{"id":38719,"date":"2011-08-18T12:11:08","date_gmt":"2011-08-18T09:11:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=38719"},"modified":"2011-08-18T15:15:08","modified_gmt":"2011-08-18T12:15:08","slug":"ahmet-sik-emniyetteki-delili-nasil-karartacak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=38719","title":{"rendered":"‘Ahmet \u015e\u0131k, Emniyet’teki delili nas\u0131l karartacak?’"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Gazeteci Ahmet \u015e\u0131k’\u0131n tutuklu kalmas\u0131na muhalefet \u015ferhi koyan \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131, yaln\u0131z kald\u0131. Ba\u015fkan\u0131n muhalefet gerek\u00e7elerindeki tespitler dikkat \u00e7ekiyor.<\/p>\n

Gazeteci Ahmet \u015e\u0131k’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu 5 ki\u015finin tahliye talepleri oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla reddedildi. \u0130\u015fte bu karara kat\u0131lmayan \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay’\u0131n \u00e7ok konu\u015fulacak gerek\u00e7eleri:\u00a0<\/p>\n

1- “Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z, tarafs\u0131z, adil ve insan vicdan\u0131na uygunluk k\u0131staslar\u0131na uygun de\u011fil”<\/p>\n

2- “\u015e\u00fcphelilerin emniyetteki delilleri nas\u0131l karartacaklar\u0131 izah edilmemi\u015ftir”<\/p>\n

3- “Kitab\u0131 daha yay\u0131nlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r bile. Buna ra\u011fmen yay\u0131nlama d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011funu belirterek bu ki\u015fiyi \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibatland\u0131rmak hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir”<\/p>\n

4- “Bug\u00fcne kadar hi\u00e7bir yay\u0131nc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda veya yazan ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00fclkemizde verilmi\u015f tek bir karar yoktur.”<\/p>\n

Ergenekon soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda Odatv\u2019de yap\u0131lan aramalar sonucu tutuklanan Gazeteci Ahmet \u015e\u0131k\u2019\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu 5 ki\u015finin tahliye talepleri reddedildi. Ancak karar oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay, karara muhalefet ederek \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tahliyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdi. Ak\u00e7ay, Balyoz davas\u0131ndaki muhalefet \u015ferhleriyle de di\u011fer hakimlerle ayr\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f, uzun muhalefet gerek\u00e7eleriyle dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

“TAHL\u0130YE TALEB\u0130NE RET” KARARINA YAPILAN \u0130T\u0130RAZ DA REDDED\u0130LD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Odatv\u2019de yap\u0131lan aramalar sonras\u0131nda tutuklanan Gazeteciler Ahmet \u015e\u0131k, Do\u011fan Yurdakul, Sait \u00c7ak\u0131r, Co\u015fkun Musluk, Bar\u0131\u015f Terko\u011flu\u2019nun avukatlar\u0131 \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin n\u00f6bet\u00e7i hakimli\u011fine ba\u015fvurarak tahliye talebinde bulundu. Bu talepleri reddedilen avukatlar, bu karara itiraz etti. \u0130tiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi heyeti tahliye taleplerini oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddetti.<\/p>\n

KARAR 2 \u00dcYE HAK\u0130M\u0130N OYUYLA<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00dcye hakimler Metin \u00d6z\u00e7elik ve Birol\u2019un tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdi\u011fi kararda, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerlerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi ve at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u00e7in ceza yasas\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ceza s\u00fcresi, dosyada yap\u0131lan aramalarda ele ge\u00e7enlerle ilgili arama ve el koyma tutanaklar\u0131 ile bunlara ili\u015fkin tespit tutanaklar\u0131 i\u00e7erikleri, dosyadaki ileti\u015fim tespit tutanaklar\u0131 i\u00e7eriklerinin g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi. \u015e\u00fcpheliler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin var oldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca \u015f\u00fcphelilerin delilleri karartma ve yeni delil elde edilmesine engel olma tehlikesinin bulundu\u011fu, \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda bu a\u015famada adli kontrol h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen kararda \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tutukluluk hallerinin devam\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi.<\/p>\n

BA\u015eKAN AK\u00c7AY MUHALEFET ETT\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ancak Mahkeme Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay bu karara muhalefet ederek, Ahmet \u015e\u0131k\u2019\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu 5 \u015f\u00fcphelinin tahliyesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kulland\u0131. Ba\u015fkan Ak\u00e7ay, soru\u015fturma ile ilgili t\u00fcm dosyalar\u0131n g\u00f6nderilmesi i\u00e7in savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak toplamda 27 klas\u00f6r\u00fcn g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n

\u015e\u00dcPHEL\u0130LER\u0130N FAAL\u0130YET\u0130 K\u0130TAP YAZMAK<\/strong><\/p>\n

Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda tutuklu bulunan Ahmet \u015e\u0131k\u2019\u0131n “\u0130mam\u0131n Ordusu” adl\u0131 bir kitap yazma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011fu ve bu konuda haz\u0131rl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, kitab\u0131n tasla\u011f\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu haz\u0131rlama a\u015famas\u0131nda ODA TV ile irtibatl\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yapan Ak\u00e7ay, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin tek faaliyetlerinin yay\u0131n yapmak, kitap yazmak ve benzeri faaliyetler oldu\u011funu ifade etti.<\/p>\n

\u015e\u00fcphelilerin Ergenekon davas\u0131nda yarg\u0131lanan san\u0131klarla birlikte hareket etti\u011fine dair herhangi bir iddia olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Ba\u015fkan Ak\u00e7ay, \u201c\u0130ddia 2009 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda yay\u0131n yapma iddias\u0131d\u0131r. \u00d6zellikle Ahmet \u015e\u0131k\u2019\u0131n yazmak istedi\u011fi kitab\u0131n bir an yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnelim ve burada da Ergenekon \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc en \u015fiddetli bir \u015fekilde \u00f6vd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnelim. Mahkememizde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davalarda yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcc\u00fc ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc PKK, sol \u00f6rg\u00fctlerden DHKP-C, MLKP, T\u0130KKO gibi \u00f6rg\u00fctlerle ilgili yaz\u0131lan pek \u00e7ok kitaptan dolay\u0131 CMK 250. Madde ile yetkili mahkemelerde pek \u00e7ok dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve bu kitaplar\u0131n pek \u00e7o\u011funda da belirtilen \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin eylemleri \u00e7ok net bir \u015fekilde \u00f6v\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f, militanlar\u0131ndan yine \u00f6vg\u00fclerle bahsedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ancak bu yay\u0131nlarla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 yapmak” su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bug\u00fcne kadar hi\u00e7bir yay\u0131nc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda veya yazan ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00fclkemizde verilmi\u015f tek bir karar yoktur. T\u00fcm\u00fc 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 yasaya muhalefetten ceza alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r veya beraat etmi\u015ftir. Kald\u0131 ki \u015f\u00fcphelinin kitab\u0131 daha yay\u0131nlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r bile. Buna ra\u011fmen yay\u0131nlama d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011funu belirterek bu ki\u015fiyi bu \u00f6rg\u00fctle irtibatland\u0131rmak hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir” dedi.<\/p>\n

Anayasa, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131ndan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ilgili maddelere de yer veren Ak\u00e7ay, \u201cYaz\u0131lan kitab\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini be\u011fenmeyebilirsiniz. Do\u011fru de\u011fildir. Abart\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Yaland\u0131r diye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclebilir. Ama sonu\u00e7ta \u015f\u00fcphelinin kendi fikir ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceleridir. \u0130nsanlar bir kitab\u0131 yazarken ba\u015fkalar\u0131ndan da yard\u0131m alabilirler. Bu kitapta al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f m\u0131d\u0131r? Al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f m\u0131d\u0131r? \u015eu anda bir \u015fey s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir an i\u00e7in yard\u0131m al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131m kabul etsek sonu\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fir mi? De\u011fi\u015fmez. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir insan\u0131n bir kitab\u0131 yazarken ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapmas\u0131, ba\u015fka insanlardan yard\u0131m almas\u0131 do\u011fald\u0131r ve herhangi bir su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmaz. Bir habercilik ve yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k insanlarla ili\u015fkiye girmeden, haber toplamadan nas\u0131l yap\u0131labilir?”<\/p>\n

EMN\u0130YET’TEK\u0130 DEL\u0130LLER\u0130 NASIL KARARTACAKLAR?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mahkemenin \u201cdelilleri karartma ve yeni delil elde edilmesini engelleme” \u015feklindeki ret gerek\u00e7esi i\u00e7in Ba\u015fkan, \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 tane emniyete yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda toplanmas\u0131 gereken delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek, \u201c\u015e\u00fcphelilerin emniyetteki delilleri nas\u0131l karartacaklar\u0131 izah edilmemi\u015ftir” dedi. Mahkeme Ba\u015fkan\u0131 muhalefet \u015ferhini \u015fu \u015fekilde tamamlad\u0131:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u015e\u00fcphelilerin tutuklu yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 m\u0131 gerekir sorusuna cevap vermek laz\u0131md\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcpheli kim olursa olsun, hangi dilden hangi dinden, hangi siyasi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ften, hangi \u0131rktan olursa olsun ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z, tarafs\u0131z, adil ve insan vicdan\u0131na uygun bir \u015fekilde soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu insan\u0131n do\u011fal hakk\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n bu k\u0131staslara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerek tutuklama kararlar\u0131nda gerek tahliye taleplerinin reddi kararlar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eleri Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve CMK a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli ve yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yasa\u011f\u0131 konmak ve g\u00fcn a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 polise imza vermek ko\u015fuluyla tahliyeleri gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde oldu\u011fumdan \u00fcye hakimlerin yeterli gerek\u00e7e ta\u015f\u0131mayan talebin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.”<\/p>\n

BA\u015eKAN AK\u00c7AY \u015e\u0130KE KARARINI \u00d6RNEK G\u00d6STERD\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tahliye talebini oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddeden mahkeme, ODA Tv soru\u015fturmas\u0131ndaki baz\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelilerin k\u0131s\u0131tlama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti. Ancak bu talep de oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddedildi. Ba\u015fkan Ak\u00e7ay , bu karara da muhalefet etti ve gerek\u00e7esinde \u2018\u015fike soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131\u2019 g\u00f6sterdi. Ba\u015fkan Ak\u00e7ay, \u201cG\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde \u015fike dosyas\u0131 olarak bilinen ve yine k\u0131s\u0131tlama olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ve vekillerinin inceleyemedi\u011fi dosyadaki bir k\u0131s\u0131m evraklar\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye Futbol Federasyonu\u2019na verilmi\u015f ve daha sonra da k\u0131s\u0131tlama karar\u0131 k\u0131smen kald\u0131r\u0131larak \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ve vekillerinin dosyay\u0131 inceleme imkan\u0131 sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken husus t\u00fcm dosya hakk\u0131nda gizlilik karar\u0131 varken ve t\u00fcm dosya futbol federasyonuna verilmedi\u011fi halde k\u0131s\u0131tlama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Uygulamada yasal olarak bu t\u00fcr tasarruflarda bulunulma imkan\u0131 oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re bundan her \u015f\u00fcphelinin ve her \u015f\u00fcpheli vekilinin e\u015fitlik kural\u0131 gere\u011fince yararlanmas\u0131 gerekir” dedi ve k\u0131s\u0131tlama karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oy kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n

‘DANGALAK D\u0130YORLAR’<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay daha \u00f6nce yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 muhalefet \u015ferhleri nedeniyle baz\u0131 meslekta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine selam vermeyi dahi kestiklerini belirtmi\u015fti. Balyoz san\u0131klar\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki yakalama emrinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131ndan sonra \u2018sizin de dangalak bir karar\u0131n\u0131z gelecek\u2019 diyen h\u00e2kimin oldu\u011funu kaydeden Ak\u00e7ay, \u201cMahkememizin \u00fcyelerinin de nezaket kurallar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar i\u00e7erisine girdikleri ve i\u015fi en son ba\u015fkan ile konu\u015fmama a\u015famas\u0131na getirdikleri g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup, bu hususlar\u0131n da kamuoyunca bilinmesinde yarar oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcndeyim\u201d demi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Kaynak : Radikal.com.tr<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Gazeteci Ahmet \u015e\u0131k’\u0131n tutuklu kalmas\u0131na muhalefet \u015ferhi koyan \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131, yaln\u0131z kald\u0131. Ba\u015fkan\u0131n muhalefet gerek\u00e7elerindeki tespitler dikkat \u00e7ekiyor.<\/p>\n

Gazeteci Ahmet \u015e\u0131k’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu 5 ki\u015finin tahliye talepleri oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla reddedildi. \u0130\u015fte bu karara kat\u0131lmayan \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay’\u0131n \u00e7ok <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=38719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=38719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=38719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=38719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}