{"id":60906,"date":"2015-10-20T14:11:05","date_gmt":"2015-10-20T11:11:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=60906"},"modified":"2015-10-20T22:10:12","modified_gmt":"2015-10-20T19:10:12","slug":"mahkemeden-ataturkun-vasiyeti-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=60906","title":{"rendered":"Mahkemeden ‘Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn vasiyeti’ karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"201020151413320097844_2\"<\/a>ATAT\u00dcRK Orman \u00c7iftli\u011fi (AO\u00c7)’nde vasiyeti ihlal davas\u0131 26’nc\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. AO\u00c7’de Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn vasiyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, 26’nc\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc duru\u015fmada reddedildi.
Mahkeme, Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki AO\u00c7’de plan yapma yetkisinin devrine ili\u015fkin kanun maddesinin itirazen g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc davadaki karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdi. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Tezcan Karaku\u015f Candan, dava sonucuna ili\u015fkin olarak “Atat\u00fcrk Orman \u00c7iftli\u011fi davam\u0131zda vasiyeti ihlalde mahkeme ret karar\u0131 verdi. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131; Saray’da mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 uygulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, oturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Melih G\u00f6k\u00e7ek, mahkeme karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Ankapark’\u0131 ticari demir y\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131na \u00e7eviriyor. B\u00f6yle hukuk tan\u0131mazl\u0131k ve ard\u0131ndan 4. duru\u015fmada aniden verilen bu ret karar\u0131 ile hukuka olan inanc\u0131m\u0131z sars\u0131l\u0131yor” dedi.<\/p>\n

“DAVANIN YARGITAY’DAN D\u00d6NECE\u011e\u0130NE OLAN \u0130NANCIMIZ TAMDIR”<\/strong>
Ankara Adliyesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klama yapan Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Candan, dava sonucunu de\u011ferlendirerek “Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn vasiyetine sahip \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131z i\u00e7in Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn \u00e7ocu\u011fu olmam\u0131za gerek yok. Bu normal bir vasiyet davas\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu anlay\u0131\u015ftan T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti de ma\u011fdurdur. Hepimiz de ma\u011fduruz. Atat\u00fcrk Orman \u00c7iftli\u011fi bu \u00fclkenin kurucusu taraf\u0131ndan bize emanet edilmi\u015ftir. Atat\u00fcrk Orman \u00c7iftli\u011fi’ndeki talan\u0131n, Saray’\u0131n, Ankapark’\u0131n pe\u015fini b\u0131rakmayaca\u011f\u0131z. Talan s\u00fcrecine ortak olan herkes yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hesap verecek. Davan\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay’dan d\u00f6nece\u011fine olan inanc\u0131m\u0131z tamd\u0131r. Bu dava bitmez” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

“REDDED\u0130LEN, DEMOKRAS\u0130D\u0130R”<\/strong>
Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eubesi Bas\u0131n Birimi’nden yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamaya g\u00f6re Candan, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda \u015fu ifadeleri kulland\u0131: “Umutlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 k\u0131ramazlar. AO\u00c7 d\u00fc\u015flerimizi yok edemezler. AO\u00c7, a\u011fa\u00e7lar\u0131n dal\u0131ndan meyvesini yiyece\u011fimiz, g\u00f6lgesinde serinleyece\u011fimiz, a\u011fa\u00e7lar\u0131n alt\u0131nda oturup soluklanaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ve demokrasinin alan\u0131 olacak. Biz de bunu g\u00f6rece\u011fiz. Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, c\u00fcbbelerini, temsiliyetlerini cumhuriyete bor\u00e7lu olanlar bilmelidir ki reddettikleri bu dava ile reddedilen, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n gelece\u011fidir, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckt\u00fcr, demokrasidir”<\/p>\n

Kaynak : ANKARA, (DHA)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ATAT\u00dcRK Orman \u00c7iftli\u011fi (AO\u00c7)’nde vasiyeti ihlal davas\u0131 26’nc\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. AO\u00c7’de Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn vasiyetinin ihlal edildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, 26’nc\u0131 Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc duru\u015fmada reddedildi.Mahkeme, Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2006 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki AO\u00c7’de plan yapma yetkisinin devrine ili\u015fkin kanun maddesinin itirazen g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc davadaki karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdi. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Ankara \u015eube Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Tezcan Karaku\u015f <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}