{"id":20056,"date":"2010-03-03T19:10:41","date_gmt":"2010-03-03T17:10:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=20056"},"modified":"2010-03-03T19:10:41","modified_gmt":"2010-03-03T17:10:41","slug":"danistayin-katsayi-kararinin-gerekcesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/?p=20056","title":{"rendered":"Dan\u0131\u015ftay'\u0131n katsay\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi belli oldu"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu’nun, Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn farkl\u0131 katsay\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 ret gerek\u00e7eleri belli oldu. Gerek\u00e7ede, “\u0130darenin yeni sisteme g\u00f6re bir katsay\u0131 oran\u0131 belirlerken ge\u00e7mi\u015f uygulamalar\u0131 da dikkate almas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan ilke ve esaslar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetmesi gerekmektedir” denildi. <\/p>\n

Kurulun, 14’e kar\u015f\u0131 15 \u00fcyenin oyuyla ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, \u00fcniversiteye giri\u015fte A\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 Orta\u00f6\u011fretim Ba\u015far\u0131 Puan\u0131’n\u0131n (AOBP) 0.15 ve 0.13 \u00e7arp\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6ylece bir \u00f6nceki, yani 21 Temmuz 2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Y\u00d6K Karar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda verilen y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 karar\u0131 ile alan i\u00e7i, alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tercihte farkl\u0131 katsay\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dava konusu karar ile yeni bir d\u00fczenleme getirildi\u011fi ve adaylar\u0131n mezun oldu\u011fu alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcmle ilgili veya bu alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcmle ilgili olmayan tercihlerde uygulanacak katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n 0.02 olarak belirlendi\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn 21 Temmuz 2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc karar\u0131n\u0131n, Dan\u0131\u015ftay 8. Dairesince y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durduruldu\u011fu ve karara yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulunca reddedildi\u011fi an\u0131msat\u0131lan gerek\u00e7ede, bu nedenle idarenin bu konuda yeniden bir d\u00fczenleme yapabilece\u011fi vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

“Ancak, bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 \u00fczerine ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan hukuki bo\u015flu\u011fun doldurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in idarece yap\u0131lacak yeni d\u00fczenlemede yarg\u0131 karar\u0131nda yer alan ve h\u00fckme esas olan gerek\u00e7elerin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir” denilen gerek\u00e7ede, Kurulun, 21 Temmuz 2009 tarihli Y\u00d6K karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddi gerek\u00e7elerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7ede, kurulun bu gerek\u00e7esi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, dava konusu d\u00fczenlemelerin bu karara ve gerek\u00e7esine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yeni d\u00fczenleme ile getirilen katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine, e\u011fitimin \u00f6rg\u00fctleni\u015f bi\u00e7imindeki b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011fe uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm, mesleki e\u011fitim ve genel lise e\u011fitimi gibi ayr\u0131mlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesinin gerekli oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dava konusu d\u00fczenlemeyle getirilen katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n, adaylar\u0131n alan i\u00e7i ve alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tercihleri aras\u0131nda en fazla 10, en az 2 puanl\u0131k bir fark olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ifade edilen gerek\u00e7ede, “Esas\u0131nda dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 2. maddesi ile getirilen katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131 tam anlam\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan da z\u0131mnen kabul edildi\u011fi savunmas\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn savunmas\u0131 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi savunmas\u0131nda, katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan gerek\u00e7elere ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ger\u00e7e\u011fini bu \u015fekilde izah etmeye, kan\u0131tlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilen gerek\u00e7ede, \u015fu tespitler yap\u0131ld\u0131:<\/p>\n

“Ancak, daval\u0131 idarenin bu savlar\u0131 hukuken ge\u00e7erli bilimsel verilere dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, 0.15 – 0.13 katsay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nceki yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6nlendirmesi amac\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya y\u00f6nelik ve etkili oldu\u011fu da hukuken ge\u00e7erli bilgi ve belgelere dayan\u0131larak kan\u0131tlanamamaktad\u0131r. \u0130darenin yeni sisteme g\u00f6re bir katsay\u0131 oran\u0131 belirlerken ge\u00e7mi\u015f uygulamalar\u0131 da dikkate almas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan ilke ve esaslar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7ta, dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 2. maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme ile \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine uygun olarak bir katsay\u0131 belirlemesi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 0,02 puanl\u0131k katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131 bi\u00e7imsel olarak uygulamaya y\u00f6nelik ve sembolik nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve bu haliyle e\u011fitim sisteminin \u00f6rg\u00fctleni\u015f bi\u00e7imini bozabilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 2. maddesinde ama\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuka uyarl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

\u0130lk bin ki\u015fi aras\u0131na giren adaylara ek puan verilmesi <\/strong><\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7ede, Y\u00d6K karar\u0131n\u0131n, T\u00fcrkiye genelinde ilk bin ki\u015fi aras\u0131na giren adaylar\u0131n yerle\u015ftirme puan\u0131 hesaplan\u0131rken, A\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 Orta\u00f6\u011fretim Ba\u015far\u0131 Puan\u0131’n\u0131n tercih edecekleri b\u00fct\u00fcn programlar i\u00e7in, alan i\u00e7i katsay\u0131 de\u011ferinin 0.15 olarak kullan\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 kural\u0131na yer verildi\u011fi an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131. 2547 say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Yasas\u0131’nda \u00f6\u011frencilerin orta\u00f6\u011fretimdeki ba\u015far\u0131 durumlar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131nav sonucuna ya da y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumuna yerle\u015ftirme i\u015flemine nas\u0131l yans\u0131t\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fi kaydedilen gerek\u00e7ede, s\u0131nav sunucunda belli bir ba\u015far\u0131 d\u00fczeyine eri\u015fenlere y\u00f6nelik herhangi bir kural ve istisnaya Yasa’da yer verilmedi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7ede, “Bu uygulama mesleki e\u011fitim, genel lise e\u011fitimi, alan\/b\u00f6l\u00fcm gibi ayr\u0131mlardan hareketle farkl\u0131 katsay\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fine i\u015faret eden yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ve e\u015fitlik kural\u0131na da ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretime Ge\u00e7i\u015f S\u0131nav\u0131 ve Lisans Yerle\u015ftirme S\u0131nav\u0131’nda bir\u00e7ok puan t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu ve her puan t\u00fcr\u00fcnde ilk bine giren \u00f6\u011frenci say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n bu kuraldan yararlanabilece\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu uygulaman\u0131n mevcut haliyle dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 6. maddesinde belirtilenden daha fazla say\u0131da aday\u0131 kapsayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki puan t\u00fcr\u00fc art\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak uygulaman\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n daha da geni\u015fleyebilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakta, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kesin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 bulunmayan ve ileriye d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak kapsam\u0131 geni\u015fletilebilecek nitelikte bir d\u00fczenleme getirildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu itibarla, dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 6. maddesinde de hukuka uyarl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015fti” denildi.<\/p>\n

Kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun karar\u0131na kat\u0131lmayan 14 \u00fcyenin kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde, katsay\u0131 fark\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6nlendirmesinde kullan\u0131lan bir ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle katsay\u0131 fark\u0131 getirilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fen yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konuldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn 21 Temmuz 2009 tarihli karar\u0131 ile getirilen yeni s\u0131nav sistemiyle birlikte katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fitlenmesi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durduruldu\u011fu ve bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n da reddedildi\u011fi an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde,”Bu nedenle, gelinen noktada 21 Temmuz 2009 tarihli kararla getirilen yeni s\u0131nav sisteminde de y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretime giri\u015f s\u0131nav\u0131nda alan i\u00e7i ve alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tercihlerde katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Ancak, katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir \u00f6nceki d\u00fczenlemenin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dava konusu d\u00fczenleme ile alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tercihlerde farkl\u0131 ve daha az, alan i\u00e7i tercihlerde ise daha fazla bir katsay\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclerek katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 noktas\u0131nda yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir” denildi.<\/p>\n

Kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde, yeni belirlenen katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n, Milli E\u011fitim Temel Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n amac\u0131na, yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan ilkelere uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, yeni getirilen s\u0131nav sisteminin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde ve sistemin katsay\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00f6zelliklerinin de dikkate almas\u0131 suretiyle de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131ran 21 Temmuz 2009 g\u00fcnl\u00fc Y\u00d6K karar\u0131 ile ayr\u0131ca getirilen iki a\u015famal\u0131 ve bir\u00e7ok puan t\u00fcr\u00fcnden olu\u015fan s\u0131nav sistemine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir dava bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen gerek\u00e7ede, bu yeni sisteme y\u00f6nelik verilmi\u015f bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle yeni s\u0131nav sistemi halen y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

“Katsay\u0131 e\u015fitlenemez” <\/strong><\/p>\n

Yeni sistemde standart puan aral\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n 100-500 aral\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle art\u0131k bu yeni sistemde 0.8-0.3 katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanma kabiliyetinin kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen gerek\u00e7ede, “Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretime giri\u015fte orta\u00f6\u011fretim ba\u015far\u0131 puan\u0131n\u0131n esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, katsay\u0131 uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n da bu ama\u00e7la getirilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu ku\u015fkusuzdur. Katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, katsay\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fitlenemeyece\u011fi de \u00f6nceki yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulmu\u015ftur” denildi.<\/p>\n

Gerek\u00e7ede, “Ayr\u0131ca, 4 May\u0131s 2004 tarihli 5171 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131’nca onaylanmayarak tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek \u00fczere T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisine iade gerek\u00e7elerinin aras\u0131nda, katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n yasa ile belirlenmemesi gerekti\u011fi, alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6nlendirmesinde bir ara\u00e7 olarak kullan\u0131lan katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n ihtiyaca g\u00f6re bu konuda yetkili olan Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne de yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6nlendirmesinde kullan\u0131lan bir ara\u00e7 olan katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131 zorunlu ise de, bu fark a\u015f\u0131lamayacak oranda olmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla, katsay\u0131 fark\u0131 adaylar\u0131n mezun oldu\u011fu alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm ile ilgili olmayan bir program\u0131 tercih etmeleri halinde bu programa yerle\u015ftirilmelerini imkans\u0131z k\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

Kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde, 1999 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2003 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar uygulanan 0.5-0.3 katsay\u0131 oran\u0131n\u0131n 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda yine Y\u00d6K karar\u0131 ile 0.8-0.3 oran\u0131 ile de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fi ve bu katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla ilgili \u00e7e\u015fitli davalar a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Davalarda, “o tarihte uygulanan sistemin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00f6zellikleri i\u00e7inde konunun de\u011ferlendirilerek, sistemin \u00f6zelliklerine g\u00f6re y\u00f6nlendirmede tek arac\u0131n katsay\u0131 oldu\u011fu da dikkate al\u0131narak, bu konuda al\u0131nan katsay\u0131 fark\u0131n\u0131n artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n sistemin amac\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu ve Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kuruluna bu konuda tan\u0131nan yetkinin kamu yarar\u0131na uygun kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu” sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay 8. Dairesinin bu y\u00f6ndeki kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu’nca da onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 an\u0131msat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

“Katsay\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka ara\u00e7lar\u0131n da kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir” <\/strong><\/p>\n

Kar\u015f\u0131 oy gerek\u00e7esinde, \u015f\u00f6yle denildi:<\/p>\n

“Alan i\u00e7i ve alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tercihlerde ge\u00e7erli olacak katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin idari kararlar\u0131n yarg\u0131sal denetimi yap\u0131l\u0131rken uygulanan s\u0131nav sisteminin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde yasan\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 ve bu amac\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan y\u00f6ntemin \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131narak konunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m, \u00f6nceki katsay\u0131 davalar\u0131nda da esas al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve sistemin \u00f6zellikleri dikkate al\u0131narak s\u00f6z konusu yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

21 Temmuz 2009’da getirilen yeni sistemde, s\u0131nav\u0131n birinci ve ikinci a\u015famas\u0131nda bir \u00e7ok puan t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu ve bu puan t\u00fcrlerinin her birinde soru say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve soru a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, getirilen sistemde farkl\u0131 puan t\u00fcrleri y\u00f6ntemi ile alan y\u00f6nlendirmesinde katsay\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka ara\u00e7lar\u0131n da kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Bu durumda, katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131, uygulamadan kalkan ve alan y\u00f6nlendirmesinde tek arac\u0131n katsay\u0131 oldu\u011fu eski sisteme g\u00f6re de\u011fil, alan, b\u00f6l\u00fcm y\u00f6nlendirmesi amac\u0131na hizmet eden farkl\u0131 s\u0131nav ve puan t\u00fcrlerinin bulundu\u011fu yeni s\u0131nav sistemine g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, dava konusu d\u00fczenlemenin 2. maddesi ile getirilen katsay\u0131 oranlar\u0131n\u0131n Milli E\u011fitim Temel Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n amac\u0131na, bu konudaki yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

CNN T\u00dcRK<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu’nun, Y\u00d6K’\u00fcn farkl\u0131 katsay\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 ret gerek\u00e7eleri belli oldu. Gerek\u00e7ede, “\u0130darenin yeni sisteme g\u00f6re bir katsay\u0131 oran\u0131 belirlerken ge\u00e7mi\u015f uygulamalar\u0131 da dikkate almas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan ilke ve esaslar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetmesi gerekmektedir” denildi. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gundem","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.korhanyilmaz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}