{"id":41695,"date":"2011-10-28T13:05:56","date_gmt":"2011-10-28T10:05:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=41695"},"modified":"2011-10-28T23:24:12","modified_gmt":"2011-10-28T20:24:12","slug":"hakkin-var-da-paran-var-mi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=41695","title":{"rendered":"Hakk\u0131n var da paran var m\u0131?!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Dava a\u00e7ma \u00fccretleri 20 – 30 kat\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131!<\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u00fcketici \u00d6rg\u00fctleri Federasyonu (T\u00d6F), Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Gider Avans\u0131 Tarifesi Hakk\u0131nda Tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 ve iptaline karar verilmesi i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay’da dava a\u00e7t\u0131.\u00a0<\/p>\n

T\u00d6F ad\u0131na Fuat Engin taraf\u0131ndan \u0130stanbul N\u00f6bet\u00e7i \u0130dare Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 eliyle Dan\u0131\u015ftay ilgili hukuk dairesi ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere verilen dilek\u00e7ede, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Gider Avans\u0131 Tarifesi Hakk\u0131nda Tebli\u011f<\/a> h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, 30 Eyl\u00fcl 2011 tarih ve 28070 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak 1 Ekim 2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, tebli\u011f ile a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda mahkeme veznesine yat\u0131r\u0131lacak olan gider avans\u0131 miktar\u0131 ile avans\u0131n \u00f6denmesine ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlenen usul ve esaslar\u0131n, \u00f6zellikle 4. maddede belirtilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, t\u00fcketicilere \u00f6nemli y\u00fckler getirdi\u011fi ve hak aramay\u0131 cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 hale getirerek ”neredeyse olanaks\u0131z” k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedilerek, ”T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanunla d\u00fczenlenen ve hak aramay\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131ran h\u00fck\u00fcmleri i\u015flevsiz k\u0131lan tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini, ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda t\u00fcketicileri hak arama imkan\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakmakta ve t\u00fcketiciler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan telafisi g\u00fc\u00e7 sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131na neden olmaktad\u0131r. Tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yasa ve hukuk h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal etmi\u015f, kamu yarar\u0131 yok say\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gere\u011fi do\u011fmu\u015ftur” denildi.<\/p>\n

Tebli\u011fin, Anayasa’n\u0131n 5. maddesi ile d\u00fczenlenen ”Devletin Temel Ama\u00e7 ve G\u00f6revleri” ilkesine, Anayasa’n\u0131n 172. maddesinde belirtilen ”Devlet, t\u00fcketicileri koruyucu ve ayd\u0131nlat\u0131c\u0131 tedbirler al\u0131r, t\u00fcketicilerin kendilerini koruyucu giri\u015fimlerini te\u015fvik eder” h\u00fckm\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturdu\u011fu savunuldu.<\/p>\n

4822 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla de\u011fi\u015fik 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun (TKHK) 23. maddesi ile t\u00fcketici uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131nda basit usulde yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ilkesi temel al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, t\u00fcketici mahkemeleri nezdinde t\u00fcketicilerin, t\u00fcketici \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ve bakanl\u0131k\u00e7a a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalar\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc resim ve har\u00e7tan muaf tutuldu\u011funa i\u015faret edilerek, ”Bu \u015fekilde, 1 Ekim 2011 tarihinden \u00f6nce t\u00fcketiciler taraf\u0131ndan 12-18 TL \u00f6deyerek dava a\u00e7abilirken, bu g\u00fcn tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re t\u00fcketiciler en az 450-500 TL \u00f6demek zorundad\u0131r. Bu durumda t\u00fcketici yurtta\u015fa ‘paran varsa hak arayabilirsin’ denilerek, \u00fclkemizde sosyal hukuk devleti anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r” ifadesine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

”KAMU YARARINA UYGUNLUK \u0130LKES\u0130 YOK SAYILMI\u015eTIR”<\/strong><\/p>\n

TKHK’n\u0131n 22. maddesi ile d\u00fczenlenen ”De\u011feri 1.031,87 TL’nin (2011 y\u0131l\u0131) alt\u0131nda bulunan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda t\u00fcketici sorunlar\u0131 hakem heyetlerine ba\u015fvuru zorunludur. Bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda heyetin verece\u011fi kararlar taraflar\u0131 ba\u011flar. Bu kararlar \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununun ilamlar\u0131n yerine getirilmesi hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yerine getirilir. Taraflar bu kararlara kar\u015f\u0131 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde t\u00fcketici mahkemesine itiraz edebilirler” h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmleri taraf\u0131ndan ihlal edildi\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

Herhangi bir \u00fccret \u00f6demeden ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131labilen t\u00fcketici sorunlar\u0131 hakem heyetlerinin verdi\u011fi bir karar\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in, t\u00fcketici mahkemesinde dava a\u00e7\u0131lmak istendi\u011finde en az 450-500 TL’yi bulan gider avans\u0131 talep edildi\u011fi belirtilen dilek\u00e7ede, \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

”TKHK’n\u0131n 23. maddesinde basit usulde yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n temel al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve t\u00fcketici mahkemeleri nezdinde t\u00fcketiciler, t\u00fcketici \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ve bakanl\u0131k\u00e7a a\u00e7\u0131lacak davalar\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc resim ve har\u00e7tan muaf tutulmas\u0131, hak aramay\u0131 te\u015fvik amac\u0131yla t\u00fcketici \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin t\u00fcketicileri genel olarak ilgilendiren konularda a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalarda bilirki\u015fi \u00fccretlerinin bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denmesi h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin gider avans\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi nedeniyle t\u00fcketici \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin dava a\u00e7maya ili\u015fkin yasal haklar\u0131 elinden al\u0131narak yasan\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere hi\u00e7bir hukuk h\u00fckm\u00fc makable te\u015fmil (\u00f6ncesini kapsama) edilemez ve kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131 ihlal edemez. Oysa tebli\u011fle gelen bu h\u00fck\u00fcmler t\u00fcketicilerin kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali niteli\u011finde olup bu nedenle iptali gerekmektedir. Bakanl\u0131k, tebli\u011fe ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenleme yaparken T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinde sorumlu G\u00fcmr\u00fck ve Ticaret Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 ve Piyasa G\u00f6zetimi Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini alma gere\u011fi bile duymam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

Dava konusu tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde TKHK’n\u0131n 1. maddesinde belirtilen ‘kamu yarar\u0131na uygunluk ilkesi’ de yok say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Neredeyse asgari \u00fccretli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ya da bu \u00fccret \u00fczerinden emekli olan milyonlarca t\u00fcketici oldu\u011funu bir an d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrsek, bir t\u00fcketiciden ayl\u0131k maa\u015f\u0131na yak\u0131n tutarda gider avans\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 hak ve nefaset \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclerine ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Gider Avans Tebli\u011fi’nin 4. maddesinde ke\u015fif tutar\u0131 adl\u0131 kaleme t\u00fcketici davalar\u0131nda ihtiya\u00e7 duyulmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n bu kalemin ula\u015f\u0131m \u00fccreti ile birlikte al\u0131nmas\u0131, di\u011fer i\u015f ve i\u015flemler ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda 50 TL olarak kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmayan bir rakam tahsil edilmesi dava s\u00fcrecinde gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi belli olmayan bilirki\u015fi \u00fccreti ile taraf say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n be\u015f kat\u0131 tutar\u0131nda tebligat gideri talep edilmesi ve yine t\u00fcketici davalar\u0131nda gerek duyulmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 en az \u00fc\u00e7 tan\u0131k asgari \u00fccreti ve tebligat gideri al\u0131nmas\u0131 son derece haks\u0131z talepler olarak dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 imkans\u0131zla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fini ortaya koymu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n

Kaynak : Habert\u00fcrk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Dava a\u00e7ma \u00fccretleri 20 – 30 kat\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131!<\/p>\n

T\u00fcketici \u00d6rg\u00fctleri Federasyonu (T\u00d6F), Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Gider Avans\u0131 Tarifesi Hakk\u0131nda Tebli\u011f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 ve iptaline karar verilmesi i\u00e7in Dan\u0131\u015ftay’da dava a\u00e7t\u0131. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41695"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41695\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}