{"id":2890,"date":"2009-01-19T09:12:44","date_gmt":"2009-01-19T07:12:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=2890"},"modified":"2009-01-19T09:12:44","modified_gmt":"2009-01-19T07:12:44","slug":"sabit-ucrette-yargitay-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=2890","title":{"rendered":"Sabit \u00fccrette Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2891\" title=\"Sabit \u00fccrette Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 \" src=\"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/30899e5c04a93b429d3080ddx.jpg\" alt=\"Sabit \u00fccrette Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 \" width=\"380\" height=\"199\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nev\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, T\u00fcrk Telekom&#8217;un abonelerinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;sabit \u00fccret&#8221;in hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesine kar\u015f\u0131n, Yarg\u0131tay 13 Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin, bir ba\u015fka yerel mahkemenin ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudaki karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nev\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, T\u00fcrk Telekom&#8217;un abonelerinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;sabit \u00fccret&#8221;in hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesi hukuki tart\u0131\u015fma yaratt\u0131. T\u00fcrk Telekom yetkilileri, benzer bir yerel mahkemenin ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudaki karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 13 Hukuk Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan bozuldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131lar.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nev\u015fehir&#8217;deki benzer bir dava da Bal\u0131kesir&#8217;de ya\u015fand\u0131. Bal\u0131kesir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 27 Haziran 2008 tarihinde verdi\u011fi &#8220;sabit \u00fccret al\u0131nmas\u0131 hukuka uygun de\u011fildir karar\u0131, T\u00fcrk Telekom taraf\u0131ndan temyize g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc ve 5 Aral\u0131k 2008 tarihinde Yarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi, karar\u0131 bozarak sabit \u00fccret al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;uygun&#8221; oldu\u011funa karar verdi. Yarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi, verdi\u011fi kararda, dava konusu sabit \u00fccretin yasa ile belirlenen bir \u00fccret oldu\u011fu belirtilerek, &#8220;T\u00fcrk Telekom taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan tarife Telekom\u00fcnikasyon Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan onayland\u0131ktan sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmekte ve uygulanmaktad\u0131r. Bu \u00fccretin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa Mahkemesinin 10 \u015eubat 2004 tarih ve 74-9 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile de belirlenmi\u015ftir. Sabit \u00fccretin, yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, abonenin telefon g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini sa\u011flamak \u00fczere b\u00fct\u00fcn y\u0131l boyunca telefon hatt\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye haz\u0131r tutulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, i\u015fletmeci \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan enerji t\u00fcketimi, teknik donan\u0131m\u0131, bak\u0131m ve y\u00f6netim ile personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan masraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu uygulaman\u0131n yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki telekom firmalar\u0131nca da yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha \u00f6nce Dairemizce temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lan dava dosyalar\u0131ndan bilinmektedir&#8221; denildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">YARGITAY: &#8220;SAB\u0130T \u00dcCRET YASAL VE HAKKAN\u0130YET GERE\u011e\u0130&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sabit \u00fccretin al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu masraflar\u0131n konu\u015fma \u00fccretlerine yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olaca\u011f\u0131 ve bu durumun aboneler aras\u0131nda adaletsizlik yarataca\u011f\u0131 belirtilen gerek\u00e7eli kararda, &#8220;Sabit \u00fccretin yasal ve hakkaniyet gere\u011fi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndedir. Kald\u0131 ki \u00fccret tarifeleri hizmet veren kurum taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanmakta ise de, bunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girip uygulanabilmesi, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir kurum olan Telekom\u00fcnikasyon Kurumu&#8217;nun uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcp onaylamas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Nitekim Telekom\u00fcnikasyon Kurumu aleyhine onaylad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarifelerin iptali talebiyle davalar a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu da taraflarca bilinmektedir&#8221; denildi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u015e\u0130MD\u0130 NE OLACAK<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bu durumda sabit \u00fccretin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da devam etmesi konusunda son karar\u0131, bozma karar\u0131na uyarsa s\u00f6z konusu yerel mahkeme verecek ve sabit \u00fccret uygulamas\u0131 devam edecek. Yerel mahkeme karar\u0131nda \u0131srar eder ve Yarg\u0131tay 13. Dairenin bozma karar\u0131na uymaz ve ilk karar\u0131nda direnirse son karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Dava Daireleri Genel Kurulu verecek.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B\u0130LG\u0130 TEKNOLOJ\u0130LER\u0130 VE \u0130LET\u0130\u015e\u0130M KURUMU A\u00c7IKLAMASI<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bilgi Teknolojileri ve \u0130leti\u015fim Kurumu (BTK) da, sabit \u00fccretin, kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunan bir uygulama oldu\u011funu bildirdi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">BTK&#8217;dan yap\u0131lan yaz\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada, kamuoyunda zaman zaman sabit \u00fccret uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n yasal dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bilgilerin dola\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilerek, 406 say\u0131l\u0131 Telgraf ve Telefon Kanunu&#8217;nun ek 18. maddesine 27 Ocak 2000 tarihli ve 4502 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunla ilave edilen son f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n &#8221;Bir i\u015f ve hizmetin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak al\u0131nan \u00fccret; abonman \u00fccreti, sabit \u00fccret, konu\u015fma \u00fccreti, hat kiras\u0131 ve benzeri kira, \u00fccretler ve bunlar gibi de\u011fi\u015fik \u00fccret kalemlerinden birisi veya birka\u00e7\u0131 olarak tespit edilebilir&#8221; \u015feklinde oldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u00e7\u0131klamada, s\u00f6z konusu maddenin iptali talebiyle Anayasa Mahkemesinde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sonucunda Anayasa Mahkemesinin 11 May\u0131s 2004 tarihli ve 25459 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanan E. 2000\/74, K. 2004\/9 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla sabit \u00fccretin Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi\u011fi belirtilerek, \u015f\u00f6yle devam edildi:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221;Ayr\u0131ca, 10 Kas\u0131m 2008 tarih ve 27050 (m\u00fckerrer) say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5809 say\u0131l\u0131 Elektronik Haberle\u015fme Kanunu&#8217;nun &#8216;tarifelerin d\u00fczenlenmesi&#8217; ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 13. maddesinde; &#8216;Tarife; abonman \u00fccreti, sabit \u00fccret, konu\u015fma \u00fccreti, hat kiras\u0131 ve benzeri de\u011fi\u015fik \u00fccret kalemlerinden birisi veya birka\u00e7\u0131 olarak tespit edilebilir&#8217; h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, sabit \u00fccret, kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunan bir uygulamad\u0131r.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #888888;\">Kaynak : Sabah Gazetesi<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nev\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, T\u00fcrk Telekom&#8217;un abonelerinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;sabit \u00fccret&#8221;in hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesine kar\u015f\u0131n, Yarg\u0131tay 13 Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin, bir ba\u015fka yerel mahkemenin ayn\u0131 do\u011frultudaki karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nev\u015fehir 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, T\u00fcrk Telekom&#8217;un abonelerinden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8220;sabit \u00fccret&#8221;in hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermesi hukuki tart\u0131\u015fma yaratt\u0131. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ekonomi","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}