{"id":45376,"date":"2011-12-27T09:44:43","date_gmt":"2011-12-27T07:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=45376"},"modified":"2011-12-27T17:02:54","modified_gmt":"2011-12-27T15:02:54","slug":"behcet-oktayin-olumunde-yeni-suphe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=45376","title":{"rendered":"Beh\u00e7et Oktay’\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yeni \u015f\u00fcphe"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Beh\u00e7et Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili ilgin\u00e7 bir geli\u015fme ya\u015fand\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ankara\u2019daki faili me\u00e7hul cinayetlerle ilgili soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda tutuklanan eski \u00f6zel harek\u00e2t\u00e7\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ark\u0131n\u2019\u0131n \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Beh\u00e7et Oktay\u2019\u0131n eceliyle \u00f6lmedi\u011fini iddia etmesi, Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili \u015f\u00fcphelerin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131 yeniden g\u00fcndeme ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Oktay ailesinin avukat\u0131 \u015eenol \u00d6zel, Oktay\u2019a ait cep telefonu d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerini inceledikten sonra 5 Eyl\u00fcl 2011\u2019de savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa dilek\u00e7e vermi\u015fti.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Milliyet’in haberine g\u00f6re, kay\u0131tlardan, Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6lmeden \u00f6nce son kez g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc numara ile \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden 8 saat sonra 11 saniyelik bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015f, ayr\u0131ca Ankara Emniyeti\u2019nde olmas\u0131 gereken telefonun, emniyet d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 saat kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlenmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Oktay\u2019a ait di\u011fer telefonun sinyalinin ise emniyetten geldi\u011fi, ancak bu telefona da yine \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra bir mesaj geldi\u011fi ve bu mesaja da yan\u0131t verildi\u011fi saptanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Oktay\u2019\u0131n telefonlar\u0131na ait bu \u015f\u00fcpheler giderilemezken, olay\u0131n tek g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan Halil Kesici\u2019nin Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelere ili\u015fkin de yeni \u00e7eli\u015fkiler ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Al\u0131nan bilgiye g\u00f6re Kesici, 25 \u015eubat 2009\u2019da Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra \u00fc\u00e7 kere, saat 02.00.46\u2019da 47 saniye, 02.03.14\u2019de 22 saniye, 02.14.17\u2019de de 33 saniye olmak \u00fczere 155 Polis \u0130mdat\u2019\u0131 arad\u0131. Ancak Kesici\u2019ye ait telefon d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerindeki 155 s\u00fcreleri ile dosyadaki 155 ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131 CD\u2019sindeki s\u00fcreler \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi.<\/p>\n

D\u00dcZELTME YADA EKLEME\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

155 ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131 CD\u2019sine g\u00f6re Kesici\u2019nin 1207945 Raw\u2019da (ses dosyas\u0131) 59 saniye, 1207971 Raw\u2019da 26 saniye, 1208067 Raw\u2019da da 37 saniye olmak \u00fczere 155\u2019i arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Avukat \u00d6zel, savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7esinde \u015f\u00f6yle dedi:<\/p>\n

\u201cHalil Kesici\u2019nin telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u00fcreleri ile dosya ekindeki 155 kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda yer alan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u00fcreleri birbirini tutmamaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca 155 kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda tarih, saat ve arayan numara yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in 25 \u015eubat 2009 tarihinde ve hangi saatlerde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile arayan numaran\u0131n Halil Kesici\u2019nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 telefona ait olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mu\u011flak kalmaktad\u0131r. Bu kay\u0131tlarda bir d\u00fczeltme ya da ekleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f izlenimi do\u011fmaktad\u0131r. 155 ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki arama s\u00fcreleri ile Halil Kesici\u2019nin telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda yer alan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u00fcreleri aras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesi zarurettir.\u201d<\/p>\n

S\u0130LAH SES\u0130 DUYDUN TAMAM MI?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili \u015f\u00fcphelerin telefon d\u00f6k\u00fcmleriyle de s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u00d6zel, olay yeri inceleme kasedinin, 3.16.46 saniyesinde ba\u015flayan bir konu\u015fmada, \u201cSilah sesi duydun tamam m\u0131?\u201d denilerek, nas\u0131l ifade verece\u011finin tembih edildi\u011fi iddia edildi. \u00d6zel, bu konu\u015fman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada Kesici\u2019nin olay yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zel, tembihleyen ki\u015finin kim oldu\u011funun, olay yerinde bulunan Neriman F\u0131\u00e7\u0131c\u0131 ve Ali R\u0131za \u00d6z\u00e7elik\u2019ten sorulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kaydetti. \u00d6zel, kasetin 4.11.33 ve 4.11.43 saniyelerinde ara\u00e7 \u00fcst\u00fcndeki doku par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ancak daha \u00f6nceki a\u00e7\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinde ve daha \u00f6nceki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerde doku par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

Avukat \u00d6zel \u015f\u00f6yle devam etti: \u201cYine ayn\u0131 kasedin 4.30.27 saniyesinde duyulan bir ses de, \u2018Doku par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131 sol tarafa m\u0131 koydunuz?\u2019 demektedir ki, bu durum \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir. \u015e\u00fchheli bir durum arzeden bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler delil karartmas\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmelidir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc o dokunun oraya polis taraf\u0131ndan konuldu\u011fu intiba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vermektedir.\u201d<\/p>\n

DOKU PAR\u00c7ASINI SOL TARAFA MI KOYDUNUZ\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Beh\u00e7et Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili soru\u015fturmada, tek g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kesici\u2019nin 155 Polis \u0130mdat\u2019\u0131 arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrelerle, 155 ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme s\u00fcrelerinin birbirini tutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edildi. Bir iddia da, olay yeri inceleme kasedinde \u201cDoku par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131 sol tarafa m\u0131 koydunuz?\u201d diye soran birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131…<\/p>\n

DOSYA YEN\u0130DEN A\u00c7ILMI\u015eTI\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Oktay, 25 \u015eubat 2009\u2019da saat 02.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Dikmen Keklikp\u0131nar\u0131 Mahallesi 50. cadde 29 numaral\u0131 evinin \u00f6n\u00fcnde yaral\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftu. Hastaneye kald\u0131r\u0131lan Oktay, t\u00fcm m\u00fcdahalelere ra\u011fmen kurtar\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Olay\u0131 soru\u015fturan Ankara Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, 20 Nisan 2009\u2019da Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u201cintihar\u201d etti\u011fi tespitiyle takipsizlik karar\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Oktay\u2019\u0131n ailesi, adli t\u0131p, otopsi raporlar\u0131ndaki tespitler ve \u015f\u00fcpheli tan\u0131k ifadeleri uyar\u0131nca karara itiraz etmi\u015fti. Sincan 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin takipsizlik karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dosya yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kaynak : VATAN Gazetesi<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

\u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Beh\u00e7et Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili ilgin\u00e7 bir geli\u015fme ya\u015fand\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ankara\u2019daki faili me\u00e7hul cinayetlerle ilgili soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda tutuklanan eski \u00f6zel harek\u00e2t\u00e7\u0131 Ayhan \u00c7ark\u0131n\u2019\u0131n \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Beh\u00e7et Oktay\u2019\u0131n eceliyle \u00f6lmedi\u011fini iddia etmesi, Oktay\u2019\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle ilgili \u015f\u00fcphelerin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131 yeniden g\u00fcndeme ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Oktay ailesinin avukat\u0131 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[600],"class_list":["post-45376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","tag-behcet-oktay","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}