{"id":4679,"date":"2009-03-04T16:09:18","date_gmt":"2009-03-04T14:09:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=4679"},"modified":"2009-03-04T16:09:18","modified_gmt":"2009-03-04T14:09:18","slug":"akmana-sorusturma-izni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=4679","title":{"rendered":"Akman’a soru\u015fturma izni"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Radyo<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay, Ba\u015fbakan’\u0131n ‘soru\u015fturma izni’ vermemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay 1. Dairesi, Radyo ve Televizyon \u00dcst Kurulu (RT\u00dcK) Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Zahid Akman ile 7 \u00fcye, 5 b\u00fcrokrat hakk\u0131nda, yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 uygulamad\u0131klar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Ba\u015fbakan Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan’\u0131n ‘soru\u015fturma izni vermemesi’ne ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. Daire, bu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131ndaki dosyay\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n

G\u00f6revden al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6reve iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7an Eski RT\u00dcK Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Cengiz \u00d6zdiker, a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalardaki ‘yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131’ gerek\u00e7esiyle Ba\u015fkan Akman, Ba\u015fkanvekili Vahap Darendeli, \u00fcyeler Davut Dursun, \u0130lhan Yerlikaya, Taha Y\u00fccel, Pa\u015fa Ya\u015far, Arif Merdol ve Mehmet Dadak ile b\u00fcrokratlar \u015eeref Atakl\u0131, \u00d6zger Sezen, Mehmet Nuri Erikel, L\u00fctfettin Mesutgil, Ahmet Batun hakk\u0131nda \u015fikayette bulundu.
\n\u015eikayet \u00fczerine Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, bu ki\u015filerin T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu maddelerine g\u00f6re yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131na karar verdi. Ancak 10 Temmuz 2008’de y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5785 say\u0131l\u0131 Radyo ve Televizyonlar\u0131n Kurulu\u015f ve Yay\u0131nlar\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun ile eski kanuna, ‘\u00dcst Kurul \u00fcyelerinin g\u00f6revleriyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak i\u015fledikleri iddia edilen su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin soru\u015fturmalar 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Memurlar ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerinin Yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanuna g\u00f6re yap\u0131l\u0131r ve bunlar hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma izni, Ba\u015fbakan taraf\u0131ndan verilir’ h\u00fckm\u00fc eklendi. Bu nedenle h\u00fck\u00fcm a\u015famas\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131laman\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na karar verilerek dosya \u00f6nce Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na, buradan da Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k’a g\u00f6nderildi.\n<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fbakan Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan ise bu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma izni vermedi.<\/p>\n

Bu karara itiraz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Dan\u0131\u015ftay 1. Dairesi, Ba\u015fbakan Erdo\u011fan’\u0131n, 10 Kas\u0131m 2008 tarihli ‘soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesi’ne ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dairenin karar\u0131nda, idari yarg\u0131 yerlerince verilen y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 ve iptali istenen i\u015flemin tesisinden \u00f6nceki hukuki durumun aynen ihya edilmesi gerekti\u011fi yolundaki idare hukuku ilkesi gere\u011fince, yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na uygun i\u015flem tesis edilmesi gerekti\u011fi vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kararda, ‘\u015fikayet\u00e7inin Diyarbak\u0131r B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcr Yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na atanmas\u0131 ile yetinildi\u011fi, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc dava sonucunda verilen y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 karar\u0131ndan sonra E\u011fitim Dairesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na atand\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130dari yarg\u0131 yerlerince verilen y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Ancak a\u00e7\u0131lan d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc davada verilen y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip, gecikmeli olarak karar\u0131n uygulanabildi\u011fi ifade edilen kararda, ‘Bu nedenle ilgililere isnat edilen eylemin, haklar\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, itirazlar\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle, Ba\u015fbakan’\u0131n 10 Kas\u0131m 2008 g\u00fcnl\u00fc soru\u015fturma izni verilmemesine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, dosyan\u0131n Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesine oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi’ denildi.<\/p>\n

Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma sonucunda dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi gibi, takipsizlik karar\u0131 da verebilecek.<\/p>\n

AA<\/span><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay, Ba\u015fbakan’\u0131n ‘soru\u015fturma izni’ vermemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay 1. Dairesi, Radyo ve Televizyon \u00dcst Kurulu (RT\u00dcK) Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Zahid Akman ile 7 \u00fcye, 5 b\u00fcrokrat hakk\u0131nda, yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 uygulamad\u0131klar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle Ba\u015fbakan Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan’\u0131n ‘soru\u015fturma izni vermemesi’ne ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. Daire, bu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131ndaki dosyay\u0131 Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n