{"id":32577,"date":"2011-05-11T18:59:11","date_gmt":"2011-05-11T15:59:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=32577"},"modified":"2011-05-11T18:59:11","modified_gmt":"2011-05-11T15:59:11","slug":"yokte-sanik-olmali","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=32577","title":{"rendered":"Y\u00d6K’te San\u0131k Olmal\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

ANKARA – \u00d6l\u00e7me, Se\u00e7me ve Yerle\u015ftirme Merkezi, YGS\u00a0ile ilgili Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’ne a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n savunma metninde, ”davan\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenerek Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n da daval\u0131 konumuna al\u0131nmas\u0131”\u00a0gerekti\u011fini belirtti. \u00d6SYM’nin, YGS’deki \u015fifre iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerine s\u0131nav\u0131n iptali istemiyle Konyal\u0131 bir \u00f6\u011frenci ad\u0131na Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesine a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya y\u00f6nelik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunma metninde, davan\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenerek Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n (Y\u00d6K) da daval\u0131 konumuna al\u0131nmas\u0131 talep edilerek, Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn de YGS s\u0131nav\u0131 ile do\u011frudan ilgisinin bulundu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Davay\u0131 a\u00e7an ki\u015finin yasal \u015fart i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen menfaat ihlalini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ortaya koymas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, s\u00f6ylenti ve ispatlanmam\u0131\u015f bilgi ve iddialara dayal\u0131 hi\u00e7bir somut delile dayanmayan davan\u0131n reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

”S\u0131nava kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten davac\u0131n\u0131n, hangi menfaatinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ortaya koymadan dava a\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n esasa girilmeksizin reddini gerektirdi\u011fi kanaati ta\u015f\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Davan\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle usule uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir” denilerek, davan\u0131n usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddedilmesi talep edildi.<\/p>\n

Metinde, \u00d6SYM’nin yakla\u015f\u0131k 20-25 milyon civar\u0131nda bir n\u00fcfus \u00fczerinde etkisi olan bir kurum oldu\u011fu ifade edilerek, kurumun bu etkiyi g\u00f6z ard\u0131 etmeden \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 en \u00fcst d\u00fczeyde titizlikle y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde 2011-YGS’de belli bir \u015fifre tekni\u011fi kullan\u0131larak \u00f6zellikle Matematik sorular\u0131nda do\u011fru cevaplara ula\u015f\u0131labildi\u011fi ve bunun \u00d6SYM taraf\u0131ndan kabul edildi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi belirtilerek, s\u0131navda yer alan sorular\u0131n bir \u015fifre tekni\u011fi kullan\u0131larak cevap anahtar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n tamamen ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan durumun soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bas\u0131l\u0131 ile ilgili geli\u015ftirilmi\u015f olan yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nemde kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Bunun hi\u00e7bir adaya \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya iletilme ihtimalinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tekrarlanarak, s\u0131nav sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi sonucunda b\u00f6yle bir durumun da s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Matematik testinde 37 ve \u00fczeri net yapan adaylar aras\u0131ndan 10 bin 500 aday\u0131n kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tek tek incelendi\u011fi ve adaylar\u0131n sorular\u0131 bizzat \u00e7\u00f6zerek cevaplad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ifade edilerek, ”Ayr\u0131ca bir bilgisayar program\u0131 yaz\u0131larak s\u0131nava giren 1 milyon 692 bin 345 aday\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n cevap anahtar\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irilmi\u015f ve iddia edildi\u011fi \u015fekilde en b\u00fcy\u00fck say\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131ndaki cevaplar\u0131 i\u015faretleyenlere rastlan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 40 sorudan 23 soruda ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu iddia edilen bu durumda \u00f6zellikle di\u011fer sorularda da benzer \u015fekilde i\u015faretlemeler yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmi\u015f ve iddia edilen d\u00fczene\u011fin kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tek bir bulguya rastlan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan iddia edilen durumun, cevap anahtar\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rlan\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan algoritma sisteminin do\u011fal sonucu oldu\u011fu ifade edilerek, ”Burada bir art niyet arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi gibi bir \u015fifreleme (bu ifadeyi asla kabul etmedi\u011fimizi vurgulayarak) var ise \u015fifrelemenin fark\u0131na varmak i\u00e7in do\u011fru cevaplar\u0131n biliniyor olmas\u0131 gerekmez mi? S\u0131nava giren hangi aday bir \u015fifreleme tekni\u011fini ara\u015ft\u0131rabilir?” ifadesi kullan\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

FARKLI K\u0130TAP\u00c7IK”\u00a0SAVUNMASI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Matematik testinde iddia edildi\u011finin aksine hi\u00e7bir aday\u0131n soruyu \u00e7\u00f6zmeden cevaplar\u0131 i\u015faretleme yoluna gitmedi\u011finin alt\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7izildi\u011fi metinde, 2011-YGS’ye giren adaylar\u0131n s\u0131nav sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n incelendi\u011finde uygulanan bu s\u0131nav\u0131n 2010-YGS’den farkl\u0131 bir sonuca yol a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esindeki \u015fifreli oldu\u011fu iddia edilen Matematik testi ile ilgili olarak adaylar\u0131n genel ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7en y\u0131l yap\u0131lan s\u0131nava g\u00f6re azald\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkat \u00e7ekilen metinde, ”Bu durumda ‘uzmanlar\u0131n \u015fifre olsayd\u0131 ba\u015far\u0131 d\u00fc\u015fmez y\u00fckselirdi’ s\u00f6yleminin do\u011fru oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r”\u00a0denildi.<\/p>\n

Metinde, 2011-YGS Matematik Testi’nde adaylar\u0131n sorular\u0131 do\u011fru yan\u0131tlama oranlar\u0131na da yer verildi. 40 sorunun tamam\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru bilen aday say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7en y\u0131l 2 bin 141 iken bu y\u0131l bin 805 oldu\u011fu kaydedilen metinde, 2011-YGS\u00a0Matematik Testi’nde 3 bin 261 aday\u0131n 39, 4 bin 607 aday\u0131n 38, 5 bin 677 aday\u0131n 37, 7 bin 58 aday\u0131n 36, 8 bin 225 aday\u0131n 35 soruyu do\u011fru yan\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

Metinde, dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u015fifre ile ilgili iddialar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir dayana\u011f\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konuyla ilgili i\u015flemlerin bilimsel kurallara uydu\u011fu savunuldu.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde adaylar\u0131n foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n ve isimlerinin olmas\u0131n\u0131n hangi adaya hangi kitap\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131n verilece\u011finin \u00f6nceden bilinerek bu \u015fekilde kopya ihtimalinin g\u00fc\u00e7lendi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde iddialarda bulunuldu\u011fu belirtilerek, bu iddialar\u0131n hi\u00e7bir dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

Metinde, \u015fu savunma yap\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n

”Merkezimce adaylar\u0131n birbirlerine bakarak veya d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan yard\u0131m alarak kopya \u00e7ekmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla s\u0131navlarda daha \u00e7ok say\u0131da farkl\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131k uygulamas\u0131na ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha \u00f6nce uygulanan s\u0131navlarda olu\u015fturulan kitap\u00e7\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131nav\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015fiklik g\u00f6stermi\u015f, \u00f6rne\u011fin 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda YGS\u00a0ve KPSS’de 10 farkl\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131k kullan\u0131l\u0131rken daha k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7ekli s\u0131navlarda ise iki farkl\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131k t\u00fcr\u00fc kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Merkezimiz 2010 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar yap\u0131lan uygulamalarda kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 farkl\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131 s\u0131navdaki alt testleri olu\u015fturan maddeleri kendi i\u00e7inde yer de\u011fi\u015ftirerek olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur. Buna ra\u011fmen 2010 KPSS\u00a0Lisans S\u0131nav\u0131’nda oldu\u011fu gibi toplu kopya \u00e7ekildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilememi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle toplu kopya giri\u015fimine te\u015febb\u00fcs edenlerin artmas\u0131yla birlikti \u00f6zellikle s\u0131nav s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelebilecek istismarlar\u0131n da \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ebilmek amac\u0131yla her aday i\u00e7in farkl\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131k olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kitap\u00e7\u0131k \u00fczerinde aday\u0131n ad\u0131n\u0131n ve foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n yer almas\u0131 hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde hangi adaya hangi kitap\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131n verilece\u011finin \u00f6nceden bilinmesi nedeniyle kopya anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Bu y\u0131l uygulamaya konulan adaya \u00f6zg\u00fc soru kitap\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131yla geli\u015ftirilen bu sistem k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli yorumlanarak ortada somut hi\u00e7bir veri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, \u015fifre iddialar\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmekte ve bu \u015fekilde toplumun infiale kap\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olunmaktad\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

MADD\u0130 VE MANEV\u0130 YIPRANMASINDAN \u00d6TEYE G\u0130TMEYECEK<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00d6SYM, Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’ne a\u00e7\u0131lan dava ile ilgili yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunmada, ”adaylar\u0131n soru ve cevap ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan incelemelerde hi\u00e7bir kopya ya da \u015faibeye rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u0131nav\u0131n iptali yoluna gidilmesinin 1 milyon 700 bin \u00f6\u011frenci ile milyonlarca aile bireyinin maddi ve manevi y\u0131pranmas\u0131ndan \u00f6teye gitmeyece\u011fini”\u00a0belirtti.<\/p>\n

Savunmada, ”S\u0131nav\u0131n iptalinin istenmesinde ne bir hukuki gerek\u00e7e, ne bir hakl\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ne de kamu yarar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r”\u00a0denildi.<\/p>\n

Savunma metninde, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan iddialarla ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunularak, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere yer verildi. ”Her s\u0131nav kitap\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131nda soru yerlerinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu” y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ele\u015ftiriler, \u00d6SYM’nin savunmas\u0131nda \u015f\u00f6yle yan\u0131tland\u0131:<\/p>\n

”S\u0131navlarda kopya say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 azaltmak amac\u0131yla kitap\u00e7\u0131klar olu\u015fturulurken madde s\u0131ralamas\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin yan\u0131nda maddelerin se\u00e7eneklerinin yer de\u011fi\u015ftirmesinin, hatta madde i\u00e7eri\u011finde verilen birbirinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bilgilerin s\u0131ralamas\u0131n\u0131n yer de\u011fi\u015ftirmesinin, her bir s\u0131nav i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulabilecek kitap\u00e7\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 art\u0131raca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Merkezimiz bu konuda bir inceleme yapma gere\u011fi duymu\u015f ve b\u00f6yle bir uygulamaya ge\u00e7menin olas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rebilmek i\u00e7in kitap\u00e7\u0131klar olu\u015fturulurken uygulanacak metodun geli\u015ftirilmesinde yol g\u00f6stermek \u00fczere Merkezimiz taraf\u0131ndan bir \u00f6n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve deneme s\u0131nav\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Deneme s\u0131nav\u0131na giren \u00f6\u011frencilerin verdikleri cevaplara dayan\u0131larak maddelerin kitap\u00e7\u0131kta bulundu\u011fu yere veya se\u00e7eneklerin s\u0131ras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak \u00f6\u011frencilerin cevaplad\u0131klar\u0131 kitap\u00e7\u0131k t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re bir maddeyi do\u011fru cevapland\u0131rma olas\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131la\u015f\u0131p farkl\u0131la\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

KAPALI D\u00d6NEM<\/strong><\/p>\n

Savunma metninde \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

”2011-YGS’deki \u015fifre iddialar\u0131 ile ilgili olarak Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n YGS soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fczerinde, adaylar\u0131n cevap ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131 ve yapt\u0131klar\u0131 do\u011fru say\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerinde, \u00d6SYM ve matbaada fiilen bilirki\u015filer eliyle yapt\u0131klar\u0131 \u00e7ok boyutlu incelemesini tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u0131nav\u0131n iptalini gerektirecek herhangi bir olumsuzlu\u011fun tespit edilmedi\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Merkezimiz 2011-YGS sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

S\u00f6z konusu inceleme sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen rapor ile ilgili a\u00e7\u0131klamada herhangi bir kopya \u00e7ekme i\u015fleminin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, matbaadaki bilgisayarlar\u0131n incelenmesinden de d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya bir bilgi ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik g\u00fcvenlik a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmedi\u011fi, yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n METEKSAN firmas\u0131nca haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yan\u0131t sistemine uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

Metinde, soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bas\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemin ”kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nem” olarak nitelendirildi\u011fi belirtilerek, bu konuda detayl\u0131 bilgilere yer verildi. Metinde, bu d\u00f6nemin bir g\u00fcnden bir aya kadar s\u00fcrebilen soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131 dahil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm s\u0131nav evrak\u0131n\u0131n paketlendi\u011fi anlat\u0131larak, s\u0131nav i\u015flerini y\u00fcklenen firman\u0131n haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir bina i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi kaydedildi. Bina i\u00e7inde d\u00fcnya ile ileti\u015fimi sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik kablolu veya kablosuz her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ileti\u015fim arac\u0131n\u0131n susturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli olan sinyal kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n aktif oldu\u011fu, i\u00e7eriden d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ileti\u015fimin kurulamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin arama ve taramalar\u0131n, kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nemin ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce M\u0130T ve Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edildi.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcm g\u00f6revlilerin g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nlemlerinden ge\u00e7irilerek matbaa i\u00e7inde al\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nemin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi savunma metinde, matbaan\u0131n tek giri\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde 7\/24 esas\u0131na g\u00f6re 2 polisin, 1 \u00d6SYM g\u00f6revlisinin, 1 akademisyenin kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nem bitene kadar n\u00f6bet tuttuklar\u0131 ve her t\u00fcrl\u00fc olay\u0131 rapor ettikleri kaydedildi. Kapal\u0131 d\u00f6nem s\u00fcresince tek yetkilinin \u00d6SYM Ba\u015fkan\u0131 oldu\u011fu vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

KIZLARIN TEK B\u0130R OKULDA SINAVA G\u0130RMES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Savunma metninde kamuoyunda tart\u0131\u015fmalara yol a\u00e7an k\u0131z adaylar\u0131n tek bir okulda s\u0131nava girmesi uygulamas\u0131na da de\u011finilerek, ”Bu konuyla ilgili yap\u0131lan bas\u0131n duyurusunda, uygulaman\u0131n tamamen elektronik ortamda bilgisayar otomasyon program\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bir i\u015flem oldu\u011fu, \u00f6nceki y\u0131llarda da ayn\u0131 uygulaman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi belirtilerek adaylar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn tercihe ettikleri s\u0131nav merkezlerinde \u00f6ncelikle \u00f6\u011frenim durumuna ve cinsiyetlerine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilerek, kapasite fazlas\u0131 adaylar\u0131n kapasitesi dolmam\u0131\u015f s\u0131nav merkezlerine atand\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu durumdu k\u0131z adaylar\u0131n ilk tercihlerine atanmalar\u0131nda daha avantajl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015f ve bu uygulaman\u0131n bas\u0131nda yer alan iddialar\u0131n aksine hi\u00e7bir adaya avantaj sa\u011flamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n

Metinde, \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

”Adaylar\u0131n soru ve cevap ka\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan incelemelerde hi\u00e7bir kopya belirtisi ya da \u015faibeye rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u0131nav\u0131n iptali yoluna gidilmesinin 1 milyon 700 bin \u00f6\u011frenci ve milyonlarca aile bireyinin maddi ve manevi y\u0131pranmas\u0131ndan \u00f6teye gitmeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Kopyay\u0131 imkans\u0131z hale getiren, s\u0131navda yerine ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 sokma ihtimalini ortadan kald\u0131ran adaylar aras\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011fe yol a\u00e7mayan ve bilimsel a\u00e7\u0131dan yerindeli\u011fi test edilerek uygulanan bir s\u0131nav\u0131n iptalinin istenmesinde ne bir hukuki gerek\u00e7e, ne bir hakl\u0131 gerek\u00e7e, ne de kamu yarar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerde hukuka ve s\u0131navla ilgili d\u00fczenlemelere ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan merkezimizin hizmet kusurunun olu\u015ftu\u011fundan s\u00f6z edilmesi yerinde de\u011fildir. S\u0131nav sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu da d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde davan\u0131n art\u0131k art niyetli ki\u015filerce ve ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z ki\u015filerce desteklenece\u011fi ve kullan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Hi\u00e7bir aday lehine veya aleyhine bir uygulaman\u0131n hukuki delillerle sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda aksi y\u00f6nde verilecek bir iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131ndan ku\u015fku bulunmamaktad\u0131r. T\u00fcm bu nedenlerle davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a sadece pop\u00fclarist arg\u00fcmanlara dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan hukuki mesnetten yoksun davan\u0131n reddi gerekmektedir.”<\/p>\n

Savunma metnin sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda, davan\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenerek, Y\u00d6K Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n da daval\u0131 konumuna al\u0131nmas\u0131na; davan\u0131n di\u011fer usul h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00f6ncelikle usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine, ayr\u0131ca esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenerek ba\u015fta y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma talebi olmak \u00fczere davan\u0131n reddedilmesine karar verilmesi istendi.<\/p>\n

Kaynak : AA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

ANKARA – \u00d6l\u00e7me, Se\u00e7me ve Yerle\u015ftirme Merkezi, YGS ile ilgili Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’ne a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n savunma metninde, ”davan\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle usul y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenerek Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n da daval\u0131 konumuna al\u0131nmas\u0131” gerekti\u011fini belirtti. \u00d6SYM’nin, YGS’deki \u015fifre iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerine s\u0131nav\u0131n iptali istemiyle Konyal\u0131 bir \u00f6\u011frenci ad\u0131na Ankara 7. \u0130dare Mahkemesine a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32577\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}