![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/51181.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nErgenekon mahkemesinin isimlerini sordu\u011fu o savc\u0131lar HSYK’daki de\u011fi\u015fiklikle birlikte Yarg\u0131tay’daki g\u00f6revlerinden ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130STANBUL- \u0130kinci Ergenekon davas\u0131na bakan \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, Ak Parti\u2019ye ili\u015fkin Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nde a\u00e7\u0131lan parti kapatma davas\u0131yla ilgili olarak Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada g\u00f6rev alan savc\u0131lar\u0131n kimler oldu\u011funun bildirilmesine karar verdi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, ikinci Ergenekon davas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcnk\u00fc 132. duru\u015fmas\u0131nda, 12 A\u011fustos\u2019ta g\u00f6r\u00fclen duru\u015fmada san\u0131k ve avukatlar\u0131n talepleriyle ilgili ara karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131ran mahkeme, Ak Parti\u2019ye ili\u015fkin Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne a\u00e7\u0131lan kapatma davas\u0131yla ilgili olarak Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturmada g\u00f6rev alan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131lar\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kimler oldu\u011fu, soru\u015fturman\u0131n hangi a\u015famas\u0131nda soru\u015fturmaya kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak sorulmas\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme, bu karar\u0131 herhangi bir san\u0131k, avukat ya da savc\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine de\u011fil resen (kendili\u011finden) ald\u0131. Mahkeme, 20 A\u011fustos 2010\u2019da da resen ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararla, Ak Parti hakk\u0131ndaki kapatma davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin dosyan\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin dava dosyas\u0131na konulmas\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Anayasa Mahkemesi de mahkemenin bu talebi \u00fczerine 7 Ekim 2010\u2019da kapatmaya ili\u015fkin dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011fini mahkemeye g\u00f6ndermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
AK PART\u0130 MA\u011eDUR DE\u011e\u0130L AMA…<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130kinci Ergenekon davas\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini olu\u015fturan ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Ergenekon iddianamelerinde AK Parti \u201cma\u011fdur\u201d ya da \u201cm\u00fc\u015fteki\u201d olarak yer alm\u0131yor. Ancak, iki iddianamede de Ak Parti\u2019ye y\u00f6nelik faaliyetlere ili\u015fkin b\u00f6l\u00fcmler bulunuyor. Her iki iddianamenin san\u0131klar\u0131 da \u201cT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti H\u00fck\u00fcmetini ortadan kald\u0131rmaya veya g\u00f6revlerini yapmas\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131smen veya engellemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131lan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n Milliyet’in haberine g\u00f6re, Ak Parti, Ergenekon iddianameleriyle ba\u015flayan davalar s\u00fcrecinde bir tek \u201c\u0130rticayla M\u00fccadele Eylem Plan\u0131\u201d davas\u0131nda \u201cm\u00fc\u015fteki\u201d s\u0131fat\u0131yla yer al\u0131yor. Ak Parti\u2019nin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 davas\u0131 ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak ikinci Ergenekon iddianamesinin i\u00e7inde yer buluyor. \u201cAdalet ve Kalk\u0131nma Partisine y\u00f6nelik y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen faaliyetler\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda bu konu \u015f\u00f6yle anlat\u0131l\u0131yor:<\/p>\n \u201cSoru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda elde edilen delillerden Ergenekon ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn 2002 y\u0131l\u0131 genel se\u00e7imlerinden sonra AKP\u2019ye y\u00f6nelik kapsaml\u0131 bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, darbe planlar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde AKP\u2019yi par\u00e7alamay\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylelikle h\u00fck\u00fcmetten d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyi hedefledikleri, yapt\u0131klar\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalarla bunu tamamen ba\u015faramam\u0131\u015f olsalar da bir k\u0131s\u0131m AKP\u2019li milletvekillerini koparmay\u0131 ba\u015fard\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n PART\u0130DEN KOPARMAK \u0130STED\u0130LER<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130ddianamedeki Ak Parti\u2019yle ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcm \u015f\u00f6yle devam ediyor: \u201cAKP\u2019yi b\u00f6lme ve par\u00e7alama hedeflerini tam olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiremeyince, \u201ckapatma davas\u0131\u201dn\u0131 etkilemek i\u00e7in davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anayasa Mahkemesi ile ilgili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar yapt\u0131klar\u0131, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede mahkeme \u00fcyelerine y\u00f6nelik karalama ve y\u0131pratma ama\u00e7l\u0131 faaliyet y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri, bu faaliyetlerini y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcrken t\u00fcm AKP\u2019li milletvekilleri ile ilgili kapsaml\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar yapt\u0131klar\u0131, milletvekillerini dini, siyasi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine ve \u0131rki k\u00f6kenlerine g\u00f6re ayr\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak ki\u015fisel verileri kaydettikleri, baz\u0131 AKP\u2019li milletvekilleri ve belediye ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131 partiden koparmak i\u00e7in bire bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler ve y\u00f6nlendirmeler yapt\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n \u00dc\u00c7 SAVCI DA G\u0130TT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n AK Parti\u2019ye y\u00f6nelik kapatma davas\u0131n\u0131n iddianamesinde, emekliye ayr\u0131lan Yarg\u0131tay Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 Abdurrahman Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya\u2019n\u0131n imzas\u0131 bulunuyordu. \u0130ddianamenin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131nda ise Yarg\u0131tay savc\u0131lar\u0131 Zekeriya Sevimli, \u00d6mer Faruk Emina\u011fao\u011flu \u00f6nemli rol oynad\u0131. \u0130ddianameye savc\u0131 Mahir Kara\u2019n\u0131n da katk\u0131 sundu\u011fu kamuoyuna yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u0130ddianamenin ilk a\u015famalar\u0131 ve Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Abdullah G\u00fcl\u2019e y\u00f6nelik b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin eski YARSAV Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve YARGI-Sen kurucusu Emina\u011fao\u011flu taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtiliyordu.<\/p>\n \u0130ddianameden as\u0131l sorumlu savc\u0131n\u0131n ise Sevimli oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 12 Eyl\u00fcl referandumuyla yap\u0131s\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirilen HSYK, 19 Haziran tarihli yaz kararnamesiyle Yarg\u0131tay savc\u0131lar\u0131ndan Sevimli\u2019yi \u0130stanbul \u00dcsk\u00fcdar\u2019a savc\u0131; Kara\u2019y\u0131 \u0130stanbul\u2019a savc\u0131; Emina\u011fao\u011flu\u2019nu da \u0130stanbul\u2019a hakim olarak atad\u0131. 12 A\u011fustos tarihli kararnameyle de baz\u0131 atamalar iptal edildi ve Kara\u2019y\u0131 Sincan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nda g\u00f6revlendirdi. Kara, Sevimli ve Emina\u011fao\u011flu\u2019nun g\u00f6rev yeri de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 Hasan Erbil\u2019in iste\u011fi do\u011frultusunda yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. HSYK, Kara\u2019n\u0131n g\u00f6rev yeri de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fini iptal ederken, \u0130stanbul\u2019un farkl\u0131 adliyelerine atanan Sevimli ile Emina\u011fao\u011flu hakk\u0131nda itirazlara ra\u011fmen bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapmad\u0131.<\/p>\n