{"id":24628,"date":"2010-08-07T17:23:18","date_gmt":"2010-08-07T17:23:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=24628"},"modified":"2010-08-07T17:23:18","modified_gmt":"2010-08-07T17:23:18","slug":"balyoz-yillarin-hatasini-duzeltti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=24628","title":{"rendered":"Balyoz, y\u0131llar\u0131n hatas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczeltti"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Yakalama kararlar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131ran heyetten yanl\u0131\u015f uygulamalar\u0131 bitiren karar…<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131yla devletin zirvesindeki gerilimi yumu\u015fatan 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zele\u015ftiri yapt\u0131: \u201cKa\u00e7ak olmayan san\u0131klara yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak hata yap\u0131ld\u0131. Pek \u00e7ok mahkeme ayn\u0131 hatay\u0131 yap\u0131yor ama ilk defa itiraz edildi. Yasalar\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f ve eksik uygulanmas\u0131, o i\u015flemin s\u00fcrekli yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, onu hukuka uygun hale getirmez. Uygulama bu \u015fekilde diyerek, hakimler ve mahkemelere hukuksuz i\u015f yapma hakk\u0131 do\u011furur ki, bu da kabul edilemez.\u201d <\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, \u201cBalyoz G\u00fcvenlik Harekat Plan\u0131\u201d davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tensip tutana\u011f\u0131nda 102 san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f, san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131 bu karardan vazge\u00e7mesi i\u00e7in mahkemeye ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftu. \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi de yakalama karar\u0131nda bir usuls\u00fczl\u00fck olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek karar\u0131nda direnmi\u015f ve dosyay\u0131 \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6ndermi\u015fti. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde san\u0131klardan sadece emekli Albay Ahmet \u015eent\u00fcrk yakalanarak cezaevine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u015eeref Ak\u00e7ay ve \u00fcye hakimler Oktay A\u00e7ar ile Metin \u00d6z\u00e7elik\u2019ten olu\u015fan mahkeme heyeti \u00f6nceki gece oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile 101 san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan yakalama karar\u0131 kald\u0131rd\u0131. Heyet haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 14 sayfal\u0131k karar\u0131nda, \u00f6ncelikle Ceza Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun (CMK) \u2018\u0130tiraz Hakk\u0131\u2019n\u0131 ve \u2018Yaklamay\u0131\u2019 d\u00fczenleyen maddeleri irdeledi. Zorla getirilmeye dair CMK\u2019daki maddeleri a\u00e7\u0131klayan Mahkeme, \u201cOlay\u0131m\u0131zda san\u0131klar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131 ifadeleri al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra tutuklanm\u0131\u015f ve daha sonra serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, bir k\u0131sm\u0131 yine savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bir k\u0131sm\u0131 da talimat ile ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve davada tutuksuz olarak a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d diyerek \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin CMK\u2019n\u0131n 98\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u2018Yakalama \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ka\u00e7ak olmalar\u0131 gerekir\u2019 <\/strong><\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n ka\u00e7ak \u015fart\u0131na uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren mahkeme heyeti kararda, \u201cCMK\u2019n\u0131n 98\/3 maddesine g\u00f6re san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ka\u00e7ak olmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fi vurguland\u0131. Mahkeme heyeti, san\u0131klar\u0131n bu duruma uymad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirterek, \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u00f6ncelikle bir k\u0131s\u0131m san\u0131klara oldu\u011fu gibi davetiye \u00e7\u0131karmas\u0131, san\u0131klar gelmedi\u011fi takdirde zorla getirme karar\u0131 vermesi ve buna ra\u011fmen gelmedikleri veya bulunamad\u0131klar\u0131 takdirde haklar\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u2018Hukuka uygun de\u011fil,Yarg\u0131tay imkan\u0131 da yok\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7eken Mahkeme, \u201cCMK\u2019n\u0131n 98\/3. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay denetimine gitme imkan\u0131 yoktur. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yakalama karar\u0131 dava a\u015famas\u0131nda kald\u0131r\u0131lmakta veya tutuklamaya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir. Bu nedenle bu madde ile ilgili Yarg\u0131tay\u2019dan verilmi\u015f bir karar bulunmamaktad\u0131r\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n

\u2018Yanl\u0131\u015f uygulamalar hukuka uygun hale getirmez \u2018<\/strong><\/p>\n

Karara \u015f\u00f6yle devam edildi: \u201cUygulamada mahkememizde dahil pek \u00e7ok mahkeme \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi tutuklamak amac\u0131yla yakalama kararlar\u0131 da \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak bunlar\u0131n hi\u00e7birisi itiraz konusu olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki, yasalar\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f ve eksik uygulanmas\u0131, o i\u015flemin s\u00fcrekli yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, onu hukuka uygun hale getirmez, uygulama bu \u015fekilde diyerek hakimler ve mahkemelere hukuksuz ve kanun i\u015f yapma hakk\u0131 do\u011furur ki bu da kabul edilemez. Bu nedenlerle \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan yakalama kararlar\u0131n\u0131 usulen \u00e7\u0131karma imkan\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na girmeden belirtilen usuli yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 olan san\u0131klar\u0131n itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u015eerh koydu: \u2018Ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesi var\u2019 <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi \u00dcye Hakimi Metin \u00d6z\u00e7elik, karara muhalefet etti. Hakim Metin \u00d6z\u00e7elik, muhalefet \u015ferhin 3 sayfal\u0131k bir gerek\u00e7e ile a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. \u201cHakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 olan 101 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 ya da \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez\u201d diyen Hakim \u00d6z\u00e7elik, bu nedenle san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde oldu\u011funu anlatt\u0131. Hakim, haklar\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan san\u0131klar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ka\u00e7ma tehlikesinin bulundu\u011funun somut olarak anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na da dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n

Balyoz\u2019un kaybedeni <\/strong><\/p>\n

11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin yakalama karar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rmas\u0131yla 101 san\u0131\u011fa cezaevi yolu kapand\u0131. Ancak, Afyon\u2019da ge\u00e7en hafta bankamatikten para \u00e7ekerken g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan emekli Albay Ahmet \u015eent\u00fcrk \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkemece tutuklama karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi i\u00e7in bu karardan yararlanamad\u0131. Balyoz davas\u0131ndaki tek tutuklu olan \u015eent\u00fcrk su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Plan Semineri\u2019ne bile kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ediyor.<\/p>\n

Aavukat\u0131 Zeki Arslan mahkemeye verdi\u011fi 14 May\u0131s tarihli savunmada m\u00fcvekkilinin 28 \u015eubat\u2019ta emeklilik dilek\u00e7esi verdi\u011fini ve izne ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 5-7 Mart 2003\u2019te 1. Ordu\u2019da yap\u0131lan Plan Semineri\u2019ne kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n imkans\u0131z oldu\u011funu savundu. 15 Nisan\u2019da resmen emekli olan m\u00fcvekkilinin o tarihten itibaren de Bursa Mudanya\u2019da in\u015faat malzemeleri satarak ticaret hayat\u0131na at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatan Arslan, ayn\u0131 ismi ta\u015f\u0131yan bir \u00fcste\u011fmenle kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olma ihtimali \u00fczerinde de duruyor.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015eTE \u015eENT\u00dcRK’\u00dcN BALYOZ G\u00dcNL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

28 \u015eubat 2002 Emeklili\u011fini istedi ve izne \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131<\/p>\n

5-7 Mart 2003 Balyoz seminerine izinli oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in kat\u0131lmad\u0131<\/p>\n

14 Nisan 2003 Emekli oldu ve teskeresini ald\u0131<\/p>\n

14 May\u0131s 2010 Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa ifade verdi<\/p>\n

23 Temmuz 2010 Yakalama karar\u0131 verildi<\/p>\n

30 Temmuz 2010 Afyon\u2019da g\u00f6z alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131<\/p>\n

4 A\u011fustos 2010 Tutukland\u0131<\/p>\n

Vatan \u0130stihbarat<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Yakalama kararlar\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131ran heyetten yanl\u0131\u015f uygulamalar\u0131 bitiren karar…<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131yla devletin zirvesindeki gerilimi yumu\u015fatan 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zele\u015ftiri yapt\u0131: \u201cKa\u00e7ak olmayan san\u0131klara yakalama karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak hata yap\u0131ld\u0131. Pek \u00e7ok mahkeme ayn\u0131 hatay\u0131 yap\u0131yor ama ilk defa itiraz edildi. Yasalar\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f ve eksik uygulanmas\u0131, o i\u015flemin s\u00fcrekli yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=24628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=24628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=24628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=24628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}