki bu su\u00e7tan yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n konulmas\u0131n\u0131n talep edilmesi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. M\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi yarg\u0131sal karardan dolay\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi alg\u0131s\u0131 olu\u015fturularak, toplumda pe\u015finen su\u00e7lu ilan edilerek itibars\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0S\u00f6z konusu hususlar detayl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde dilek\u00e7ede anlat\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra Hakim Serdar Erg\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn y\u00f6nelik sosyal medyadan \u00f6l\u00fcm tehditlerine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. M\u00fcfetti\u015flerin ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 rapor d\u00fczenleyerek, Hakim Erg\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn verdi\u011fi karardan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc meslekten uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #003366;\">Kaynak :<\/span> <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><a style=\"color: #ff6600;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.haberdar.com\/gundem\/hakim-ergul-den-5-mufettise-100-bin-tl-lik-tazminat-davasi-h35876.html?mnst=13472\" target=\"_blank\">Arzu Y\u0131ld\u0131z &#8211;\u00a0http:\/\/www.haberdar.com\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u0130zmir\u2019de polis \u015feflerini tahliye etti\u011fi i\u00e7in HSYK taraf\u0131ndan hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lan ve meslekten uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan Hakim Serdar Erg\u00fcl, be\u015f HSYK m\u00fcfetti\u015fine 100 Bin TL\u2019lik tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gaziantep Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, m\u00fcfetti\u015fler Yunus Nadi Koluk\u0131sa, Hasan Burak \u00c7eviko\u011flu, Kenan \u00d6zdemir, Mustafa Selim \u00d6zcan, Cehdi Cihan Sezen\u2019den 100 bin TL\u2019lik manevi <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[3086,3037,3085,3082,118,3083,3084,3080,3081],"class_list":["post-63284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","tag-100-bin-tllik-tazminat-davasi","tag-arzu-yildiz","tag-cehdi-cihan-sezen","tag-hasan-burak-cevikoglu","tag-hsyk","tag-kenan-ozdemir","tag-mustafa-selim-ozcan","tag-serdar-ergul","tag-yunus-nadi-kolukisa","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=63284"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63284\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=63284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=63284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=63284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}