{"id":51275,"date":"2012-05-09T12:28:00","date_gmt":"2012-05-09T09:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=51275"},"modified":"2012-05-09T13:20:13","modified_gmt":"2012-05-09T10:20:13","slug":"iste-bakanliga-giden-dilekcenin-tam-metni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=51275","title":{"rendered":"\u0130\u015fte bakanl\u0131\u011fa giden dilek\u00e7enin tam metni…"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u0130\u015fte avukatlar I\u015f\u0131k ile Erol’un, Fenerbah\u00e7e Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m hakk\u0131nda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na verilen dilek\u00e7enin tam metni.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI<\/p>\n

Kanun Yarar\u0131na Bozma Talebinde Bulunan : Aziz YILDIRIM<\/p>\n

M\u00fcdafiileri : Av. Faik I\u015eIK \u2013 Av. Abdurrahim Erol<\/p>\n

Bozulmas\u0131 Talep Edilen Mahkeme Karar\u0131: \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (CMK m 250 ile yetkili b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc) 2011\/63 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen tutuklama ve tutuklaman\u0131n devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin ara kararlar, yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131 ret kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n

\u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEME S\u00dcREC\u0130NDEK\u0130 HUKUKA AYKIRILIKLARIN G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130NDE KANUN YARARINA BOZMADAN BA\u015eKA B\u0130R \u0130MKANININ KALMAMASI; KALDIRILMI\u015e OLAN DGM\u2019N\u0130N Y\u00d6NTEMLER\u0130N\u0130N HALEN UYGULANMASI ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da \u00f6zetle zikredilen sebeplerle m\u00fcvekkil Fenerbah\u00e7e ba\u015fkan\u0131 Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n (ve elbette benzer durumdaki di\u011fer \u00e7aresiz san\u0131klar\u0131n) TAHL\u0130YELER\u0130N\u0130 REDDEREK KEND\u0130 VERD\u0130KLER\u0130 TUTUKLAMA KARARLARINI KORUYAN, CMK 268nci UYARINCA S\u00dcREKL\u0130 AYNI Y\u00d6NTEM\u0130 KULLANMAK SURET\u0130YLE G\u00d6REV\u0130 \/ YETK\u0130Y\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANMA EYLEM\u0130N\u0130 GER\u00c7EKLE\u015eT\u0130REN \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEME KARARLARININ KANUN LEH\u0130NE BOZULMASI talebimiz (CMK 309) hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkil Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m ve hi\u00e7 alakas\u0131 olmayan olaylar ve ki\u015filerin dosyaya eklenmesi (TORBA SU\u00c7LAMA) suretiyle, ilgisiz 93 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir araya getirildi\u011fi; bu san\u0131klardan Giresunsporlu ve Fenerbah\u00e7eli olanlar\u0131n soru\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri ileti\u015fimleri izlenip fiziksel takipleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde herkes\u00e7e art\u0131k iyice bilinen baz\u0131 tak\u0131mlarda di\u011ferlerine k\u0131yasla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 birka\u00e7 ki\u015fisinin ligin bitimine yak\u0131n izlemeye al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131; b\u00f6ylelikle tak\u0131mlara ve ki\u015filere g\u00f6re farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve ayr\u0131ca TFF s\u0131nav\u0131 gibi ilgisiz konularla soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n SAVUNMA YAPMAYI \u0130MKANSIZLA\u015eTIRMA VE ZORLA\u015eTIRMA sonucunu do\u011furacak surette HAC\u0130MLEND\u0130R\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130; resmi makamlar\u0131n kameralar\u0131 e\u015fli\u011finde \u00e7ekilmi\u015f ve medyaya ancak resmen servis edilebilir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin televizyonlarda, gazetelerde, internet ortam\u0131nda SANSASYONEL L\u0130N\u00c7 uygulamas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc; 9 AYRI ZAMANDA DALGALI SORU\u015eTURMA a\u015famalar\u0131yla S\u00dcRE\u00c7LER\u0130N YAYILARAK TUTUKLULAR ALEYH\u0130NE UZATILDI\u011eI; bu s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde DOSYADA G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K KARARLARIYLA \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ve avukatlar\u0131n \u00e7aresiz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; savunma kurumunun fonksiyonsuzla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n ancak devletin namus ve emniyetine teslim edilmi\u015f KARAKOLDA \u00c7EK\u0130LM\u0130\u015e \u00d6NDEN VE YANDAN E\u015eKAL FOTO\u011eRAFLARININ yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; CMK 91 ve 94 uyar\u0131nca maksimum 4 g\u00fcn olan G\u00d6ZALTI S\u00dcRES\u0130N\u0130N Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m i\u00e7in 8 G\u00dcN OLARAK UYGULANDI\u011eI; MAHKEME DAHA BA\u015eLAMADAN \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda \u201c19 ma\u00e7ta \u015fike kesin, delilleri g\u00f6r\u00fcnce konu\u015famad\u0131lar\u201d diye RESM\u0130 MAKAMLARCA YARGILAMA OLMAKSIZIN SU\u00c7LULU\u011eUN \u0130LAN ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130; ilan edilen bu su\u00e7lulu\u011fa paralel olarak TUTUKLAMA \u0130LE \u015e\u0130MD\u0130DEN \u0130LAN ED\u0130LM\u0130\u015e \u0130LER\u0130DE USULEN YARGILAMA A\u015eAMALARINDAN GE\u00c7\u0130R\u0130LEREK H\u00dcKME D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eECEK mahkumiyetin PE\u015e\u0130N ya da \u00d6N\u00d6DEMEL\u0130 \u0130NFAZ halinde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu s\u00fcre\u00e7teki hukuksal ar\u0131zalardan dolay\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u015fikayet ve ba\u015fvurular\u0131n MESLEK\u0130 veya ba\u015fkaca t\u00fcrde bir dayan\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7erisinde REDDED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 B\u0130R YAPILANMANIN VARLI\u011eI; ancak askeriyede ve poliste g\u00f6r\u00fclen KOZM\u0130K ODA UYGULAMASI denilen bir uygulaman\u0131n T\u00fcrk Hukuk tarihine kaz\u0131narak yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; bu oda da \u015f\u00fcpheliler ve avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n bilmedi\u011fi delillerin UEFA yetkililerine KES\u0130N \u015e\u0130KE olarak anlat\u0131larak i\u011ffal edildi\u011fi (UEFA yetkililerinin imzal\u0131 ifadeleri var bu konuda); bu suretle Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n ba\u015fkan\u0131 oldu\u011fu kul\u00fcb\u00fcn \u015eampiyonlar Ligine gitmesinin yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131; \u201cs\u0131f\u0131r tolerans\u201d tekerlemesine ra\u011fmen ayn\u0131 dosya i\u00e7erisinde isimleri bulunan tak\u0131mlar\u0131n uluslar aras\u0131 m\u00fcsabakalara gitmelerinin sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131; sab\u0131ka kay\u0131tlar\u0131 pek az faniye nasip olur tarzda dolu dolu birka\u00e7 \u015fahs\u0131n \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemeler aras\u0131nda MOB\u0130L G\u0130ZL\u0130 TANIK olarak gezindirildi\u011fi; S\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim mahkemelerinde dahi g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen G\u0130ZL\u0130 TANIK, G\u0130ZL\u0130 DOSYA, G\u0130ZL\u0130 \u0130DD\u0130ANAMELER\u0130N vak\u2019a-y\u0131 adiyeden oldu\u011fu; 8 AY S\u00dcREN izleme, dinleme, takibe ek olarak 5 AY s\u00fcren iddianame (ki, bu d\u00f6nemde de izlemeler ve dinlemeler devam ettirilmi\u015ftir) ve iddianamenin kabul\u00fcnden bu yana ge\u00e7en 6 AYLIK KOVU\u015eTURMA s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde; (4,5 ay sonra \u00e7\u0131kacak) 6222 say\u0131l\u0131 YASADA \u00d6NG\u00d6R\u00dcLECEK SU\u00c7LARI CEZALANDIRMAYA Y\u00d6NEL\u0130K POL\u0130S VE YARGI \u0130\u015eB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 ile \u015fike soru\u015fturmas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131; sorgudaki \u015fike sorular\u0131n\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yap\u0131lan itirazdan sonra iddianame a\u015famas\u0131nda (olmayan yasaya dayal\u0131 \u015fike soru\u015fturmas\u0131) hatas\u0131n\u0131n DOLANDIRICILIK TAVS\u0130F\u0130 \u0130LE KAMUFLE ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130; \u00c7OK FA\u0130LL\u0130 HER SU\u00c7 hakk\u0131nda OLA\u011eAN\u00dcST\u00dc YETK\u0130LER ve OLA\u011eANDI\u015eI YARGI Y\u00d6NTEMLER\u0130 uygulanabilmesini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in \u00d6RG\u00dcT KAVRAMININ MAYMUNCUK HAL\u0130NE GET\u0130R\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130; b\u00f6ylelikle ki\u015filerin hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin POL\u0130S\u0130N \u00d6D\u00dcL Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130\u011e\u0130NE (\u00f6d\u00fcle esas al\u0131nan puan cetveli uyar\u0131nca \u00f6rg\u00fct olarak yarg\u0131latma ve tutuklatma halinde 24 aya kadar maa\u015f \u00f6d\u00fcl\u00fc ve ba\u015far\u0131 yar\u0131\u015f\u0131nda puan toplanmas\u0131na yarayan menfaatlere) KURBAN ED\u0130LMES\u0130; kamuoyunda B\u00d6YLECE \u0130STEN\u0130RSE HER \u015eAHSIN H\u00dcK\u00dcMDEN \u00d6NCE MAHKUMMU\u015e gibi itibars\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi tedirginli\u011finin yayg\u0131nla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131; D\u0130Z \u00c7\u00d6KT\u00dcR\u00dcLMEM\u0130\u015e VE KORKUTULMAMI\u015e H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R YURTTA\u015eIN KALMAMASI SONUCUNU DO\u011eURACAK BU UYGULAMALARA sessiz kal\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 (avukat olarak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc dinleme ve takip alt\u0131nda olmam\u0131za ra\u011fmen DGM\u2019lerden ve 28 \u015eubatta tanklar\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi Sincan davas\u0131 da dahil hi\u00e7bir davada inand\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z ve bildi\u011fimiz do\u011frular \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130NSANCA + DEMOKRAT + TARAFSIZ + IRKSIZ + MEZHEPS\u0130Z + ME\u015eREPS\u0130Z + CEMAATSIZ + kendi \u00fcyeleri ve taraftarlar\u0131 i\u00e7in dernekle\u015fmemi\u015f UYGARCA B\u0130R HUKUKUN GEREKLER\u0130N\u0130 YALVARMADAN D\u0130Z \u00c7\u00d6KMEDEN TALEP ETMEKTEN ve ba\u015f\u0131m\u0131za gelecek olanlar\u0131n adreslerini bu dilek\u00e7emizde belirterek korkmadan, 28 \u015eubat s\u00fcrecinde ma\u011fdur olanlar\u0131n avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapmaktan dolay\u0131 A\u011eIR CEZA MAHKEMELER\u0130NDE -\u201cO. Ka\u00e7maz hakk\u0131mda bas\u0131n yoluyla Yarg\u0131tay 8. Dairesi ba\u015fta olmak DGM\u2019ye hakaretten 2 y\u0131l sonra iddianame d\u00fczenleyerek dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u201d- PE\u015ePE\u015eE \u0130HZARLARLA B\u0130RB\u0130RLER\u0130NDEN AYRI \u015eEH\u0130RLERDE ifadem al\u0131narak) 9 + 3 + 2 y\u0131l s\u00fcren davalarda yarg\u0131lanan bir yurtta\u015f olarak); oy verdi\u011fimiz ve verilmesini istedi\u011fimiz bir iktidar d\u00f6neminde kendi arkada\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n husumetlerini kazanmaktan ve itilip kak\u0131lmaktan \u00e7ekinmeden; 19 AYDIR DEL\u0130L DURUMU + KARARTMA \u015e\u00dcPHES\u0130 + ATILI SU\u00c7 G\u0130B\u0130 \u015eABLON GEREK\u00c7ELER\u0130N TEKRARIYLA ne zaman ayd\u0131nlanaca\u011f\u0131 belli olmayan ve SA\u011eLAMLI\u011eINA G\u00dcVEN\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 A\u00c7IK OLDU\u011eU gibi bir \u00d6NEML\u0130 KISMI HUKUKA AYKIRI delillerle tutukluluk hali s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m ad\u0131na vekaleten \u015eU TALEPTE BULUNUYORUZ:<\/p>\n

TBMM\u2019nde \u201coybirli\u011fi ile\u201d kald\u0131r\u0131lan DGM\u2019lerdeki \u201cYAKALAMADAN TUTUKLAMAYA, D\u0130NLEMEDEN ARAMAYA KADAR KEND\u0130LER\u0130NCE VER\u0130LEN KARARLARA \u0130T\u0130RAZ ED\u0130LEN HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N, \u0130T\u0130RAZLARI DA \u0130NCELEY\u0130P RET KARARLARI VEREREK KEND\u0130 KARARLARINI KOLLARKEN SANIKLAR VE SAVUNMA AVUKATLARI \u0130\u00c7\u0130N B\u00dcT\u00dcN YOLLARI TIKADIKLARI; CMK 140\u2019daki teknik ara\u00e7larla izleme (fiziki takip) \/ ileti\u015fimin denetlenmesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131 veren hakimlerin TUTUKLAMA ve buna itiraz halinde verilen \u0130T\u0130RAZI RET s\u00fcrecine kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131; bu dilek\u00e7emiz ekindeki belgelerden veya dosyan\u0131n asl\u0131ndan veya UYAP \u00fczerinden delillerini g\u00f6rmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. T\u00c2B\u0130\u0130 HAK\u0130M ve OLA\u011eAN OLMAYAN Y\u00d6NTEMLERLE YARGILANMA, bir l\u00fctuf de\u011fil; insanl\u0131k haysiyeti ve hukuki bir gerekliliktir.<\/p>\n

Cinsel taciz su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n faillerinin ve h\u0131rs\u0131zlar\u0131n, hakaret ve iftira su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fleyenlerin, silah kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece \u015fantaj ve tehdit gibi su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015fleyenlerin, trafik canavar\u0131 olmu\u015f sarho\u015f s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin yaralamal\u0131 kazalar\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011funlukla tutuksuz yarg\u0131lama uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen bir \u00fclkede; konusu futbol topu olan ve 12 Eyl\u00fcl 2011 tarihli referandum ile Anayasaya eklenen (madde 59\/3) h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince T\u00fcrkiye Futbol Federasyonu Tahkim Kurulu\u2019nun kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 yarg\u0131 yoluna dahi ba\u015fvurulamaz iken, Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m (ve dava kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n) 6222 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kapsam\u0131nda alt ve \u00fcst ceza s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 1-3 y\u0131l olan bir su\u00e7lamadan dolay\u0131 11 AYDIR TUTUKLU KALMASINDA ISRAR ED\u0130LMES\u0130, ancak (466 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa yerine konulan) 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 142. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca haks\u0131z yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklamadan berat edilirse do\u011facak tazminat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in YARGILAMANIN SONUNDA mutlaka bir ceza verilece\u011finin g\u00f6stergesidir denemez mi? O zaman yarg\u0131lamaya ne gerek kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r? \u00d6N\u00d6DEMEL\u0130 yada PE\u015e\u0130N \u0130NFAZA D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eM\u00dc\u015e UZUN TUTUKLULUK s\u00fcrelerinin ileride verilecek h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de kamuoyu nazar\u0131nda \u015fimdiden tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 h\u00e2le getirmez mi?<\/p>\n

DGM yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131ndaki TUTUKLU ORANI ve TUTUKLAMA S\u00dcRELER\u0130 ile \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerin y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri davalardaki TUTUKLU SAYISI, DAVA VE TUTUKLULUK S\u00dcRELER\u0130 konusunda bir k\u0131yaslama yap\u0131l\u0131rsa; DGM\u2019leri kald\u0131rd\u0131k diye sevinebilmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr?<\/p>\n

6222 say\u0131l\u0131 yasada (6250 ve 6259) de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131l\u0131rken cezalar\u0131n alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan CEZADAN BA\u015eKACA B\u0130R TEDB\u0130RE \u00c7EVR\u0130LMES\u0130, ceza hukuku sistemati\u011fi bozulmak pahas\u0131na engellenirken; e\u015fitlik ilkesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil edici AYIRT ED\u0130C\u0130 \u00d6ZEL UYGULAMA tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 tutanaklardan d\u00f6k\u00fclmemektedir? K\u0131saca bir tedbire \u00e7evrilmemesi i\u00e7in s\u00fcrekli bask\u0131lar kuran ki\u015filerin aras\u0131nda; kutsal sayd\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun devleti (hukuk devletinden farkl\u0131d\u0131r \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc) kendi i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 CEZADAN BA\u015eKACA B\u0130R TEDB\u0130RE \u00c7EVR\u0130LME SAYES\u0130NDE sab\u0131kal\u0131 say\u0131lmayarak milletvekili olmu\u015f ki\u015filer yok mudur? Hen\u00fcz h\u00fck\u00fcm giymemi\u015f ancak se\u00e7ilmi\u015f ki\u015filerin YSK\u2019ca adayl\u0131klar\u0131nda bir engel yok iken; en az\u0131ndan tutuksuz yarg\u0131lanmaya raz\u0131 iken yemin dahi ettirilmemesi bir tuhafl\u0131k de\u011fil midir? G\u00f6rev su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 baz\u0131lar\u0131 y\u00fcce divan s\u0131fat\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinde yarg\u0131lan\u0131rken, baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n sanki Anayasa mahkemesine bir nevi g\u00fcvensizlikle su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kolay kurtulur ve tutuksuz yarg\u0131lan\u0131r d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceleri ile \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerin g\u00f6rev ve yetki alan\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00e7eli\u015fki de\u011fil midir? M\u0130T m\u00fcste\u015far\u0131n\u0131n bile g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gayretleri sabahlar\u0131 erkenceden gazetelere ve televizyon haberlerine bak\u0131p kendinden bahsedilmesinden ho\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 izlenimi veren JUR\u0130STOKRAS\u0130N\u0130N okey masalar\u0131nda \u201cben senden daha m\u00fchim birini tutuklayaca\u011f\u0131m\u201d yar\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 and\u0131rmaz m\u0131?<\/p>\n

\u0130lgin\u00e7tir ki; \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER\u0130N, DGM\u2019LER\u0130N KADRO \/ TE\u015eK\u0130LAT YAPISINA paralel yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde 7 May\u0131s 2004 (tam dokuz y\u0131l \u00f6nce bug\u00fcn) 5170 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile TC Anayasas\u0131n\u0131n Baz\u0131 Maddelerinin De\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun ile DGM\u2019lerin anayasal dayana\u011f\u0131 olan Anayasan\u0131n 143.maddesi kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

16 Haziran 2004 tarihinde kabul edilen ve 30 Haziran 2004 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 5190 Say\u0131l\u0131 CEZA MUHAKEMELER\u0130 USUL\u00dc HAKKINDA DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130KL\u0130K YAPILMASI VE DGM\u2019LER\u0130N KALDIRILMASINA DA\u0130R KANUN ile uygulamada pek \u00e7ok ma\u011fduriyetlere yol a\u00e7an YARGI UYGULAMALARININ KALDIRILMASI ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f idi. 5190 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun DGM\u2019leri kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rken 1. Maddesi ile \u201c1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanununa 394\u00fcnc\u00fc maddeden sonra gelmek \u00fczere, 394\/a, 394\/b, 394c, 394d bentleri ile me\u015fhur olmu\u015f ad\u0131yla \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER kurulmu\u015ftur. 4 Aral\u0131k 2004 tarihinde kabul edilen CEZA MUHAKEMES\u0130 KANUNU\u2019nun 250, 251 ve 252nci maddelerinde; bu \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 yeniden tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kald\u0131r\u0131lan Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemeleri; \u201cdevletin i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f g\u00fcvenli\u011fini ilgilendiren su\u00e7lara bakmakla g\u00f6revli\u201d olmak SINIRLI B\u0130R YETK\u0130 \u0130LE \u00fczere kurulmu\u015f idi. DGM\u2019ler; S\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim Mahkemelerinin hukuk sistemine verdi\u011fi zararlar\u0131n sonucunda bir ge\u00e7i\u015f a\u015famas\u0131 niteli\u011finde idi. Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemeleri, 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda TBMM\u2019nde sadece iki parti bulundu\u011fundan; h\u00fck\u00fcmetteki AKPART\u0130 ve tek muhalefetteki CHP\u2019sinin ortak oylar\u0131 ile yurtta\u015flarca ya\u015fanan ac\u0131lar ve T\u00fcrkiye Devletinin sayg\u0131nl\u0131k ve imaj\u0131na verdi\u011fi zararlar\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak yan\u0131nda \u00f6zellikle DEMOKRAT\u0130KLE\u015eME VE AB \u0130LE UYUM SA\u011eLAMA amac\u0131yla kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. OYSA \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER, paralel polis y\u00f6ntemleri sayesinde maymuncuk olarak kullan\u0131lan \u00d6RG\u00dcT kavram\u0131nda DGM\u2019LERLE KIYASLANMAYACAK \u015eEK\u0130LDE ALANLARINDA SINIR TANIMAKSIZIN AYRICALIKLI YARGI YETK\u0130LER\u0130 KULLANMAKTADIRLAR.<\/p>\n

Kamuoyuna \u015fike davas\u0131 diye lanse edilen \u00f6zel yetkili \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (CMK m 250 ile yetkili) 2011\/63 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen tutuklama ve tutuklaman\u0131n devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin ara kararlar, yap\u0131lan itirazlar\u0131 ret kararlar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde g\u00f6r\u00fclecektir ki; OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130LE KALDIRILAN DGM UYGULAMALARI MAALESEF DEVAM ETMEKTED\u0130R.<\/p>\n

S\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim ve Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemeleri d\u00f6nemindeki yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 aratacak \u015fekilde neredeyse \u00d6NCEDEN BEL\u0130RL\u0130 L\u0130STEDK\u0130 HERKES\u0130 TUTUKLAYARAK yarg\u0131lama y\u00f6nteminin, \u201c\u0130LER\u0130DE VER\u0130LMES\u0130 KES\u0130N OLARAK KABUL ED\u0130LEN CEZANIN \u0130CRASI \u015feklinde yayg\u0131n uygulama haline getirilmesi ger\u00e7e\u011finin vicdanlar\u0131 yaralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Say\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n, \u201cTUTUKLULARI H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcLER\u0130NDEN FAZLA B\u0130R \u00dcLKE OLMANIN T\u00dcRK\u0130YE\u2019YE YAKI\u015eMADI\u011eI VE BUNUN ADALETS\u0130ZL\u0130K OLDU\u011eUNU\u201d s\u00f6zleriyle \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde dile getirmi\u015ftir. (Ekte belgesi konulmu\u015ftur). Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve H\u00fck\u00fcmet s\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Say\u0131n B\u00fclent ARIN\u00c7\u2019\u0131n, Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Say\u0131n Ali BABACAN\u2019\u0131n, Adalet Bakan\u0131m\u0131z Sadullah ERG\u0130N\u2019in, Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m KAYNAK\u2019\u0131n, Barolar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n, Ceza Hukuku \u00d6\u011fretim \u00fcyelerimizin, pek \u00e7ok yarg\u0131 mensubumuzun ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 sesli g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc pek \u00e7ok medya organ\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini a\u00e7\u0131klayan yazar ve konu\u015fmac\u0131lardan da \u00f6te ve her \u015feyden \u00f6nemlisi T.C. yurtta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00dcKSEK SESLE D\u0130LE GET\u0130RD\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u201cg\u00f6r\u00fcp duymakla\u201d; H\u00dcK\u00dcMET S\u00d6ZC\u00dcS\u00dc VE BA\u015eBAKAN YARDIMCISI SAYIN B\u00dcLENT ARIN\u00c7, kamuoyunda \u00e7ok konu\u015fulan bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda verilen \u201cTAHL\u0130YE KARARININ, BA\u015eKA DAVALARDA DA \u00d6RNEK OLMASINI, D\u0130\u011eER MAHKEMELER VE HEYETLER\u0130N DE TAHL\u0130YE KARARLARI VERMEYE BA\u015eLAMALARI GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130, TUTUKLU YARGILAMA HAL\u0130N\u0130N \u0130ZAHININ M\u00dcMK\u00dcN OLMADI\u011eINI\u201d vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve y\u00f6neticileri \u0131srarla tutukluluk s\u00fcrecinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmayan Fenerbah\u00e7e Spor Kul\u00fcb\u00fcn\u00fcn voleybol, basketbol ve b\u00fct\u00fcn bran\u015flarda ba\u015far\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi yan\u0131nda; futbol bran\u015f\u0131n\u0131n da hem S\u00dcPER L\u0130GDE hem de T\u00dcRK\u0130YE KUPASINDA finali oynamas\u0131; b\u00fct\u00fcn taraftarlara BU DA MI \u015e\u0130KE sorusunu sordurmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve y\u00f6netimi tutuklu, \u00f6nemli oyuncular\u0131 \u00fcrk\u00fct\u00fclerek g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f, borsadaki de\u011feri sars\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, b\u00fct\u00fcn oyuncular\u0131 ve antren\u00f6rleri a\u011f\u0131r bir psikolojik bask\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki futbol bran\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bu \u015fartlar alt\u0131nda dahi b\u00fcy\u00fck ba\u015far\u0131lar elde etti\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131na mazeret arayanlar ile hayatta mazarrat \u00e7\u0131karmakla ge\u00e7im ve itibar sa\u011flayanlar\u0131n inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulanmayacak m\u0131d\u0131r?<\/p>\n

Sadece ikametgah\u0131 de\u011fil t\u00fcm malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve MEZAR YER\u0130 T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de olan Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m -(bug\u00fcn itibariyle) 309 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr tutukludur- Fenerbah\u00e7e kul\u00fcb\u00fcn\u00fcn kongresine METR\u0130S Ceza ve Tutukevinden kat\u0131lmak zorunda b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kongreye kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 imkans\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131rmakt\u0131r. S\u00fcper lig finali ve T\u00fcrkiye kupa finalinde oynamay\u0131; hi\u00e7bir tak\u0131m\u0131n maruz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklara ra\u011fmen hak etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumu da biraz espri ile \u201cdemek ki, \u015fike \u015fike\u201d diye dile getirmektedir. \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin (CMK m 250 ile yetkili b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc) 2011\/63 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen TUTUKLAMA KARARI ile bunlara ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan \u0130T\u0130RAZLARIN REDD\u0130NE \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N B\u0130RB\u0130R\u0130N\u0130N TEKRARI KARARLAR, kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f DGM benzeri KARARLARINA \u0130T\u0130RAZ ED\u0130LEN HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N HER SEFER\u0130NDE \u0130T\u0130RAZ \u0130NCELEMELER\u0130NE DE KATILMALARI VE \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER\u0130N YAPISI \u0130LE HSYK \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130LER\u0130 KONUSUNDAK\u0130 SIKINTI VE A\u00c7MAZLAR yan\u0131nda adil yarg\u0131lanma ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 deliller gibi dilek\u00e7emizde a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z b\u00fct\u00fcn hususlar kapsam\u0131nda; A\u0130HM\u2019ne ba\u015fvuru yapma ihtiyac\u0131 do\u011fmas\u0131na gerek olmayacak \u015fekilde T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti yurtta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 ve taleplerini; bu devletin se\u00e7ilmi\u015f ve atanm\u0131\u015f yetkili ve g\u00f6revlileri \u00e7\u00f6zmeye gayret edeceklerine inanmak istiyoruz. H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R YURTTA\u015e ADALET\u0130 \u00dcLKES\u0130 DI\u015eINDA ARAMAK \u0130\u00c7\u0130N \u0130NSAN HAKLARI S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130NE ve \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurmak zorunda BIRAKILMAMALIDIR.<\/p>\n

I- A\u00c7IKLAMALAR :<\/strong><\/p>\n

1- S\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim Mahkemeleri yerine kurulan DGM\u2019leri; demokratikle\u015fme ve AB ile uyum projesi kapsam\u0131nda TBMM\u2019miz y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131rken; DGM\u2019ler yerine kurulan \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER\u0130 de 4-5 senelik k\u0131sa d\u00f6nem i\u00e7erisindeki uygulamalar\u0131yla AYNI SORUNLARA neden olmaya ba\u015flay\u0131nca; YAYGIN VE UZUN TUTUKLULUK S\u00dcRELER\u0130YLE B\u0130TMEYEN DAVALAR nedeniyle say\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131, Ba\u015fbakan, Adalet Bakan\u0131 ve y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fkanlar\u0131 ile kamuoyunun \u00f6nemli bir kesimi taraf\u0131ndan ele\u015ftirilmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rg\u00fct kavram\u0131n\u0131n DGM d\u00f6neminden daha yayg\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131yla \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemeler, N\u0130HAYET\u0130NDE SPOR MAHKEMELER\u0130, Asliye Ceza Mahkemeleri ile TFF\u2019nin ilgi alan\u0131na giren SPORT\u0130F KONULARA DA EL ATARAK m\u00fcvekkil Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu ve \u00e7ok say\u0131da spor adam\u0131n\u0131n tutuklanmas\u0131yla \u00fclkemiz sporunda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir kaosa yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ki; bunun bitmesi ihtimali \u00e7ok zordur.<\/p>\n

2- Bu uygulamayla TER\u00d6RLE M\u00dcCADELE \u0130\u00c7\u0130N kurulan mahkemeler D\u00dcNYADA E\u015e\u0130 BENZER\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dcLMEM\u0130\u015e B\u0130R \u015eEK\u0130LDE SPOR KANUNUNA MUHALEFET ETME \u0130DD\u0130ALARININDA YARGILAMA MERC\u0130\u0130 OLMU\u015eTUR.<\/p>\n

3- Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m; 10.07.2011 tarihinde \u0130stanbul 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2011\/71 Sorgu No\u2019lu karar\u0131 ile<\/p>\n

\u2018\u00d6rg\u00fct faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda birden fazla kez \u015fike eyleminde bulunmak ve bu eylemleri organize etmek\u2019 su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren olgular\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, mevcut delil durumu, bu y\u00f6nde at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u015f\u00fcpheli beyanlar\u0131, ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131, fiziki takip tutanaklar\u0131, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n kapsam\u0131na delillerin toplanmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, delilleri karartma ve etki etme tehlikesi dikkate al\u0131narak, ayr\u0131ca at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re CMK 100\/3 maddesi gere\u011fince tutuklama nedenleri var oldu\u011fu kabul edildi\u011finden CMK m 100 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince\u201d tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa m 141\/3\u2019te yer alan \u201cB\u00fct\u00fcn mahkemelerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli olarak yaz\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak matbu ifadelerle bug\u00fcne kadar Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n tutukluluk halinin gerek\u00e7eleri 19 ayd\u0131r aynen say\u0131lmaya devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n

4- \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 24.02.2012 tarihli tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin 61 nolu karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz da \u0130stanbul 17. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 16.03.2012 tarih ve 2012\/35 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f nolu karar\u0131 ile reddedilmi\u015ftir. Son olarak 4.5.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc yap\u0131lan duru\u015fmada da 10 ay\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n tutukluluk s\u00fcresine ve esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaa i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131na tevdi edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fini d\u00fczenleyen 19. Maddesi, Adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 38. Maddesi ile \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ayn\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeleri i\u00e7eren 5 ve 6. Maddelerine a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan matbu gerek\u00e7elerle Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma yoluna ba\u015fvurma zorunlulu\u011fu do\u011fmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

5- Say\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131m\u0131z ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere Ba\u015fbakan\u0131m\u0131z, Adalet Bakan\u0131m\u0131z, Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131 ve Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zel Yetkili mahkemelerin \u00f6zellikle tutuklama tedbiri ve yetki konular\u0131ndaki ele\u015ftirilerini i\u00e7eren ve dilek\u00e7emizde yer verdi\u011fimiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebimizin \u00fclkemiz aleyhine A\u0130HM\u2019e ba\u015fvurma yoluna gerek kalmadan ay\u0131n Adalet Bakan\u0131m\u0131z taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilece\u011fine ili\u015fkin umudumuzu korudu\u011fumuzu da ifade etme ihtiyac\u0131 hissediyoruz.<\/p>\n

II KANUN YARARINA BOZMA TALEB\u0130M\u0130Z HAKKINDAK\u0130 A\u00c7IKLAMALAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

1- Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Abdullah G\u00fcl 30.06.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada; “Uzun tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri fiili bir mahkumiyete d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmemeli. Bu t\u00fcr aksakl\u0131klar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi ve ge\u00e7 tecelli eden adaletin, adaletsizlikten farkl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile gerekli yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin en k\u0131sa zamanda hayata ge\u00e7irilmesi b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE’DE TUTUKLULARIN SAYISININ H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcLERDEN \u00c7OK OLDU\u011eUNU B\u0130Z KONU\u015eMALARIMIZDA DA S\u00d6YL\u00dcYORUZ. B\u00d6YLE B\u0130R \u015eEY T\u00dcRK\u0130YE’YE YAKI\u015eMAYAN B\u0130R \u015eEY. AYRICA TUTUKLULUK S\u00dcRELER\u0130N\u0130N UZAMASI, BUNLAR \u00c7OK B\u00dcY\u00dcK HAKSIZLIKLARA SEBEP OLAB\u0130L\u0130YOR. B\u00fct\u00fcn bunlar\u0131n giderilebilmesi i\u00e7in k\u00f6kl\u00fc bir \u015fekilde ve s\u00fcrekli bir \u015fekilde, herkesin el birli\u011fiyle yarg\u0131 reformuna katk\u0131 vermesi gerekiyor.”<\/p>\n

(Ek-1 Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Abdullah G\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn 30.06.2011 tarihli a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131)<\/p>\n

2- Ba\u015fbakan Say\u0131n Recep Tayyip ERDO\u011eAN, \u00f6nceki Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130lker BA\u015eBU\u011e\u2019un tutuklanmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak 9 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada;<\/p>\n

“\u015eu anda bir yasal s\u00fcre\u00e7 ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f vaziyette. Bu yasal s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde benim herhangi bir yoruma, de\u011ferlendirmeye girmem do\u011fru olmaz. Ama 2 y\u0131l Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak, Ba\u015fbakan olarak beraber \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z bir mesai arkada\u015f\u0131md\u0131r ve BURADA TUTUKLAMA YOLUYLA DE\u011e\u0130LDE, TUTUKSUZ YARGILANMA YOLU K\u0130; HER ZAMAN S\u00d6YLED\u0130\u011e\u0130M TEZ\u0130MD\u0130R, OLMASI B\u0130Z\u0130M HER ZAMANK\u0130 ARZUMUZDUR VE BUNUN DA S\u00dcRATLE BU NOKTADA NET\u0130CELENMES\u0130 Y\u0130NE \u015eAHSIMIN VE PART\u0130M\u0130N ARZUSUDUR. \u00c7\u00dcNK\u00dc BU \u015eEK\u0130LDEK\u0130 B\u0130R YOLU B\u0130Z \u0130SABETL\u0130 B\u0130R YOL OLARAK G\u00d6RM\u00dcYORUZ”<\/p>\n

(Ek-2 Ba\u015fbakan Say\u0131n Recep Tayyip ERDO\u011eAN, \u00f6nceki Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130lker BA\u015eBU\u011e\u2019un tutuklanmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak 9 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama)<\/p>\n

3- Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Ha\u015fim K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7\u2019\u0131n 02.04.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluslararas\u0131 Yarg\u0131 Sempozyumu\u2019nun a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma da;<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131y\u0131 bir c\u00fcmle ile tan\u0131mlamak gerekirse \u201cya\u015fanm\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7eklere ula\u015fma sanat\u0131\u201dd\u0131r da diyebiliriz. Bu ger\u00e7eklere ula\u015fmakla hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri ihlal edilmi\u015f olanlar\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 zaman\u0131nda ve adilce teslim etmi\u015f oluruz. \u0130\u015fte bug\u00fcn, bu sanat\u0131n icras\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan engellerin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in geli\u015fen teknikler konu\u015fulacak, b\u00f6ylece, yarg\u0131n\u0131n asli g\u00f6revi olan ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015f hak ihlallerini ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in \u201cvicdan birli\u011fini\u201d sa\u011flam\u0131\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131z. Yarg\u0131n\u0131n topluma sundu\u011fu yegane \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc adalettir. Ve bu \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn alternatifi de yoktur. Adalet hizmetlerinin onar\u0131c\u0131 niteli\u011fi, \u00fcretim kalitesi ve zaman\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile g\u00fc\u00e7 kazan\u0131r. Aksi durum bunal\u0131m, kaos ve vicdanlar\u0131 isyana s\u00fcr\u00fcklemekten ba\u015fka sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. \u0130\u015fte \u201chukukun haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d olarak da tan\u0131mlayaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z bu kaotik duruma \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulma zorunda oldu\u011fumuzu belirtmek isterim.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk yarg\u0131 d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda ya\u015fanan b\u00fcy\u00fck sorunlar\u0131n, uygulama s\u00fcrecinde ya\u015fanan olumsuzluklardan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek yanl\u0131\u015f olmayacakt\u0131r. Hakimin tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanamamas\u0131, mesleki e\u011fitimdeki eksiklikler, evrensel de\u011ferlere uzakl\u0131k gibi nedenler \u201cuygulamada\u201d toplumu ikna edecek g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc kararlar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131na imkan vermemektedir. Do\u011fan bu bo\u015fluk her seferinde siyaset kurumlar\u0131nca yasal d\u00fczenlemeler yap\u0131lmak suretiyle doldurulmu\u015f ve yarg\u0131n\u0131n yorum alan\u0131 daralt\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunu bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131ya olan g\u00fcvensizlik olarak da tan\u0131mlayabilirsiniz. YARGININ HESABINI VEREMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 SINIR TANIMAZ UYGULAMALARI A\u011eIR BEDELLER \u00d6DENMES\u0130 SONUCUNU DO\u011eURMU\u015e, ANAYASA VE YASALARDA RAD\u0130KAL DE\u011e\u0130\u015e\u0130MLER\u0130N YAPILMASININ HAKLI NEDEN\u0130N\u0130 OLU\u015eTURMU\u015eTUR. D\u00fcn yarg\u0131n\u0131n siyaseti ku\u015fatma gayretlerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z gibi bug\u00fcnde siyasetin yarg\u0131y\u0131 ku\u015fatmas\u0131na izin vermeyece\u011fiz.<\/p>\n

Hakimler, yasalar\u0131n ve kurallar\u0131n dilidir. Bu dili nas\u0131l kullan\u0131rsan\u0131z hukuk devleti ona g\u00f6re olu\u015fur ve geli\u015fir. Hakimin i\u00e7 d\u00fcnyas\u0131ndaki endi\u015fe, kayg\u0131, korku, idolojik bask\u0131, dostluk ve d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131k duygular\u0131ndan ar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n olmazsa olmaz ko\u015fuludur. Vicdanlar \u00fczerinde olu\u015fan bu i\u015fgaller kalkmad\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z bir yarg\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumunu sa\u011flamak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

(Ek-3 Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Ha\u015fim K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7\u2019\u0131n 02.04.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluslararas\u0131 Yarg\u0131 Sempozyumu\u2019nun a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma metni)<\/p>\n

4- Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah ERG\u0130N;<\/p>\n

a- 12 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc A\u0130HM Kararlar\u0131 I\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Koruma Tedbirleri Ve \u0130fade \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada;<\/p>\n

\u201cMevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin ve kurulan m\u00fcesseselerin uygulama sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 daha da \u00f6nemlidir. Bu s\u00fcrecin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinde ba\u015fta Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 ve hakimler olmak \u00fczere, uygulay\u0131c\u0131lara \u00f6nemli sorumluluk d\u00fc\u015fmektedir. Kamuoyunda bu mahkemelerin (\u00d6zel yetkili mahkemeler \u2013 CMK m 250 ile g\u00f6revli) g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar\u0131n soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan uygulamalar sebebiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan baz\u0131 olumsuz alg\u0131lar\u0131 da g\u00f6rmezden gelemeyiz.<\/p>\n

Ancak bu m\u00fccadele verilirken devletler, ki\u015filerin sahip olduklar\u0131 hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin zedelenmemesi, ihlal edilmemesi i\u00e7in gerekli dikkat ve \u00f6zeni azam\u00ee d\u00fczeyde g\u00f6stermek zorundad\u0131rlar. Bu su\u00e7lar\u0131n soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturulmas\u0131nda yasalarda d\u00fczenlenen temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri k\u0131s\u0131tlayan h\u00fck\u00fcmler; Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmak suretiyle \u00f6zenle ve dikkatle uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere; yap\u0131lacak i\u015flemlerde me\u015fru ama\u00e7, orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131k ve gereklilik kriterlerine uygun hareket edilmesidir.<\/p>\n

Avrupa \u0130nsan Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, devletlere i\u015flenen su\u00e7larla etkin bir soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00f6revi y\u00fcklenirken, bunun yan\u0131nda, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 \u00fcst ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda san\u0131klar\u0131n sahip olduklar\u0131 masumiyet karinesi, makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma ve silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi gibi haklar\u0131n da dikkatle korundu\u011fu ve bu haklar\u0131n ihlalinden devletlerin sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Ulusal g\u00fcvenlik kayg\u0131lar\u0131yla bireysel g\u00fcvenlik taleplerine s\u0131rt \u00e7eviren \u00fclkeler, sonu\u00e7ta ulusal g\u00fcvenliklerini sa\u011flayacak sosyal me\u015fruiyetten yoksun kalabilirler.<\/p>\n

Unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r ki, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere orant\u0131s\u0131z m\u00fcdahaleler, hukukun asla tasvip etmedi\u011fi bir husustur.<\/p>\n

Ceza muhakemesinin amac\u0131; her ne suretle olursa olsun, maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015fmak olmay\u0131p maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi, d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck ilkesi ve hukuk devletinin gereklerine uygun bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 sonucunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmakt\u0131r. Nitekim bu amac\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinde \u015f\u00fcphelinin haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve delil yasaklar\u0131na uyulmas\u0131 \u00f6nem arz etmektedir.<\/p>\n

\u2022 G\u00fcven veren adalet; BA\u015eTA TUTUKLAMA TEDB\u0130R\u0130 OLMAK \u00dcZERE temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda y\u00fcksek hassasiyetin g\u00f6sterilmesidir<\/p>\n

\u2022 G\u00fcven veren adalet; adaletin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ve alg\u0131lan\u0131r olmas\u0131n\u0131 da gerektirir.<\/p>\n

\u2022 G\u00fcven veren adalet, J\u00dcR\u0130STOKRAS\u0130YE DE\u011e\u0130L HUKUK DEVLET\u0130NE A\u00c7ILAN \u0130\u00c7T\u0130HATLARIN \u0130N\u015eA ED\u0130LMES\u0130D\u0130R.<\/p>\n

\u2022 G\u00fcven veren adalet; \u201c\u0130NSAN HAKLARI HUKUKUNUN\u201d ARTIK \u0130NSANLI\u011eIN \u201cKOZM\u0130K V\u0130CDANI\u201d HAL\u0130NE GELM\u0130\u015e OLDU\u011eUNU FARK ETMEKT\u0130R.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Ek-4-a : Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah Ergin\u2019in 12 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc A\u0130HM Kararlar\u0131 I\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Koruma Tedbirleri Ve \u0130fade \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

b- 23-24 \u015eubat 2012 tarihlerinde AB-T\u00dcRK\u0130YE 68. KARMA PARLAMENTO KOM\u0130SYONU TOPLANTISI yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada;<\/p>\n

\u201cT\u00fcrkiye\u2019de muhtemelen yo\u011fun i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc nedeni ile h\u00e2kimlerin tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stermemelerinden kaynaklanan ma\u011fduriyetleri \u00f6nlemek ad\u0131na Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununda ilave d\u00fczenlemeler getirilerek, tahliye talebinin reddi halinde bunun yeterli ve somut gerek\u00e7elerle a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu getirilmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca tutuklamaya alternatif olarak \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen adli kontrol uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 da Tasar\u0131 ile geni\u015fletilmekte ve b\u00f6ylece tutuklama kararlar\u0131n\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n azalt\u0131lmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 OLARAK, TUTUKLAMANIN EN SON TEDB\u0130R OLARAK VE ANCAK GEREKL\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dcLEN HALLERDE UYGULANMASINI ARZU ETMEKTEY\u0130Z.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Ek-4-b : Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah Ergin\u2019in23-24 \u015eubat 2012 tarihlerinde AB-T\u00dcRK\u0130YE 68. KARMA PARLAMENTO KOM\u0130SYONU TOPLANTISI yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

c- Adalet Bakan\u0131 Sadullah Ergin’in 18 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc “Yarg\u0131 Hizmetlerinin Daha Etkin, S\u00fcratli ve Verimli Bir \u015eekilde S\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi Amac\u0131yla Getirilen Yenilikler”in A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bas\u0131n Toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Konu\u015fma ve Sunumda;<\/p>\n

Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun (109\/1) mevcut d\u00fczenlemesinde,<\/p>\n

Adl\u00ee kontrol tedbiri, \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7lar hakk\u0131nda uygulanmaktad\u0131r. De\u011fi\u015fiklikle;<\/p>\n

\u00dcst s\u0131n\u0131r be\u015f y\u0131la \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmak suretiyle adl\u00ee konrol uygulanabilecek su\u00e7lar\u0131n kapsam\u0131 geni\u015fletilmektedir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak;<\/p>\n

\u2022 Tutuklamaya ger\u00e7ek anlamada alternatif olabilmesi,<\/p>\n

\u2022 TUTUKLAMADAN KAYNAKLANAN \u015e\u0130KAYETLER\u0130N G\u0130DER\u0130LMES\u0130,<\/p>\n

\u2022 Ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda kalan ki\u015fi say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n azalt\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n

\u2022 TUTUKLAMANIN GER\u00c7EKTEN SON \u00c7ARE OLARAK UYGULANMASI,<\/p>\n

\u2022 Adl\u00ee kontrol uygulamas\u0131nda takdir hakk\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi, Ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Tutuklama karar\u0131nda yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken hususlar 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun 101 inci maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. ANCAK, UYGULAMADA HAK\u0130MLER\u0130N tutuklama, tutuklu\u011fun devam\u0131 veya tahliye talebinin reddi kararlar\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stermeden MATBU \u015eEK\u0130LDE AYNI \u0130BARELER\u0130 KULLANARAK KARAR VERD\u0130KLER\u0130 Y\u00d6N\u00dcNDE ZAMAN ZAMAN \u015e\u0130KAYETLER YAPILMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

Bu durum hem T\u00fcrk kamuoyunda hem de uluslar aras\u0131 kurumlarda s\u00fcrekli ele\u015ftiri konusu yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu nedenlerle, tutuklamaya, tutuklaman\u0131n devam\u0131na veya bu husustaki bir tahliye isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin kararlarda, kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi ve tutuklama nedenlerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011funun somut olgularla gerek\u00e7elendirilerek a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi maddede yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Buna g\u00f6re, h\u00e2kim veya mahkeme, tutuklamaya, tutuklaman\u0131n devam\u0131na veya tahliye isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin karar verirken kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tutuklama nedenlerinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve somut olayda tutuklama tedbirinin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu somut olgularla gerek\u00e7elendirilecektir.<\/p>\n

CMK 250. MADDE KAPSAMINA G\u0130REN SU\u00c7LAR BAKIMINDAN \u00d6ZEL SORU\u015eTURMA VE KOVU\u015eTURMA USULLER\u0130NDEN BAZILARI KALDIRILMAKTADIR.<\/p>\n

Uzun zamand\u0131r kamuoyunda ve doktrinde ele\u015ftirilere u\u011frayan CMK\u2019n\u0131n 250. maddesi uyar\u0131nca g\u00f6revli olan \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerin g\u00f6revine giren su\u00e7larda uygulanan \u00f6zel soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma usullerinden baz\u0131lar\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. De\u011fi\u015fiklikle;<\/p>\n

Bu su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da esas itibar\u0131yla, \u00f6zellikle san\u0131k haklar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin geni\u015fletilmesi ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu ba\u011flamda;<\/p>\n

Belgelerden \u00f6rnek alma hakk\u0131na getirilen ve dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131ncaya kadar devam ettirilebilen s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 3 ayla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 tutulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

(Ek-4-c : Adalet Bakan\u0131 Sadullah Ergin’in 18 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc “Yarg\u0131 Hizmetlerinin Daha Etkin, S\u00fcratli ve Verimli Bir \u015eekilde S\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi Amac\u0131yla Getirilen Yenilikler”in A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bas\u0131n Toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Konu\u015fma ve Sunum)<\/p>\n

d- 12.09.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Uygulamalar\u0131ndan Do\u011fan Sorunlar ile Yarg\u0131n\u0131n H\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, Etkinlik ve Verimlili\u011fin Art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada;<\/p>\n

\u201cKi\u015filerin yakalanmas\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131, tutuklanmas\u0131, konut ve \u00fczerinin aranmas\u0131 gibi tedbirler ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hallerdir. Ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lama faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131, delillerin koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve ileride verilecek karar\u0131n infaz\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler sayesinde bir taraftan maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, di\u011fer taraftan da yarg\u0131lama faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere olabildi\u011fince az zarar verme ama\u00e7lanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

KORUMA TEDB\u0130RLER\u0130 GE\u00c7\u0130C\u0130 N\u0130TEL\u0130KTED\u0130R VE K\u0130\u015e\u0130 HAK VE \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dcKLER\u0130YLE \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 OLMASI SEBEB\u0130YLE, ORANTILI OLMAK ZORUNDADIR.<\/p>\n

En k\u00f6t\u00fc kanun uygulay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n elinde olumlu, en iyi kanun ise k\u00f6t\u00fc uygulay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n elinde olumsuz sonu\u00e7lar getirebilir. Uygulay\u0131c\u0131lar, g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde insan haklar\u0131 alan\u0131nda ula\u015f\u0131lan evrensel hukuk standartlar\u0131n\u0131n yakalanmas\u0131nda en \u00f6nemli fakt\u00f6rd\u00fcr. Su\u00e7 ve su\u00e7lularla m\u00fccadele edilirken, insanlar\u0131n temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin de m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funca korunmas\u0131 gerekir. Su\u00e7 ve su\u00e7lulukla m\u00fccadelede, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fi ve masumiyet karinesi gibi temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler feda edilmemelidir. Vatanda\u015flar\u0131n yarg\u0131ya g\u00fcven duyabilmesi i\u00e7in adil olmak yeterli de\u011fildir. Adil olman\u0131z\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi de gerekir\u201d<\/p>\n

(Ek-4-d: Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah Ergin\u2019in 12.09.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Uygulamalar\u0131ndan Do\u011fan Sorunlar ile Yarg\u0131n\u0131n H\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, Etkinlik ve Verimlili\u011fin Art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

5- Ba\u015fbakan Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve H\u00fck\u00fcmet s\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Say\u0131n B\u00fclent ARIN\u00c7, 26.10.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klamada;<\/p>\n

”Tahliye edilmi\u015f olmalar\u0131 kim olursa olsun, bizim i\u00e7in sevin\u00e7 do\u011furur. Bir insan\u0131n h\u00fcrriyetinin ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 hale gelmesi, tutukluluk ya da h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck ho\u015f de\u011fil. Bunlar\u0131 (Deniz feneri soru\u015fturmas\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelileri) TAHL\u0130YE EDEN HAK\u0130M\u0130N VERD\u0130\u011e\u0130 KARARIN, BA\u015eKA DAVALARDAK\u0130 HAK\u0130MLERE \u00d6RNEK OLMASINI D\u0130L\u0130YORUM. Kalben inan\u0131yorum ki yak\u0131n zamanda di\u011fer mahkemeler, heyetler veya hakimler, tahliye kararlar\u0131n\u0131 vermeye herhalde ba\u015flayacaklar. BA\u015eLAMALARI GEREK\u0130R, D\u0130YE S\u00d6YLEMEK \u0130ST\u0130YORUM. YOKSA BUNUN \u0130ZAHI OLMAZ. Buradaki da mahkeme hakimi, oradaki de mahkeme hakimi. Buradaki de tutuklu, oradaki de tutuklu. Sebahat Tuncel isimli bir bayan parlamentere tan\u0131nan bir imkan\u0131n bug\u00fcn milletvekili se\u00e7ilmi\u015f Mustafa Balbay, Haberal ve Engin Alan’a uygulanmamas\u0131n\u0131 benim vicdan\u0131m kabul etmiyor, do\u011fru bulmuyorum. Milletvekili se\u00e7ilen birinin yerinin Parlamento oldu\u011funu belirten Ar\u0131n\u00e7, ”Deniz Feneri san\u0131klar\u0131yla ilgili tahliye karar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn davalarda yarg\u0131lananlar i\u00e7in emsal te\u015fkil etti\u011fine inan\u0131yorum”<\/p>\n

(Ek-5 Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve H\u00fck\u00fcmet s\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Say\u0131n B\u00fclent Ar\u0131n\u00e7\u2019\u0131n 26 Ekim 2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama)<\/p>\n

6- Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Say\u0131n Ali BABACAN\u2019\u0131n 17 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluda\u011f Ekonomi Zirvesinin a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda uzun tutukluluk s\u00fcreleri ile ilgili yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada;<\/p>\n

“Y\u0131llarca kendileri hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn ne olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmeden hapislerde duruyorlar, insanlar\u0131n hayat\u0131 karar\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Ger\u00e7ek anlamda hukuk devleti olmayan bir T\u00fcrkiye’nin, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n en b\u00fcy\u00fck 10 ekonomisinden birisi olmas\u0131 da hayal. Yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrelerinin mutlaka k\u0131salmas\u0131 gerekiyor. Bak\u0131yoruz zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131. \u0130NSANLARIN HAYATI KARARIYOR. YA ADALET YER\u0130NE GELMED\u0130\u011e\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130N \u0130NSANLARIN HAYATI KARARIYOR YA DA \u0130NSANLARI TUTUKLAYIP \u0130\u00c7ER\u0130 ATIYORSUNUZ, YILLARCA KEND\u0130LER\u0130 HAKKINDAK\u0130 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN NE OLACA\u011eINI B\u0130LMEDEN HAP\u0130SLERDE DURUYOR \u0130NSANLAR.<\/p>\n

\u015eu anda bizim hapishanelerimizde 140 bin ki\u015fi var. Bunlar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc tutuklular. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc de\u011fil. Daha ne olaca\u011f\u0131 belli de\u011fil karar \u00e7\u0131kmam\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131nda. \u0130NSANLARIN HAYATI KARARIYOR A\u0130LE DRAMLARI YA\u015eANIYOR. YARGI KONUSUNDA A\u00c7IK F\u0130K\u0130RL\u0130 OLMAK ZORUNDAYIZ.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Ek-6 Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Say\u0131n Ali Babacan\u2019\u0131n 17 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluda\u011f Ekonomi Zirvesinin a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

7- Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m KAYNAK;<\/p>\n

a- 06.09.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc 2011-2012 adli y\u0131l a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f t\u00f6reninde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu konu\u015fmada;<\/p>\n

\u201cYarg\u0131 haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa u\u011fram\u0131\u015f insanlar\u0131n en \u00f6nemli s\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 6. maddesi davalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede hakkaniyete uygun olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fcr. 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu ilkenin ihlalinden dolay\u0131 \u00fclkemiz 25 milyon Euro tazminat \u00f6demek zorunda kald\u0131. En b\u00fcy\u00fck sorun davalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede bitirilmesi. H\u0131zl\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n temel g\u00f6revidir. \u0130leti\u015fim denetlemesi delil elde etmek i\u00e7in son \u00e7are olmal\u0131d\u0131r. EN A\u011eIR KARAR \u0130SE TUTUKLAMADIR. Tutuklama i\u00e7in ki\u015finin su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair \u00e7ok kuvvetli bir kanaat olmas\u0131 gerekir. Gerekmedi\u011fi halde koruma tedbirlerine (tutukluluk) ba\u015fvurmak ne kadar yanl\u0131\u015f ise gerekti\u011fi halde uygulamamak da yanl\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Ek-7-a : Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m Kaynak\u2019\u0131n 2011-2012 Adli Y\u0131l a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f t\u00f6reninde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

b- Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m KAYNAK\u2019\u0131n 22 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130zmir\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen 2. Ulusal Hukuk Kongresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada;<\/p>\n

Tedbirler uygulan\u0131rken korunan de\u011ferler ile ihlal edilen hakk\u0131n de\u011feri iyi korunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bunu yapacak olan da hakimlerdir. Tedbirlerin bir di\u011fer \u00f6zelli\u011fi ge\u00e7ici olu\u015fudur. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ortada kesin bir karar bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Belirli s\u00fcreyle denildi\u011finde bu s\u00fcre \u00f6nem arz etmektedir. K\u0131s\u0131tlama s\u00fcresinin tayininde \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc davranmak gerekmektedir. Ge\u00e7ici hukuki korumalar uygulamas\u0131 son derece dikkat gerektiren, m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funda uygulanmamas\u0131 gereken veya daha az hak ihlaline neden olacak son denece hassas bir konudur. Karar\u0131n farkl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek dikkatli olmak gerekmektedir. B\u0130R \u0130NSANIN HAKSIZ YERE \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcN\u00dcN KISITLANMASINI H\u0130\u00c7B\u0130R BEDEL TAM OLARAK KAR\u015eILAYAMAZ. Ki\u015finin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile g\u00fcvenli\u011fini dengelemeyi yerine getirenlerin hakkaniyetle \u00e7ok iyi dengelemesi gerekir. Koruma tedbirleri adaletin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in adaleti sa\u011flayanlara verilmi\u015f bir yetkidir. Bu yetkinin k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmamas\u0131na g\u00f6sterilen \u00f6zen zay\u0131flat\u0131lmamas\u0131na da g\u00f6sterilmelidir dedi. Kaynak, ayr\u0131ca, koruma kararlar\u0131n\u0131n A\u0130HM’de kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan \u00f6nemli bir sorun da oldu\u011funu dile getirdi.<\/p>\n

(Ek-7-b : Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m KAYNAK\u2019\u0131n 22 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130zmir\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen 2. Ulusal Hukuk Kongresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma)<\/p>\n

8- Fenerbah\u00e7e Spor Kul\u00fcb\u00fc Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Aziz YILDIRIM\u2019\u0131n tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 dosyada 23 Kas\u0131m 2010 tarihinden itibaren devletin b\u00fct\u00fcn imkanlar\u0131 kullan\u0131larak soru\u015fturma yap\u0131larak deliller toplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcm san\u0131klar\u0131n ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda t\u00fcm tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olup dava dosyas\u0131nda mevcuttur. Soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda g\u00fcya silahl\u0131 \u00e7ete \u00fcyesi olmakla su\u00e7lanan san\u0131klar\u0131n biri hari\u00e7 tamam\u0131 bug\u00fcn itibariyle tahliye edilmi\u015ftir. Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019a isnat edilen su\u00e7un kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezas\u0131 1-3 y\u0131l aras\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ve tutuklu olarak ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi 309 g\u00fcn g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131, Ba\u015fbakan, Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131, Adalet Bakan\u0131, Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da \u00f6zetlenen a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere mevcut tutukluluk hali \u0130NFAZA d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

9- TBMM taraf\u0131ndan 5.4.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc kabul edilen ve 11.04.2012 tarih ve 28621 say\u0131l\u0131 resmi gazetede yay\u0131nlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6291 say\u0131l\u0131 denetimli serbestlik kanunu gere\u011fince;<\/p>\n

a- ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme s\u00fcresine, 1 y\u0131l kalan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler,<\/p>\n

b- S\u0131f\u0131r-alt\u0131 ya\u015f grubunda \u00e7ocu\u011fu bulunan ve ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmesine iki y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcre kalan kad\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler,<\/p>\n

c- Maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r bir hastal\u0131k, sakatl\u0131k veya kocama nedeniyle hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 yaln\u0131z idame ettiremeyen ve ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmesine \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l veya daha az s\u00fcre kalan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler, infaz hakimli\u011fi karar\u0131 ile denetimli olarak serbest kalma imkan\u0131na sahip olmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

10- Ayn\u0131 hukuk d\u00fczenine tabi iki vatanda\u015ftan birinin H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dc OLMASINA RA\u011eMEN \u00f6zg\u00fcr olabildi\u011fi, buna kar\u015f\u0131n TEDB\u0130REN \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc KISITLANAN TUTUKLU D\u0130\u011eER B\u0130R VATANDA\u015eIN \u0130SE CEZAEV\u0130NDE TUTULARAK \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNDEN YOKSUN BIRAKILMASI hi\u00e7bir mant\u0131k, vicdan ve hukuk ilkesi ile a\u00e7\u0131klanamaz. Mevcut yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ve mahkemelerin ceza tayinindeki uygulama dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, m\u00fcvekkil Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m hakk\u0131nda sevk maddeleri do\u011frultusunda hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc olsayd\u0131 6291 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa gere\u011fince \u00d6ZG\u00dcRL\u00dc\u011e\u00dcNE KAVU\u015eMASI ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazd\u0131.<\/p>\n

Hukuki Nedenler : Anayasa m. 2, 19 ve 38, \u0130NSAN HAKLARI AVRUPA S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMES\u0130 m 5, 6 ve 13; CMK m. 268, 309ncu maddeler; 6291 say\u0131l\u0131 DENET\u0130ML\u0130 SERBESTL\u0130K YASASI, Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131, A\u0130HM i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131, sair ilgili mevzuat.<\/p>\n

Deliller:<\/p>\n

1) 10.07. 2011 \u0130stanbul 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh, 2011\/71 sorgu<\/p>\n

2) 22.07.2011 \u0130stanbul 14 A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh. 2011\/902 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

3) 12.08.2011 \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/521 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

4) 09.09.2011 \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/593 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

5) 10.09.2011 \u0130stanbul 17. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/30 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

6) 27.09.2011 \u0130stanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1081 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

7) 06.10.2011 \u0130stanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1131 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

8) 06.10.2011 \u0130stanbul 12. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1132 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

9) 11.10.2011 \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/673 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

10) 03.11.2011 \u0130stanbul 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1182 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

11) 11.11. 2011 \u0130stanbul 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/768 D \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

12) 14.11.2011 \u0130stanbul 14. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1211 D \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

13) 29.11.2011 \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/1204 D \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

14) 12.12.2011 \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/63 Esas<\/p>\n

15) 06.01.2012 \u0130stanbul 17. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2012\/3 D. \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

16) 09.01.2012 \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/63 Esas<\/p>\n

17) 24.02.2011 \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/63 Esas<\/p>\n

18) 16.03.2012 \u0130stanbul 17. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2012\/35 D \u0130\u015f<\/p>\n

19) 30.03.2012 \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/63 Esas<\/p>\n

20) 04.05.2012 \u0130stanbul 16. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mh 2011\/63 Esas ve di\u011fer RED KARARLARI ile<\/p>\n

21) 234 ADET D\u0130NLEME KARARI<\/p>\n

22) 140 adet gizli izleme, takip karar\u0131<\/p>\n

23) Yakalama kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n

24) G\u00f6zalt\u0131 kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n

25) El koyma kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n

26) TAHL\u0130YE TALEPLER\u0130N\u0130 RED KARARLARININ, YARGI SAFAHATINA RA\u011eMEN H\u0130\u00c7 DE\u011e\u0130\u015eMEYEN \u0130\u00c7ER\u0130KLER\u0130<\/p>\n

27) B\u00fct\u00fcn dosya i\u00e7eri\u011findeki bilgi ve belgeler ile \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurmak zorunda b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131rsak konacak sair deliller<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 VE TALEP:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

B\u00fct\u00fcn dilek\u00e7emiz kapsam\u0131nda arz ve izaha \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z, say\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fbakan\u0131m\u0131z dahil b\u00fct\u00fcn devlet erkan\u0131n\u0131n, ana muhalefet partisi ba\u015fta b\u00fct\u00fcn siyasi partilerin, \u00f6zellikle Adalet Bakan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n ve y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131 dahil b\u00fct\u00fcn yarg\u0131 temsilcilerinin, barolar\u0131n ve \u00fcniversitelerin, akademisyenlerin, yazarlar\u0131n, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrlerin, her g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ften gazetecilerin, yurtta\u015flar\u0131n s\u00f6z ve talepleri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; bu \u00fclkede ger\u00e7ekten kat\u0131\u015f\u0131ks\u0131z imrenilecek bir hukuk sistemini mevcut kurallar\u0131 dahi iyi yorumlayarak sa\u011flamas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn iken: YEN\u0130 ANAYASA YAPMA GAYRETLER\u0130 DAH\u0130L OLMAK \u00dcZERE UYGAR B\u0130R \u00dcLKEDE \u0130LER\u0130 HUKUK UYGULAMALARI \u0130LE SOSYAL BARI\u015e SA\u011eLANMI\u015e VE KORKULARDAN TED\u0130RG\u0130NL\u0130KLERDEN SIYRILMI\u015e, \u00d6ZEL HAYATLARIN MARAZ\u0130 D\u0130NLEME VE ZORAK\u0130 SU\u00c7 OLU\u015eTURMA TAARRUZU OLMAYACAK \u015eEK\u0130LDE YA\u015eAMA isteklerinde samimi olundu\u011funu, yoksa uyum yasalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6stermelik olarak laz\u0131m olan ufak tefek makyajlar yaparak \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar yuma\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7inde k\u0131sa \u00f6m\u00fcrlerimizi t\u00fcketmek zorunda m\u0131 oldu\u011fumuzu g\u00f6sterebilmek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n

Aziz YILDIRIM (ve dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki san\u0131klar) hakk\u0131nda, tutuklama ve tutuklaman\u0131n devam\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren \u015fartlar mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, HUKUKA AYKIRILI\u011eININ G\u0130DER\u0130LEB\u0130LMES\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130N KANUN YARARINA BOZMADAN BA\u015eKA \u0130MKAN KALMADI\u011eININ a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya kondu\u011fu yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131m\u0131z \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fimiz (deliller b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde say\u0131lan) bir b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck arz eden kararlar \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 MAHKEMELER\u0130N HER ALANA TA\u015eAN GEN\u0130\u015eLEM\u0130\u015e ALANLARINDA, KEND\u0130 KARARLARININ \u0130T\u0130RAZ \u0130NCELEMELER\u0130NE KATILARAK KALDIRILMI\u015e DGM UYGULAMALARININ G\u00d6REV\u0130\/YETK\u0130Y\u0130 K\u00d6T\u00dcYE KULLANARAK S\u00dcRD\u00dcR\u00dcLMES\u0130 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda;<\/p>\n

Bu uygulama ve kararlar Yarg\u0131tay incelemesinden ge\u00e7meden kesinle\u015fti\u011finden, 93 san\u0131ktan 83\u2019\u00fcn\u00fcn tutuksuz yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131, bahsi ge\u00e7en silahlar\u0131n hi\u00e7birisinin Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m veya Fenerbah\u00e7elilere ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (kime ait olursa olsun hi\u00e7bir su\u00e7ta dahi kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, temiz oldu\u011fu mahkeme a\u015famas\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan);<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca zoraki irtibatland\u0131r\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan S\u0130LAHLI SU\u00c7 \u00d6RG\u00dcT\u00dc OLMAKLA \u0130THAM ED\u0130LEN SANIKLARDAN \u00d6ZELL\u0130KLE TUTULAN B\u0130R\u0130 HAR\u0130\u00c7 TAMAMININ TAHL\u0130YE ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 ve 6291 SAYILI KANUNLA H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcLER\u0130N B\u0130LE SERBEST BIRAKILMAYA BA\u015eLANDI\u011eI \u015eARTLAR ALTINDA, \u00d6N\u00d6DEMEL\u0130 yada PE\u015e\u0130N \u0130NFAZ KAB\u0130L\u0130NDEN (alt s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 1 y\u0131l olan cezadan dolay\u0131 11 ayd\u0131r tutuklu yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131); YARGILAMA SONUCU MUTLAKA CEZA VER\u0130LECE\u011e\u0130N\u0130N A\u00c7IK G\u00d6STERGES\u0130 oldu\u011fundan; bu durumda yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurulursa veya Avrupa Birli\u011fi izleme raporlar\u0131na konu olursa kabilinden bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 oldu\u011fu yorumlar\u0131na yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131;<\/p>\n

Gizli mobil tan\u0131k, KOZM\u0130K DOSYA; TORBA SU\u00c7LAMA; etkisizle\u015ftirilmi\u015f savunma; alakas\u0131z su\u00e7lamalarla \u00e7ok say\u0131da insan\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla bir araya toplanarak alt\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lamaz \u015fi\u015firilmi\u015f dosyalarla, \u00c7ETE SU\u00c7UNDAN TUTUKLU SANIK HAL\u0130NE GET\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 DURUMUNDA 24 AYLIK MAA\u015eA KADAR PARA VE PUAN \u00d6D\u00dcL\u00dcN\u00dcN AVCIYA D\u00d6N\u00dc\u015eT\u00dcRD\u00dc\u011e\u00dc KOLLU\u011eUN AV KONUMUNDAK\u0130 SANIKLAR; kolluktaki TE\u015eV\u0130K PR\u0130M\u0130 VE \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L MAHKEMELER\u0130N ANA HABERLERE KONU TUTUKLAMA DALGALARIYLA aklanma s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin imkans\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak:<\/p>\n

5 Nisan 2012’de kabul edilip 11 Nisan 2012’de y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6291 say\u0131l\u0131 Denetimli Serbestlik Yasas\u0131 uyar\u0131nca CEZASI KES\u0130NLE\u015eM\u0130\u015e VE \u0130NFAZINA BA\u015eLANMI\u015e OLSA B\u0130LE \u0130NFAZIN TAMAMLANMASINA B\u0130R YILI KALAN H\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcLER\u0130N tahliyesi imkan\u0131 zikredilen TAHL\u0130YEN\u0130N B\u00dcT\u00dcN S\u00dcRECE KATILMI\u015e \u00d6ZEL YETK\u0130L\u0130 HAK\u0130MLERCE REDDED\u0130LMES\u0130NE dair b\u00fct\u00fcn kararlar\u0131n KANUN YARARINA BOZULMASI i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131; s\u00f6ylenen HUKUK REFORMLARINA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N BUNCA G\u00dcZEL S\u00d6ZLER\u0130N sahibi say\u0131n bakan\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n tutumunu isbat bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da gerekli oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda;<\/p>\n

HUKUKA AYKIRI DEL\u0130LLER\u0130N (soru\u015fturman\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn a\u015famalar\u0131nda kimlerin ne yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yazmaya gerek olmaks\u0131z\u0131n) KARARTILMASI ve delil durumu gibi gerek\u00e7elerle tutukluluk hallerini reddeden \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemelerin durumlar\u0131 gerekli yasal d\u00fczenlemelerin ve kararlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da KANUN LEH\u0130NE BOZMA BA\u015eVURULMASI mekanizmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in;<\/p>\n

Gere\u011fini sayg\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131zla arz ve talep ederiz. “<\/p>\n

Av. Faik I\u015f\u0131k Av. Abdurrahim Erol<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

EKLER :<\/strong><\/p>\n

1- Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Abdullah G\u00fcl\u2019\u00fcn 30 Haziran 2011 tarihli a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131<\/p>\n

2- Ba\u015fbakan Say\u0131n Recep Tayyip ERDO\u011eAN, \u00f6nceki Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130lker BA\u015eBU\u011e\u2019un tutuklanmas\u0131 ile ilgili olarak 9 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama<\/p>\n

3- Anayasa Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Ha\u015fim K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7\u2019\u0131n 02.04.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluslararas\u0131 Yarg\u0131 Sempozyumu\u2019nun a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

4- a- Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah Ergin\u2019in 12 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc A\u0130HM Kararlar\u0131 I\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Koruma Tedbirleri Ve \u0130fade \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

b-Adalet Bakan\u0131 Say\u0131n Sadullah Ergin\u2019in 23-24 \u015eubat 2012 tarihlerinde AB-T\u00dcRK\u0130YE 68. KARMA PARLAMENTO KOM\u0130SYONU TOPLANTISI yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

c- Adalet Bakan\u0131 Sadullah Ergin’in 18 Ocak 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc “Yarg\u0131 Hizmetlerinin Daha Etkin, S\u00fcratli ve Verimli Bir \u015eekilde S\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi Amac\u0131yla Getirilen Yenilikler”in A\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bas\u0131n Toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Konu\u015fma ve Sunum<\/p>\n

d- Adalet Bakan\u0131 Sadullah Ergin’in 12 Ekim 2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Uygulamalar\u0131ndan Do\u011fan Sorunlar ile Yarg\u0131n\u0131n H\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, Etkinlik ve Verimlili\u011fin Art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Sempozyumunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

5- Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 ve H\u00fck\u00fcmet s\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Say\u0131n B\u00fclent Ar\u0131n\u00e7\u2019\u0131n 26 Ekim 2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama<\/p>\n

6- Ba\u015fbakan yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Say\u0131n Ali Babacan\u2019\u0131n 17 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc Uluda\u011f Ekonomi Zirvesinin a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

7- a-Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m Kaynak\u2019\u0131n 2011-2012 Adli Y\u0131l\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki A\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131<\/p>\n

b-Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Say\u0131n Naz\u0131m KAYNAK\u2019\u0131n 22 Mart 2012 g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130zmir\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen 2. Ulusal Hukuk Kongresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fma<\/p>\n

Kaynak : GAZETEPORT<\/a><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

\u0130\u015fte avukatlar I\u015f\u0131k ile Erol’un, Fenerbah\u00e7e Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Aziz Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m hakk\u0131nda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na verilen dilek\u00e7enin tam metni.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti ADALET BAKANLI\u011eI<\/p>\n

Kanun Yarar\u0131na Bozma Talebinde Bulunan : Aziz YILDIRIM<\/p>\n

M\u00fcdafiileri : Av. Faik I\u015eIK \u2013 Av. Abdurrahim Erol<\/p>\n

Bozulmas\u0131 Talep Edilen Mahkeme Karar\u0131: <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[1020],"class_list":["post-51275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","tag-aziz-yildirim","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=51275"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51275\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=51275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=51275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=51275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}