{"id":20191,"date":"2010-03-04T13:50:08","date_gmt":"2010-03-04T11:50:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=20191"},"modified":"2010-03-04T13:50:08","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T11:50:08","slug":"akp-kapatma-davasinin-bu-yonu-gozardi-ediliyor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=20191","title":{"rendered":"AKP Kapatma Davas\u0131n\u0131n Bu Y\u00f6n\u00fc G\u00f6zard\u0131 Ediliyor.."},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi, AKP\u2019nin kapatma davas\u0131nda, Parti\u2019nin ve \u00fcyelerinin eylemlerini yaln\u0131z \u201claiklik\u201d ilkesi, y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda Cumhuriyet\u2019in \u201cdemokratiklik\u201d niteli\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de incelemi\u015f; sonu\u00e7ta bu Parti\u2019nin, \u201claik Cumhuriyet\u201d ve \u201cdemokratik Cumhuriyet\u201d ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin oda\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcne kadar ihmal edilen en \u00f6nemli y\u00f6n\u00fc ve en b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6zelli\u011fi, AKP\u2019nin eylemlerinin \u201claik Cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesi yan\u0131nda \u201cdemokratik Cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesine de ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. <\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n \u201cSonu\u00e7\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, \u201cAdalet ve Kalk\u0131nma Partisi\u2019nin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 davas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan oylamada, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 68. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki demokratik ve laik Cumhuriyet ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin oda\u011f\u0131 haline gelmesi nedeniyle\u201d anlat\u0131m\u0131na yer verilerek, daval\u0131 parti eylemlerinin, hem \u201claik cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesine, hem de \u201cdemokratik cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir. Nedense bug\u00fcne kadar t\u00fcm s\u00f6ylenip yaz\u0131lanlarda, bu sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, kapatma davas\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddianamesinin sonunda, \u201cDaval\u0131 partiyi laiklik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin oda\u011f\u0131 haline getiren yukar\u0131daki fiiller ve beyanlar\u0131n, siyasal partinin\u2026kapat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fini\u201d belirterek kapatma istemini yaln\u0131zca \u201claiklik\u201d ilkesine dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Peki acaba, Anayasa Mahkemesi, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir istemi bulunmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n neden AKP\u2019nin eylemlerini \u201cdemokratik Cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de inceleme gere\u011fi duymu\u015ftur?<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7e ve h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin birlikte okunup de\u011ferlendirilmesinden, \u201claiklik\u201d konusunda, deyim yerindeyse \u201chafifletici neden\u201d bulma g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ni bu yola y\u00f6neltti\u011fi sonucunu \u00e7\u0131karmak olanakl\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Anayasa Mahkemesi, daval\u0131 partiye, \u201ckapatma\u201d yerine \u201cdevlet yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakma\u201d yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygularken, \u201chafifletici neden\u201d olarak t\u00fcm\u00fcyle siyasal ve demokratik gerek\u00e7eler kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, e\u011fer daval\u0131 parti eylemlerini \u201cdemokratik cumhuriyet\u201d ilkesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelemeseydi, sonunda \u201ckapatma\u201d karar\u0131 vermek zorunda kalacakt\u0131. Ku\u015fkusuz Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ni bu yola g\u00f6t\u00fcren neden, 6 oyda kalarak \u201ckapatma\u201d i\u00e7in nitelikli \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun bulunamamas\u0131 ve gerek\u00e7eye 4 oyla kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn egemen olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ne yaz\u0131k ki \u201cd\u00f6rt\u201d oyluk az\u0131nl\u0131k, salt nitelikli oy \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fat rol oynayabilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 Parti Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki, \u201cDemokrasi ama\u00e7 de\u011fil, ara\u00e7t\u0131r. Amac\u0131m\u0131za ula\u015fana kadar demokrasiye ba\u011fl\u0131y\u0131z\u201d, \u201cDemokrasi bir tramvayd\u0131r. \u0130stedi\u011fimiz dura\u011fa geldi\u011fimizde ineriz\u201d, \u201cHangi sisteme gitmek istiyorsan\u0131z, demokrasi bu d\u00fczenin se\u00e7iminde bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r\u201d, \u201cReferans\u0131m \u0130slam\u2019d\u0131r\u201d s\u00f6ylemleri an\u0131msand\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin, daval\u0131 partinin \u201cdemokratik Cumhuriyet ilkesine\u201d ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin de oda\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu saptamas\u0131 yad\u0131rgat\u0131c\u0131 de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

Yad\u0131rgat\u0131c\u0131 olan, Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u201ckapatma\u201d yerine \u201cDevlet yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rakma\u201d yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 uygulayabilmek i\u00e7in buldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7elerdir.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 partinin iktidar\u0131 d\u00f6neminde Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019ne giri\u015f \u00e7abas\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f; bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10, 30, 38, 90 ve 101. maddeleri de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek, hukuksal ve siyasal reformlara h\u0131z verilmi\u015ftir. Kararda, Anayasa de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek ya da di\u011fer yollarla yap\u0131lan standart y\u00fckseltme etkinlikleri \u015f\u00f6yle s\u0131ralanmaktad\u0131r: – \u00d6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131n\u0131 olanakl\u0131 k\u0131lan kurallar Anayasa\u2019dan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. – \u0130\u00e7 hukukta, uluslararas\u0131 insan haklar\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine \u00f6ncelik tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. – Bas\u0131mevi ve bas\u0131n ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir bi\u00e7imde su\u00e7 aleti oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle zapt ve m\u00fcsadere edilemeyece\u011fi ve i\u015fletmeden al\u0131konulamayaca\u011f\u0131 esas\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. – Kad\u0131n-erkek e\u015fitli\u011finde ileri bir a\u015fama olan pozitif ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k temel bir anayasal ilke olarak kabul edilmi\u015ftir. – Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n do\u011frudan halk taraf\u0131ndan se\u00e7ilmesi olana\u011f\u0131 yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. – Yerel y\u00f6netimler g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmi\u015ftir. – A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi nedenleri aras\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. – Uluslararas\u0131 Ceza Divan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama yetkisi benimsenmi\u015ftir. – Bir \u00e7ok uluslararas\u0131 temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck belgesinin i\u00e7 hukuka aktar\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. – Uluslararas\u0131 sorunlar\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131 yolla \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne aktif katk\u0131da bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin; hi\u00e7bir somut \u00f6rnek yokken uluslararas\u0131 sorunlar\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131 yolla \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcne aktif katk\u0131da bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131, Avrupa\u2019da me\u015frutiyetle y\u00f6netilen bir\u00e7ok \u00fclke varken Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n halka se\u00e7tirilmesini, \u201cCumhuriyeti daha M\u00fcsl\u00fcman bir yap\u0131ya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmek\u201d \u00e7abas\u0131, \u00fcniter ulus devlet sistemine verece\u011fi zarar g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilerek yerel y\u00f6netimlerin g\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesini, medyaya bunca bask\u0131 varken bas\u0131n ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n zapt ve m\u00fcsadere edilememesini gerek\u00e7e olarak kullanmas\u0131n\u0131 anlamak olanakl\u0131 de\u011fildir. De\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nan bu \u201chafifletici nedenler\u201d, siyasal ve toplumsal ya\u015fam ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7inde, hangi parti tek ba\u015f\u0131na iktidar olursa olsun yerine getirilecek sorumluluklard\u0131r. Bunlar\u0131n \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f bat\u0131 demokrasi standard\u0131na ula\u015fma \u00e7abalar\u0131 olarak, daval\u0131 partinin kapat\u0131lmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 t\u00fcm\u00fcyle zorlama bir de\u011ferlendirmeye dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bu gerek\u00e7eler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin, (\u0131) se\u00e7menlerin, Temmuz 2007 se\u00e7imlerinde AKP\u2019ye % 46.57 oy verdi\u011fini belirterek, halk\u0131n isnat edilen eylemler i\u00e7in partiye onay verdi\u011fini, (\u0131\u0131) daval\u0131 partinin, t\u00fcrban\u0131n \u00fcniversitelerde serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin iptalinden sonra se\u00e7men kitlesini eyleme ve \u015fiddet hareketlerinde bulunmaya te\u015fvik etmemesini, (\u0131\u0131\u0131) demokrasiyi ve laik devlet d\u00fczenini ortadan kald\u0131rma ve anayasal d\u00fczenin temel esaslar\u0131n\u0131 \u201c\u015fiddet\u201d kullanarak tahrip etme amac\u0131n\u0131n saptanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtip bunlar\u0131 \u201ckapatmama\u201d nedeni olarak kullanmas\u0131 da kesinlikle anla\u015f\u0131labilir ve kabul edilebilir de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n

Her biri ayr\u0131 bir yaz\u0131 konusu olabilecek bu eylemleri, bir hukuk devletinde olumlu davran\u0131\u015flar gibi g\u00f6stermenin hakl\u0131 ve anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r bir yan\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte karar, demokrasi havarisi kesilenlerin asl\u0131nda \u201cdemokratiklik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin oda\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu\u201d g\u00f6stermesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00e7ok \u00f6nemlidir.<\/p>\n

B\u00fclent Serim<\/em><\/p>\n

Eski Anayasa Mahkemesi Genel Sekreteri<\/em><\/p>\n

Kaynak : Odatv.com<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi, AKP\u2019nin kapatma davas\u0131nda, Parti\u2019nin ve \u00fcyelerinin eylemlerini yaln\u0131z \u201claiklik\u201d ilkesi, y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda Cumhuriyet\u2019in \u201cdemokratiklik\u201d niteli\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de incelemi\u015f; sonu\u00e7ta bu Parti\u2019nin, \u201claik Cumhuriyet\u201d ve \u201cdemokratik Cumhuriyet\u201d ilkelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerin oda\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcne kadar ihmal edilen en \u00f6nemli y\u00f6n\u00fc ve en b\u00fcy\u00fck <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kose-yazilari","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20191\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}