{"id":36090,"date":"2010-02-22T12:50:11","date_gmt":"2010-02-22T10:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=19676"},"modified":"2010-02-22T12:50:11","modified_gmt":"2010-02-22T10:50:11","slug":"cihanerin-dosyasi-tekrar-erzurumda-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=36090","title":{"rendered":"Cihaner’in dosyas\u0131 tekrar Erzurum’da"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Ergenekon soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tutuklanan Erzincan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 \u0130lhan Cihaner’in dosyas\u0131, yetkisizlik karar\u0131yla Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na iade edildi. Dosyan\u0131n \u0130stanbul’a g\u00f6nderilmesi tart\u0131\u015fma yaratm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/p>\n

Sultanahmet’teki \u0130stanbul Adliyesi’nde bas\u0131n mensuplar\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131klama yapan \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 Aykut Cengiz Engin, “Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca ‘yetkisizlik’ karar\u0131yla ilgili g\u00f6nderilen dosya, \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n CMK 250. madde ile yetkili biriminde g\u00f6revli Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Vekilleri ve Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131lar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan incelenmi\u015f ve su\u00e7 yeri itibar\u0131yla yarg\u0131 alan\u0131m\u0131z d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, ‘yetkisizlik’ karar\u0131 verilerek dosya, kurye ile Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na iade edilmi\u015ftir” dedi.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Engin, “dosyada ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda yetki ve g\u00f6rev hususundaki t\u00fcm de\u011ferlendirmeler, Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

\u0130lhan Cihaner hakk\u0131ndaki soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 \u0130stanbul’a g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f ve dosya, iki ba\u015fsavc\u0131vekili ile iki Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan incelemeye al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Y\u00fcksek Kurulu (HSYK) taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6zel yetkisi kald\u0131r\u0131lan savc\u0131 Osman \u015eanal’\u0131n dosyay\u0131 h\u0131zla \u0130stanbul’a g\u00f6ndermesi ise tart\u0131\u015fma yaratm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. >><\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Bir tahliye talebi daha <\/strong><\/p>\n

Cihaner’in avukat\u0131 Turgut Kazan da, m\u00fcvekkilinin “ivedilikle sal\u0131verilmesi” talebiyle Be\u015fikta\u015f’taki \u00d6zel Yetkili \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na dilek\u00e7e verdi.<\/p>\n

Avukat Turgut Kazan, m\u00fcvekkilinin “t\u0131pk\u0131 \u00f6zel yetkili mahkeme naip hakiminin Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131 veya Ba\u015fbakan’\u0131 tutuklamas\u0131 gibi” tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek derhal sal\u0131verilmesini ve bug\u00fcne kadar yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin yok say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na 2 sayfal\u0131k bir dilek\u00e7e sunan Avukat Turgut Kazan, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 \u0130lhan Cihaner\u2019in 2002 y\u0131l\u0131nda birinci s\u0131n\u0131fa ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nde yarg\u0131lanabilece\u011fini hat\u0131rlatt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, “\u00d6zel yetkili Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n nezdinde bulunduklar\u0131 \u00f6zel yetkili a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemelerinin bakamayaca\u011f\u0131 davalar\u0131n soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 yapamayacaklar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekir” denilerek, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn 27 May\u0131s 2009 tarihli ve \u00c7etin \u015een imzal\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu ger\u00e7e\u011fi de\u011fi\u015ftiremeyece\u011fini vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n

“Yasal yol izlenmedi” <\/strong><\/p>\n

Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 Cihaner\u2019in soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda bu yasal yolun izlenmedi\u011finin \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dilek\u00e7ede, soru\u015fturman\u0131n 2802 say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu\u2019na ayk\u0131r\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak arama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi ve yine yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak sorgu yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen dilek\u00e7ede, yasan\u0131n 85. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak g\u00f6revli mahkemece de\u011fil, g\u00f6revsiz ve yetkisiz bir naip hakimce tutuklama karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi anlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

“Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n tutuklanmas\u0131 gibi” <\/strong><\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, tutuklamaya yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n da yasan\u0131n 92. maddesinde g\u00f6sterilen g\u00f6revli mahkemece de\u011fil, g\u00f6revsiz ve yetkisiz mahkemenin ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan bir hakim taraf\u0131ndan reddedildi\u011fi ifade edilen dilek\u00e7ede Avukat Kazan, “Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, tutuklama dahil, Erzurum \u00d6zel Yetkili Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile naip hakimli\u011fince al\u0131nan kararla yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 yoktur. T\u0131pk\u0131 cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131, ba\u015fbakan\u0131n \u2018tutuklamalar\u0131\u2019 gibidir. Hepsi yok h\u00fckm\u00fcndedir. Nitekim HSYK\u2019n\u0131n yetkiye ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 da s\u00f6ylediklerimizi do\u011fruluyor. Bu nedenle, \u00e7uvallar dolusu yaz\u0131l\u0131 belgenin tasnifi, incelenmesi ile yetki ve g\u00f6rev gibi sorunlar\u0131n d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcp de\u011ferlendirilmesi beklenmeden i\u015flemlerin hepsi ve \u00f6zellikle bir ba\u015fsavc\u0131n\u0131n fiilen tutulmu\u015f olmas\u0131, t\u00fcm\u00fcyle yok say\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekece\u011fi gibi, \u00f6ncelik ve ivedilikle m\u00fcvekkilimin sal\u0131verilmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 diliyorum” dedi.<\/p>\n

CNN T\u00dcRK<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Ergenekon soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda tutuklanan Erzincan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 \u0130lhan Cihaner’in dosyas\u0131, yetkisizlik karar\u0131yla Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na iade edildi. Dosyan\u0131n \u0130stanbul’a g\u00f6nderilmesi tart\u0131\u015fma yaratm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36090\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}